Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

WIMBLEY TO OAKLAND


DAWGPOUND16

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

He was absolutely nothing special. I think Savage drafted him because he was wholesome. The Ravens took the big NT, sigh.

 

Don't worry about Wimbley, we'll get a real pass rusher, boys.

 

Zombo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not one as good as wimbley

facts dont lie top 10 in the NFL for 3-4 OLB

 

 

He had 6 1/2 sacks. Big whoop. Matt Roth had four in six games.

 

Wimbley is a serviceable pass rusher. We can do better than serviceable.

 

Zombo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had 6 1/2 sacks. Big whoop. Matt Roth had four in six games.

 

Wimbley is a serviceable pass rusher. We can do better than serviceable.

 

Zombo

 

One dimensional. He looked like a Retard running after a watermelon trying to cover. I'm not saying he was horrible, but we can do better in the draft. And people let me ask you this, when has Oakland made a good personnel decision?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well no crap. That comment was so laughable...

 

For a pass-rushing LB, sacks pretty much are the only single thing. Wimbley sucked in coverage too, so... whats your point?

 

Owned harder

 

I didn't have to come back with anything, that is how dumb that comment was. Then he said I was owned.

 

We need to sticky this guys posts for a good laugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

top 10 stats in the NFL

Roth was cut in the season

 

HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE diffrence

 

You can keep saying Top Ten all you want, the guy is ordinary as far as pass rush specialists go, and that's his job.

 

He's very athletic, but he's one-dimensional as a pass rusher.

 

Holmgren and Mangini will find someone better for that role, believe me.

 

Zombo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...