playerjdd Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 So the Browns unfortunately didn't receive any compensatory picks this year but here is who did: This is the breakdown of the compensatory picks by round and team. http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/1...w;pageContainer Round 3 Cincinnati -- 96th overall Tennessee -- 97 Atlanta -- 98 Round 4 Cincinnati -- 131 Round 5 Pittsburgh -- 164 Atlanta -- 165 Pittsburgh -- 166 Minnesota -- 167 San Diego -- 168 Green Bay -- 169 Round 6 Carolina -- 202 Jacksonville -- 203 Carolina -- 204 New England -- 205 San Francisco -- 206 Tennessee -- 207 Round 7 Indianapolis -- 240 Tennessee -- 241 Pittsburgh -- 242 Philadelphia -- 243 Philadelphia -- 244 Seattle -- 245 Indianapolis -- 246 New England -- 247 New England -- 248 Carolina -- 249 New England -- 250 Oakland -- 251 Miami -- 252 Tampa Bay -- 253 St. Louis -- 254 Detroit -- 255 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaak Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 So much for that fella who was bound and determined to count two picks for Davis and Jones before the compensatory picks had even been declared. I read an interesting article here that explains compensatory picks really well. Because we got more value in free agents coming in, than we got going out, we got squadoosh in compensatory picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choco Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 wow...i couldn't have been more wrong. "It should be noted that the contract value used in the equation does not include some parts of the contract, and that the contract information reported in the media is often incorrect." being an engineer, i've seen some pretty messed up formulas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 Just the way it works. When you don't have much demand for players on your roster...or FA who were on your roster, you aren't getting many extra picks. Shouldn't be surprising. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRREBEL Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 shouldn't they throw us a bone just for pitty's sake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.