ATENEARS Posted April 25, 2010 Report Share Posted April 25, 2010 The only addition the Browns have made to a pretty poor Receiving core is yesterdays 6th Round pick Carlton Mitchell from South Florida. Tony Grossi reports that the Browns 2009 leading receivers (Jerome Harrison & Mohamed Massaquoi) had 34 catches. That's the lowest total to lead the Browns since the NFL went to a 16-game schedule in 1978. Even the 1999 expansion Browns had three players with 44 or more catches. Grossi & Mary Kay Cabot both seemed to emphasis Josh Cribbs playing a bigger role with the receiving corp, perhaps this stems from Holmgrems/Mangini's/Heckerts Press Conference? (I didn't hear it all, I don' know), but the fact hat they are both now singing this same tune about Cribbs must mean they heard it from the source somewhere. In my opinion, Josh Cribbs is not a receiver to penciled in here. He is a package guy that can be tossed in to create mis-matches at times, but we are joking if this is all we got to bolster up a very weak 2009 unit after the departure of Braylon Edwards. Only name being thrown around in the veteran department is Mangini's ex-Jet (and Bengal in 09) Lavranues Coles, who got paid HUGE last year in Cincy. This is of Major concern and is today's biggest need by far. I don't know much about Carlton Mitchell, but in this picture he looks like he can drop the football as good as anyone we have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted April 25, 2010 Report Share Posted April 25, 2010 The only addition the Browns have made to a pretty poor Receiving core is yesterdays 6th Round pick Carlton Mitchell from South Florida. Tony Grossi reports that the Browns 2009 leading receivers (Jerome Harrison & Mohamed Massaquoi) had 34 catches. That's the lowest total to lead the Browns since the NFL went to a 16-game schedule in 1978. Even the 1999 expansion Browns had three players with 44 or more catches. Grossi & Mary Kay Cabot both seemed to emphasis Josh Cribbs playing a bigger role with the receiving corp, perhaps this stems from Holmgrems/Mangini's/Heckerts Press Conference? (I didn't hear it all, I don' know), but the fact hat they are both now singing this same tune about Cribbs must mean they heard it from the source somewhere. In my opinion, Josh Cribbs is not a receiver to penciled in here. He is a package guy that can be tossed in to create mis-matches at times, but we are joking if this is all we got to bolster up a very weak 2009 unit after the departure of Braylon Edwards. Only name being thrown around in the veteran department is Mangini's ex-Jet (and Bengal in 09) Lavranues Coles, who got paid HUGE last year in Cincy. This is of Major concern and is today's biggest need by far. I don't know much about Carlton Mitchell, but in this picture he looks like he can drop the football as good as anyone we have. I think Chansi Stuckey has a chance to become the Brian Brennan possession guy we need. MoMass is going to be a good one, but needs someone across from him to take the pressure off. That's where Brian Robiskie comes in. He is the key. I always thought Robiskie was so smooth at Ohio St. He's got size, speed, hands ...he's got the chance to grow leaps and bounds in his second year. Delhomme and Wallace are going to be GREAT for these guy's development. I agree with you on Cribbs role, although at this point I think they still consider him the starter across from MoMass. I'd love to see Robiskie turn Cribbs back into a specialist. And you are right .. we need more bodies at the position, we should grab three WR UFAs today. Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted April 25, 2010 Report Share Posted April 25, 2010 I don't know Stan. I think we have some decent receivers.....no doubt no all-pros, but I can't help but think the qb play had some impact on the receiver play last year. I wouldn't be surprised if MoMass caught 60 balls this year....won't guess at TD catches. I also can't help but think Robiskie isn't the total stiff he looked like last year. You follow OSU....while I know Robiskie was never the top receiver prospect to come out of OSU, he wasn't crapola was he?? Also, when the time is right, I could see us signing another vet. I think we could only do so much this year and the thinking was what we have will be good enough...expecting a few of them continue to develop. Next year could be a prime year for a 1st or 2nd round receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browns57 Posted April 25, 2010 Report Share Posted April 25, 2010 I am hoping to see Freddie Barnes as one of those UFA's that we sign. You dont break records in college and not have any skills. Go get him Cleveland! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keylime Posted April 25, 2010 Report Share Posted April 25, 2010 I like our group of young guys we have (Massaquoi, Robiskie, Stuckey, Mitchell, Cribbs). By stockpiling guys who profile as #2 or #3 wideouts just like the Giants and Eagles have done we are using a good strategy IMO. We are a difference making, true #1 WR away from having a good unit there. Adding a guy like AJ Green, Julio Jones, Michael Floyd, or Jonathan Baldwin next year in the first round, or adding a stud veteran #1 like Miami did this year with Marshall or the Jets did with Holmes could solve our problem there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gips Posted April 25, 2010 Report Share Posted April 25, 2010 We may be stronger at WR than many believe because we were weak at QB however i would still feel better if we acquired at least one real true scorcher, all we really lack is speed and experience.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefjerky Posted April 25, 2010 Report Share Posted April 25, 2010 I am hoping to see Freddie Barnes as one of those UFA's that we sign. You dont break records in college and not have any skills. Go get him Cleveland! I believe Chicago signed him. Makes sense since he's from around the area, he likely grew up a Bears fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl34 Posted April 25, 2010 Report Share Posted April 25, 2010 We may be stronger at WR than many believe because we were weak at QB however i would still feel better if we acquired at least one real true scorcher, all we really lack is speed and experience.. Gips, I think you're possibly correct. I would like to see what our WR's do with better QB play. To be fair, it's not as if they were never open last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Mike Posted April 25, 2010 Report Share Posted April 25, 2010 We may be stronger at WR than many believe because we were weak at QB however i would still feel better if we acquired at least one real true scorcher, all we really lack is speed and experience.. The lack of experience is exactly why I'm pleased we didn't go after a receiver early in the Draft. Sign a veteran & be patient. The QBs we had last year didn't help the young receivers we have. To paraphrase an old commercial, "We've come a LONG way, baby" Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.