Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Obama Blocked Clean-Up of BP Oil Spill by Friendly Countries


Mr. T

Recommended Posts

Obama Blocked Clean-Up of BP Oil Spill by Friendly Countries

 

Is this another crisis Obama doesn't want to waste?

 

Crucial offers to help clean up BP’s oil spill “have come from Belgian, Dutch, and Norwegian firms that . . . possess some of the world’s most advanced oil skimming ships.” But the Obama Administration wouldn’t accept the help, because doing so would require it to do something past presidents have routinely done: waive rules imposed by the Jones Act, a law backed by unions.

 

“The BP clean-up effort in the Gulf of Mexico is hampered by the Jones Act. This is a piece of 1920s protectionist legislation, that requires all vessels working in U.S. waters to be American-built, and American-crewed. So the U.S. Coast Guard" cannot "accept, and therefore don’t ask for, the assistance of high-tech European vessels specifically designed for the task in hand.”

 

The law itself permits the President to waive these requirements, and such waivers were “granted, promptly, by the Bush administration,” in the aftermath of hurricanes and other emergencies. But Obama has refused to do so, notes David Warren in the Ottawa Citizen.

 

“After the Obama administration refused help from the Netherlands, Geert Visser, the consul general for the Netherlands in Houston, told Loren Steffy: ‘Let’s forget about politics; let’s get it done.’” But for Obama, politics always comes first: “The explanation of Obama’s reluctance to seek this remedy is his cozy relationship with labor unions. . . ‘The unions see it [not waiving the act] as … protecting jobs. They hate when the Jones Act gets waived.’”

 

Ironically, even the staunchest supporters of the Jones Act are now distancing themselves from refusals to accept foreign help, saying they have “not and will not stand in the way of the use of these well-established waiver procedures to address this crisis.” Obama is being more intransigently pro-union than the unions themselves. Never mind that "each day our European allies are prevented from helping us speed up the clean up is another day that Gulf fishing and tourism jobs die.”

 

In April 2009, the Obama administration granted BP, a big supporter of Obama, a waiver of environmental regulations. But after the oil spill, it blocked Louisiana from protecting its coastline against the oil spill by delaying rather than expediting regulatory approval of essential protective measures. It has also chosen not to use what has been described as “the most effective method” of fighting the spill, a method successfully used in other oil spills. Democratic strategist James Carville called Obama’s handling of the oil spill “lackadaisical” and “unbelievable” in its “stupidity.”

 

Obama is now using BP’s oil spill to push the global-warming legislation that BP had lobbied for. Obama’s global warming legislation expands ethanol subsidies, which cause famine, starvation, and food riots in poor countries by shrinking the food supply. Ethanol makes gasoline costlier and dirtier, increases ozone pollution, and increases the death toll from smog and air pollution. Ethanol production also results in deforestation, soil erosion, and water pollution. Subsidies for biofuels like ethanol are a big source of corporate welfare: “BP has lobbied for and profited from subsidies for biofuels . . . that cannot break even without government support.”

 

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and, after what, 56 days?

 

Mr. "Present" instead of "yes or no"

 

can decide to waive the Jones Act, which he most certainly

 

can do -

 

he wanted to use this disaster for his own political gain.

 

And that, is the worst thing any of us can really say about him.

 

Not qualified to be the president of our country, dishonest,

 

radical with no solutions,

 

he's a loser.

 

And now, in a poll by a Democratic owned company... Louisiana

 

voters now say Obamao has blown this disaster worse than Bush did Katrina.

 

So, there ya go.

 

The last splinters of bark are falling off the ugly Obamao regime tree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you know the spinmeisters are frantically trying to come up with a way to correct the mistake without seeming weak and bowing to pressure.WSS

 

 

And about that 'moritorium' on off shore drilling?

 

It is a moritorium on obtaining licenses to drill.

 

Those already with licenses and already drilling aren't affected.

 

Personally, allowing companies to continue to drill doesn't bother me - I actually support it - but for Obama to misrepresent his actions like he did/does is going to come back and bite him in the asp.

 

On another note, I happened to stop at Madcow's show for a minute last night and the talk was about how hard it is to sever the ties between the Bush Administration's policy and 'Big Oil'.

 

It is all Bush's fault again. People are already fed up with this stuff, two years into the new administration.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd honestly like to know why the hell the stupid ass Jones Act hasn't been repealed yet. It's a complete crock of shit. If they can help us, fking let them in.

 

 

On Friday, Sen., Kay Bailey Hutchinson ® of Texas filed legislation to waive the Jones Act to welcome more high-tech foreign clean-up boats, saying the Jones Act is standing in the way. Here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...