titleist585 Posted December 9, 2008 Report Share Posted December 9, 2008 http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=Aiwx...o&type=lgns LAS VEGAS – Two American League Central teams have discussed trading for shortstop Miguel Tejada, whom the Houston Astros are dangling as they try to cut payroll, a source said Monday at the winter meetings. The Cleveland Indians and Minnesota Twins have similar tacks regarding the 34-year-old Tejada: Both teams have holes on the left side of their infields, and both would expect Houston to eat a significant portion of Tejada’s $13 million contract for 2009. Problem is, that would partially negate the Astros’ incentive to unload a player whose production is declining but who still batted .283 with 13 home runs and 92 runs scored last season. Cleveland’s ability to trade for Tejada depends on how it fills its closer role. Should the Indians pursue free agent Brian Fuentes, they likely would not be able to afford Tejada, who is a free agent after the 2009 season. If the Indians opt for less expensive free agent Trevor Hoffman or trade for J.J. Putz, their budget would likely allow for a discounted Tejada. Where he would fit with the Indians is unknown. Cleveland’s incumbent shortstop, Jhonny Peralta, has played third base in the Dominican Winter League this offseason, and the Indians would like to move slick-fielding Asdrubal Cabrera to shortstop from second base. Tejada’s winnowing range has long portended a move to third base. Minnesota enters 2009 without an everyday shortstop. The Twins have discussed trading outfielder Delmon Young, and Philadelphia recently showed interest, with shortstop prospect Jason Donald the likely match. Were the Twins to more doggedly pursue Tejada, the source said, Houston would prefer one of its young starting pitchers, likely a minor leaguer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beanpot Posted December 9, 2008 Report Share Posted December 9, 2008 Holy crap, first I've heard of this. Tejada's production has dropped every year since 2004 and there's little to suggest that he'll suddenly become rejuvenated at 35. Depends on the $$$ and player cost going the other way, but I can't imagine this goes down. Beanpot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YtownBrownsBacker Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Why would you sign Tejada when he has less range then Peralta? We need to strengthen our infield defense with the ground ball pictures we have. I'd rather have a slick fielding SS with no bat and Peralta at 3B. I'd rather try to go after Roberts as long as Balt doesn't want all our prospects. Give them Sowers, Barfield and Crowe. They want a picture ready for the majors and a lefthanded outfielder. I'll take Roberts even if it's only for one year. One of the best leadoff hitters in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted December 11, 2008 Report Share Posted December 11, 2008 Holy crap, first I've heard of this. Tejada's production has dropped every year since 2004 and there's little to suggest that he'll suddenly become rejuvenated at 35. Depends on the $$$ and player cost going the other way, but I can't imagine this goes down. Beanpot I agree. That seems like a loser deal to me. Why??? Thumbs down to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.