Jump to content

More Rumors


Recommended Posts

Not much substance behind this one, but it's out there and may as well post it here:


According to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Indians are looking for a number three starter. While the Indians have a couple young starters with potential behind Lee and Carmona, they would like to add an established pitcher who can put up double-digit wins. With that said, Jon Garland could be their guy.


While he might return to the Angels, Garland may like Cleveland considering he pitched in Chicago for several seasons and is very familiar with the division. He is just twenty-nine years old and could be on the verge of peaking. Garland made twelve million in 2008 and is probably looking at that or a little more in 2009. I'd say a three year deal worth somewhere between 30-36 million dollars would get it done.


Other pitchers they could pursue include Braden Looper, Jamie Moyer, and Randy Wolf.


From Buster Olney: The Indians and Royals "are not" talking about a deal involving Mark Teahen.


http://bleacherreport.com/articles/7450 ... nd-indians



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Little substance here too. At least it mentions the Tribe:


Hot Stove Central: Third Basemen

October 29, 2008


It’s hard to tell whether third base will be a buyer’s market or a seller’s market, as there’s little in the way of supply or demand.


Both New York teams are just fine, thank you, at the hot corner, as Alex Rodriguez and David Wright aren’t going anywhere. That’s pretty much the case with most teams in the majors, too, so it’s not like Casey Blake and Joe Crede will have their pick of where to play.


The team most glaringly in need of a third baseman is the Indians, who traded Blake to the Dodgers in July. Andy Marte has yet to give Cleveland any indication that he’ll be able to hit at the major-league level, while Jamey Carroll is better suited to the middle infield and Wes Hodges (18 homers in Double-A) isn’t ready yet.


In Los Angeles, meanwhile, Blake should be replaced by another Blake - Blake DeWitt, that is. The rookie played second base down the stretch, but is a natural third baseman and acquitted himself nicely there before the trade.


Crede’s team, the White Sox, has Josh Fields, who hit 23 homers in 2007 and hopes to return to the majors after knee surgery. Juan Uribe, a natural shortstop who played a lot of third base after Crede’s season ended early with his bugaboo back problems resurfacing, is also a free agent. So the position is open on the South Side and it’s just a question of how GM Ken Williams wants to fill it.


Then there are the Brewers, who used Bill Hall, Russell Branyan and Craig Counsell at third base this year, none with great success. If Milwaukee decides to keep J.J. Hardy, he could move from shortstop to third.


Blake might find more suitors as a first baseman/outfielder/DH. Given Crede’s injury problems and the state of the market, it seems unlikely that Scott Boras will be able to get him a multi-year deal. In that case, don’t count out a return to Chicago.


With most teams stable at third base, the trade market figures to be about as quiet as free agency, though some old rumors such as Adrian Beltre to the Twins likely will be revisited.


http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/touchi ... aseme.html



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garland, Looper, Moyer, and Wolf? I'm not exactly excited to see any of these names. With these guys and the Teahan rumor, the Indians are not exactly going after any great players.


Agreed, but I don't know that they're going after any of these guys. The Teahan rumor was shot down by his current organization and this Garland thing is nothing more than speculation.


Speaking of rumors, here's the latest from Castrovince. Not a fan of quoting entire blog entries but this one is just gold. We're lucky to have this guy covering the Tribe:


I covered my first Winter Meetings in Dallas in 2005 and quickly learned that the annual event makes for, without question, my least favorite week of the year. As a reporter covering the meetings, if you're not loitering in a hotel lobby and enduring endless small talk with fellow baseball scribes, you're chasing down a story on some rumor that, nine times out of 10, has little to no merit.


During those meetings in Dallas, I listened to a conversation between two newspaper reporters, who shall remain nameless in this space, discussing possible trade scenarios involving the clubs they covered.


"Would your team be interested in [Player X]," Reporter A would say.


"Possibly. Would your team have a need for [Player Z]," Reporter B would counter.


"Yeah, I think so."


The next day, I read, in disbelief, Reporter B's notes package, in which he mentioned a rumor that Reporter A's club was interested in Player Z. Now, maybe he had used that conversation as the basis for a discussion with a club source, who confirmed that, yes, Reporter A's team was interested in Player Z. Unfortunately, it's just as likely that he used the conversation as the basis for an empty rumor to satisfy his bosses and his readers.


(I apologize for the impromptu run through the alphabet above, but you get the idea.)


I'm not telling you anything you don't already know. Countless times over the course of the offseason, you, no doubt, read a rumor that never amounts to anything. And that very well might have been the case this week, with the reports that the Indians were interested in the Royals' Mark Teahen.


It began when the Kansas City Star reported on its Web site Sunday night that the Indians and Royals were discussing a trade involving Teahen. The [Cleveland] Plain Dealer picked up on the rumor and reported it as well. Yours truly then wrote a story for MLB.com, saying the rumor had been reported by multiple publications. And in my Monday mailbag column for Indians.com, I detailed what I felt the trade would mean for the Tribe, while being sure to point out that plenty of trades get discussed each offseason and very few get off the ground.


All of this happened within half a day.


Since then, Royals GM Dayton Moore has told MLB.com that the rumor is a "flat-out lie." And I just spoke with Indians GM Mark Shapiro, who made it pretty clear the Indians have not had one discussion with the Royals about Teahen.


I write all this, then, for two reasons. For one, I want to express one regret about my handling of the matter. Because I was citing other outlets' reports of the rumor (indeed, no one with the Indians would confirm it, on or off the record), I should have included a question mark in the headline on the blog posting below ("Tribe talkin' Teahen") and should have requested that such a question mark run alongside the headline to my story for MLB.com (if you haven't noticed, that question mark, for what it's worth, is up on the site now).


Other than the absence of that small, yet meaningful, punctuation mark, I feel I treated the Teahen situation as best I could, following up on the reports of two major metropolitan newspapers while never once citing the rumor as fact. I will leave the ultimate judgment of my handling of the matter up to you.


The other, more pressing reason I'm writing all this is to express my concern over the way incorrect information so often spreads in this day and age. This is no new phenomenon, of course, but, as we enter the winter Hot Stove season, it's certainly worth mentioning. Over the course of the next few months, you will see the Indians linked to many a free agent and/or trading partner. I will do my best to use my resources to sort rumor from fact and to make it clear which is which in my reports on Indians.com and in this blog.


But as I wrote in the mailbag and as we learned with the Teahen situation, you, as a fan and reader, are best-served to not get overly invested in any rumor until it becomes fact. Wasted energy, much like unsubstantiated reporting, is a bad thing. Take it from a guy who just spent two days writing about a trade that will probably never happen.


http://castrovince.mlblogs.com/archives ... muddy.html



Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Create New...