jcam222 Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 Does anyone else think we need to utilize him more? The kid seems to be a real gem. More passed in the flat, screens and even utilizing him as a scat back would be awesome I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalterWhite Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 I think we have struck gold with him. He leads all rookies in YPC and I think him and Hawkins have created problems for opposing defenses. With Gordon back, they will be even harder to cover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaak Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 I'm pretty sure that Gabriel leads all WR's in yards per catch at like 19.8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TypicalBrowns Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 Desean Jackson is the only other player with a higher YPC rating, 21.8 I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manzier Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 I really like Gabriel too. Looks solid and I dont think Ive seen him drop a ball yet. Has elusive speed too. From past Browns, Id have to say he kind of reminds me of Reggie Rucker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiott Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 Steal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 I really like Gabriel too. Looks solid and I dont think Ive seen him drop a ball yet. Has elusive speed too. From past Browns, Id have to say he kind of reminds me of Reggie Rucker Maybe- but to those who want to use him more- he's tiny by NFL standards- 5'8", 167. Gerald "Ice Cube" McNeil may be a better comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manzier Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 Maybe- but to those who want to use him more- he's tiny by NFL standards- 5'8", 167. Gerald "Ice Cube" McNeil may be a better comparison. wow....didn't realize he was that small. Thats exactly what Hawkins is. Wasn't McNeil a midget? more like 5-3" or 4-7" or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 He's small, but definitely a farmer win. We could probably use him to field punts too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 The quality of the subject of this post was known long before his time. Stick with this: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 Maybe- but to those who want to use him more- he's tiny by NFL standards- 5'8", 167. Gerald "Ice Cube" McNeil may be a better comparison. Yes, I was gonna say,Rucker was 6'2-6'3ish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 wow....didn't realize he was that small. Thats exactly what Hawkins is. Wasn't McNeil a midget? more like 5-3" or 4-7" or something? McNeil was 5'7'' 180 lbs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 Well, the Browns pretty much officially have a "Smurf" receiving corps: Andrew Hawkins 5'7" 180 Gabriel: 5'8" 167 Travis Benjamin: 5'10" 175 Marlon Moore 6'0" 190 Austin Miles 6'2" 215 Rodney Smith 6'5" 220 (seldom used though, no?) Gordon at 6'3" 225 will be the beast among the main contributors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 Another Gabe fan here, but the kid still has some technique work to do... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted November 4, 2014 Report Share Posted November 4, 2014 Well, the Browns pretty much officially have a "Smurf" receiving corps: Andrew Hawkins 5'7" 180 Gabriel: 5'8" 167 Travis Benjamin: 5'10" 175 Marlon Moore 6'0" 190 Austin Miles 6'2" 215 Rodney Smith 6'5" 220 (seldom used though, no?) Gordon at 6'3" 225 will be the beast among the main contributors. Aren't TE's part of the receiving corps?.. Our Tight ends are pretty big aren't they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted November 4, 2014 Report Share Posted November 4, 2014 As noted elsewhere, I have created a nickname for him: "The Archangel" Like it? Hate it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBrown Posted November 4, 2014 Report Share Posted November 4, 2014 Love this kid, speed and hands been safe so far plus made some good very blocks too. He's a little terrier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hx214 Posted November 4, 2014 Report Share Posted November 4, 2014 As noted elsewhere, I have created a nickname for him: "The Archangel" Like it? Hate it? I see what you did there! I like it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kennel Club Posted November 4, 2014 Report Share Posted November 4, 2014 As noted elsewhere, I have created a nickname for him: "The Archangel" Like it? Hate it? I like it Gipper! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaak Posted November 4, 2014 Report Share Posted November 4, 2014 Love it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibleedbrown Posted November 5, 2014 Report Share Posted November 5, 2014 As noted elsewhere, I have created a nickname for him: "The Archangel" Like it? Hate it? I was actually going with the nickname Sledgehammer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted November 5, 2014 Report Share Posted November 5, 2014 I was actually going with the nickname Sledgehammer. If he were an offensive or defensive lineman that might be good.....but he is a smallish WR. Archangel seems more fitting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.