Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Another Democrat patronizing God when it's convenient


StinkHole

Recommended Posts

Convenient toward advancing an adgenda

 

"This encyclical stands as an urgent call for government, industry and the whole community to honor the responsibility to preserve God’s creation."- Nancy Pelosi

 

Oops Nancy...but isn't human life, you know, the fetus, Gods creation as well?

 

http://goldrushcam.com/sierrasuntimes/index.php/news/local-news/3600-democratic-leader-nancy-pelosi-comments-on-pope-francis-addressing-climate-crisis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hypocrisy is stunning. The problem I have with this woman is the same I have with Obama. They speak empty hollow words on so many issues. They do not seem to have a moral compass that guides them. If she was so concerned about human life she would not be so pro abortion. How is abortion "honoring our responsibility to preserve God's creation".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree, but with the dems being so anti-American status quo, as in

way extreme on the left...

 

it makes it far more threatening that the dems do it, rather than just reps who do it

to be on the right side of things for their careers.

 

Like most every anti-conservative cause the left promotes, they use words regardless

of their definitions, to sway others, if they can, to their ulterior motives agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree, but with the dems being so anti-American status quo, as in

way extreme on the left...

 

it makes it far more threatening that the dems do it, rather than just reps who do it

to be on the right side of things for their careers.

 

Like most every anti-conservative cause the left promotes, they use words regardless

of their definitions, to sway others, if they can, to their ulterior motives agenda.

I will say this, Democrats are very likely just invoking God etc. to appeal to minorities who still have a strong connection to church. Reps and Dems both pander but this type of pandering is geared towards one particular demographic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Convenient toward advancing an adgenda

 

"This encyclical stands as an urgent call for government, industry and the whole community to honor the responsibility to preserve God’s creation."- Nancy Pelosi

 

Oops Nancy...but isn't human life, you know, the fetus, Gods creation as well?

 

http://goldrushcam.com/sierrasuntimes/index.php/news/local-news/3600-democratic-leader-nancy-pelosi-comments-on-pope-francis-addressing-climate-crisis

 

so having the notion we shouldn't destroy the planet we live on makes it impossible to be pro choice then in your warped little infantile mind?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"This encyclical stands as an urgent call for government, industry and the whole community to honor the responsibility to preserve God’s creation."- Nancy Pelosi

 

I used the term hypocrisy because she is so concerned about preserving God's creation (the earth) however when God created the earth and universe the crown jewel of His creation was mankind. She has no problem with the killing of human life in the womb. I don't know if hypocrisy is the proper word but what do you call someone like this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so having the notion we shouldn't destroy the planet we live on makes it impossible to be pro choice then in your warped little infantile mind?

Look up moron, it went over you head again. If the environment is Gods creation, then so must be children. What word didn't you understand?

"Destroying the planet" is not the point here. Using God to advance that agenda is you dork.

 

I suppose a hypocrite cant recognize hypocrisy when he sees it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look up moron, it went over you head again. If the environment is Gods creation, then so must be children. What word didn't you understand?

 

And what is the mother then? Just baby chattle? She is also gods creation with her own mind, body and soul. If it's not right for her to have a child than it's not right. With your argument the next logical step is going all the way over to the right and saying that women have zero say in procreation...they can be raped at will and while the perpetrator may be punished she will still have to bear his child. If she is imminently going to die from the pregnancy no matter, she "Must" carry the child because it and only it is the will of god...the womans life is not even secondary in consideration. Anything to further the species.

 

 

 

 

yeah we went through this before, no thanks. They were called the dark ages for a reason.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And what is the mother then? Just baby chattle? She is also gods creation with her own mind, body and soul. If it's not right for her to have a child than it's not right. With your argument the next logical step is going all the way over to the right and saying that women have zero say in procreation...they can be raped at will and while the perpetrator may be punished she will still have to bear his child. If she is imminently going to die from the pregnancy no matter, she "Must" carry the child because it and only it is the will of god...the womans life is not even secondary in consideration. Anything to further the species.

 

 

 

 

yeah we went through this before, no thanks. They were called the dark ages for a reason.

 

It's not about that though, I think most 'pro-life' people would agree that if the baby poses a legitimate threat to the life of the mother, then the mother's life comes first. The issue comes when you get the impression of people using it as a post-fact birth control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

. The issue comes when you get the impression of people using it as a post-fact birth control.

 

Oh I despise when it's used like that. The problem is that even the morning after pill is then lumped in the same with an 8 month abortion. I could totally get on board with a limit on late term abortions "only" in cases of rape, incest and imminent health of the mother. But that would have to be etched into a stone somewhere like the 10 commandments. Otherwise it's like a year before righties want to get rid of all abortions. That's why I side with liberals cause if I would quite literally murder any man who told me my wife or my daughter or whatever that had just been savagely raped couldn't get an abortion if she became pregnant from it. I have zero doubts in my own mind that in such a case I would make Isis pukes blush at my savagery. For you GOT degenerates, picture the big dude sticking his thumbs all up in the eye socket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what is the mother then? Just baby chattle? She is also gods creation with her own mind, body and soul. If it's not right for her to have a child than it's not right. With your argument the next logical step is going all the way over to the right and saying that women have zero say in procreation...they can be raped at will and while the perpetrator may be punished she will still have to bear his child. If she is imminently going to die from the pregnancy no matter, she "Must" carry the child because it and only it is the will of god...the womans life is not even secondary in consideration. Anything to further the species.

 

 

 

 

yeah we went through this before, no thanks. They were called the dark ages for a reason.

 

Blah blah blah blah ...so now you wanna open up an abortion debate? Nice try with the deflection but not interested.

 

Enjoy listening to yourself babble.

 

At least when conservatives use God, they mean it...and meaning it is what annoys the fuck out of you tards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blah blah blah blah ...so now you wanna deflect and open up an abortion debate? Not interested.

 

Enjoy listening to yourself babble.

 

well but that's at the crux of the issue if you're claiming that Pelosi can't be pro choice on one hand and then say we have to protect this creation we've been blessed with on the other.

 

That's alright though, I know analytical thought is hard. No sense pulling something this early on a Monday morning. Maybe by Friday those hammy's will be warmed up enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not about that though, I think most 'pro-life' people would agree that if the baby poses a legitimate threat to the life of the mother, then the mother's life comes first. The issue comes when you get the impression of people using it as a post-fact birth control.

Which it is.

 

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it might help.

Of course birth control is almost free and easily available, but if you're too fucking lazy...

 

WSS

 

what's healthier for the woman though? a pill she has to take once a month that does mess around with her hormones.....or a good healthy pounding in the butt?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'd be ducking flying heels right now if a woman heard me saying this rofl

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, there's not really a parallel there.

Really? So you think that there is a substantial number of people who are better off in an auto accident if they are not wearing a seatbelt? And a significant number of the thousands upon thousands of illegitimate birth are due to conscientious women being failed by properly used birth control methods? Or having been denied access to abortion?

 

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...