LogicIsForSquares Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 The Liberty Council is making some decent scratch right now from people who are terrified of change. I need to get in on this and make my own nonprofit. I will be driving a Lexus paid for by people who have no clue that they can't overturn this decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 Marriage, also called matrimony or wedlock, is a socially or ritually recognized union or legal contract between spouses that establishes rights and obligations between them, between them and their children, and between them and their in-laws.[1] And what exactly is wrong with that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 4, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 Therefore, a REAL MARRIAGE entails responsibilites to the children, if the man and woman do have children, which is ALWAYS, for the most part, possible, unless surgery or something amiss causes it not to work out. Now, m-m, w-w, can NOT POSSIBLY bear children. It's a biological impossibility. Always Absolutely impossible. Therefore, calling a civil union a "marriage" is a farce, and a deliberate culture war perversion of the true meaning of the word. I have now kicked your sissypants ass to the top of Ben Nevis, then into the English Channel, then all the way back to Westminster tower near Big Ben. STFU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 Marriage is a religious concept so I wish the government would just bail on it all together. Make every union between two people in the eyes of the law a civil union and let churches handle marriages. It would give gays what they want and religious folks would not have gays ruining their definition of marriage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 And we shouldn't have mixed race marriages either! That shits weird too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 4, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 Woodpecker - there is no gender to different colors of skin. Please get assistance with your trying to be a legit part of this board. As to what Logic said...I agree 100%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 Therefore, a REAL MARRIAGE entails responsibilites to the children, if the man and woman do have children, which is ALWAYS, for the most part, possible, unless surgery or something amiss causes it not to work out. Now, m-m, w-w, can NOT POSSIBLY bear children. It's a biological impossibility. Always Absolutely impossible. Therefore, calling a civil union a "marriage" is a farce, and a deliberate culture war perversion of the true meaning of the word. I have now kicked your sissypants ass to the top of Ben Nevis, then into the English Channel, then all the way back to Westminster tower near Big Ben. STFU That chess-playing pigeon is pretty spot on about now. So, marriage can only be between men and women because they'll have responsibility to their kids? So, should we prevent people who don't want kids getting married? Or just limit that to those who *can't* have kids? Like, people who have had ovarian/testicular cancer, old people, people who have been in any of a thousand or more different accidents? And are we just ignoring all the same sex couples who do actually have kids, through surrogacy, adoption or whatever? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 Also, westminster tower *is* where big ben is. Big Ben is the clock in westminster tower. If they were only 'near' that wouldn't go so well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 And we shouldn't have mixed race marriages either! That shits weird too... That was pretty stupid woody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blowe Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 That was pretty stupid woody. Shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browns149 Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 I don't recall a Church being FORCED to marry gay people. Maybe I'm wrong, as I don't search the internet 24 hours a day, for such things. And I don't receive emails from any political crap, on either side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 I don't recall a Church being FORCED to marry gay people. Maybe I'm wrong, as I don't search the internet 24 hours a day, for such things. And I don't receive emails from any political crap, on either side. Cal just posted a list of links. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browns149 Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 Cal just posted a list of links. Having read cal's posts, not one Church was forced to marry a gay couple in the USA. The one was a for-profit chapel, not a Church Another post is a proposed law about churches that rent out their buildings to the general public would not be allowed to discriminate “against a gay couple who want to rent the building for a party.” Again, they are not FORCED to marry a gay couple. Still haven't read or seen a CHURCH being FORCED to MARRY gay couples, in this country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 Why read and look into the info presented in an article when you can just google scary phrases and paste the best sounding article titles. Oh crap, I hope that post is up to Blowes standards. Maybe I should add some ranting and raving about my freedoms being taken away? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 Should also enforce the laws on the books banning blowjobs 'cause no good christian should get the bishop polished Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 Having read cal's posts, not one Church was forced to marry a gay couple in the USA. The one was a for-profit chapel, not a Church Another post is a proposed law about churches that rent out their buildings to the general public would not be allowed to discriminate “against a gay couple who want to rent the building for a party.” Again, they are not FORCED to marry a gay couple. Still haven't read or seen a CHURCH being FORCED to MARRY gay couples, in this country. You're not getting the point of the thread. That's right, churches being forced to marry gays is not happening in this country YET, and believers in traditional marriage want to keep it that way. Cals link proves the threat is there...one small step at a time. They been forced to in Europe and as you know we are always a step behind those "evolving" freaks. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/denmark/9317447/Gay-Danish-couples-win-right-to-marry-in-church.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 If it happens in Denmark we are next! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blowe Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 Why read and look into the info presented in an article when you can just google scary phrases and paste the best sounding article titles. Oh crap, I hope that post is up to Blowes standards. Maybe I should add some ranting and raving about my freedoms being taken away? If you knew how to read you would know that I wasn't defending MY freedoms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blowe Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 I could honestly give 2 shits about religion or gays. Neither immediately effect my life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 If you knew how to read you would know that I wasn't defending MY freedoms. Never said you were... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blowe Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 Yes you did in your flaccid attempt at insulting me. "Oh crap, I hope that post is up to Blowes standards. Maybe I should add some ranting and raving about my freedoms being taken away?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 5, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 I have a dim view of religion.... not spiritual beliefs. And I care about our country, our culture, our society. And those three things are going into the toilet, liberal wise. Time to turn around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 5, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 Yes you did in your flaccid attempt at insulting me. Blowe "Oh crap, I hope that post is up to Blowes standards. Maybe I should add some ranting and raving about my freedoms being taken away?" ************************************ "THUNK" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 If it happens in Denmark we are next! Yeah sure Woody. Europe has socialized medicine, now we get socialized medicine, Europe marries gays, now we marry gays...how absurd the notion that once Europes churches are forced to marry gays that we aren't far behind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 Yes you did in your flaccid attempt at insulting me. "Oh crap, I hope that post is up to Blowes standards. Maybe I should add some ranting and raving about my freedoms being taken away?" Again, not what I was doing.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 hang on with that Denmark ruling, is the fine print that "members of the church" should be able to get married within the church? So it is that church's were happy to take in gay people and their weekly donations, but when it came to marrying them no way? That's not right if they allow gay people to be open members of the church but refuse them marriages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 5, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 Sure it is. Allowing gays to attend is their choice. But being forced to condone a phony, perverse redefinition of marriage, no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 If you allow openly gay people to attend, therefore also taking their money....than imo you start to lose your moral standing in your opposition to their marriage request. Gray area than when they say they were open but church says "who knew we thought they were regular cunt slayers". Sure it is. Allowing gays to attend is their choice. But being forced to condone a phony, perverse redefinition of marriage, no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 The Europeans are coming! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blowe Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 Again, not what I was doing.. You're either crazy or stupid. I'm not really sure which one although I'm leaning towards crazy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.