StinkHole Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 Debbie Blabbermouth Shultz cant answer that question. For the second time she deflected. Maybe some of you liberal "intellectuals" can explain it. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/08/03/dnc-head-still-cant-explain-difference-between-democrats-socialists/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 Let's see about dictionary.com Liberalism: noun 1. the quality or state of being liberal, as in behavior or attitude. 2.a political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual,parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification ofpolitical, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricteddevelopment in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmentalguarantees of individual rights and civil liberties. 3. (sometimes initial capital letter) the principles and practices of a liberalparty in politics. 4.a movement in modern Protestantism that emphasizes freedom fromtradition and authority, the adjustment of religious beliefs to scientificconceptions, and the development of spiritual capacities Socialism: noun 1. a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting ofthe ownership and control of the means of production and distribution,of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole. 2.procedure or practice in accordance with this theory. 3.(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of asociety to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementationof collectivist principles. Actually that wasn't that hard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 Well that didn't really answer it did it? Reason being socialism has a pretty wide array of variables when you consider socialist countries one by one by one. If we are talking about Chris Matthews and Debbie Wasserman Schultz she was unable to draw a distinction between socialists as in Bernie Sanders and Democrats as in Hillary. It's a very blurry line at best no? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted August 4, 2015 Report Share Posted August 4, 2015 Well that didn't really answer it did it? Reason being socialism has a pretty wide array of variables when you consider socialist countries one by one by one. If we are talking about Chris Matthews and Debbie Wasserman Schultz she was unable to draw a distinction between socialists as in Bernie Sanders and Democrats as in Hillary. It's a very blurry line at best no? WSS I try not to argue political/social theory based on individual decisions because you get the Joe Manchins and Chris Smiths of the world. Politicians typically vote for what they believe will improve or solidify their position in the world. I would say the same for countries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 I try not to argue political/social theory based on individual decisions because you get the Joe Manchins and Chris Smiths of the world. Politicians typically vote for what they believe will improve or solidify their position in the world. I would say the same for countries. Of course that's correct bacon, I'm just commenting on the OP. Ironically I was watching Chris Matthews when that interchange took place. Frankly it surprised me that he called debbie Wasserman Schultz out on the carpet. But he did. She's kind of the Democrat version of Sarah Palin but she doesn't get nearly enough abuse. She just couldn't describe the difference between Bernie Sanders and Hillary, socialist vs Democrat. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 The huge difference is, surely Wasserman is 100 percent dishonest about her unlimited and asinine support of the dems and Obamao. Even Palin criticizes the reps a good bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 My point is that they both seem a little bit intellectually challenged at times and only Palin has been made a fool of by the left wing media. Debbie Wasserman Schultz has somehow avoided that treatment. Coincidence or political bias? The answer is clear to me. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 My point is that they both seem a little bit intellectually challenged at times and only Palin has been made a fool of by the left wing media. Debbie Wasserman Schultz has somehow avoided that treatment. Coincidence or political bias? The answer is clear to me. WSS If Wasserman Schultz becomes a serious Vice Presidential candidate you'll hear the pundits on right make more noise but she hasn't even risen to the Bachmann level yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 If Wasserman Schultz becomes a serious Vice Presidential candidate you'll hear the pundits on right make more noise but she hasn't even risen to the Bachmann level yet. But again allow me to refer you to the original post. Not the difference between a liberal and a Democrat but the difference between a socialist and he Democrat of which there are one of each running for the Democratic nomination. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 If Wasserman Schultz becomes a serious Vice Presidential candidate you'll hear the pundits on right make more noise but she hasn't even risen to the Bachmann level yet. Redsuxxxxxxx........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 But again allow me to refer you to the original post. Not the difference between a liberal and a Democrat but the difference between a socialist and he Democrat of which there are one of each running for the Democratic nomination. WSS The main difference for me is Sanders has been allowed to be the loose cannon who rails against the machine while Clinton understands that you aren't going to tear down the system and keep it running at the same time. Clinton supports higher tariffs on imports, Sanders wants an overhaul of the corporate tax code. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted August 5, 2015 Report Share Posted August 5, 2015 And I don't think Sanders will have any luck rearranging our system of government single handedly. Ironic that Hillary and Donald Trump are on the same page. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted August 6, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 If Wasserman Schultz becomes a serious Vice Presidential candidate you'll hear the pundits on right make more noise but she hasn't even risen to the Bachmann level yet. Oh please...Shultz is proof you can't fix stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted August 6, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 My point is that they both seem a little bit intellectually challenged at times and only Palin has been made a fool of by the left wing media. Debbie Wasserman Schultz has somehow avoided that treatment. Coincidence or political bias? The answer is clear to me. WSS Yep. The leftist run media will never make a fool out of one of their own, no matter how outrageously stupid they sound, yet the left went to extremes to try and tear down Palin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted August 6, 2015 Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 And I don't think Sanders will have any luck rearranging our system of government single handedly. Ironic that Hillary and Donald Trump are on the same page. WSS I think that being married to the President and Secretary of State illuminate the need to compromise on some level. Sanders has been lucky that he can act like the Democrat version of Rand Paul and his constituents eat it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted August 6, 2015 Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 Yep. The leftist run media will never make a fool out of one of their own, no matter how outrageously stupid they sound, yet the left went to extremes to try and tear down Palin. You must hate Nascar with all the left in it. Sarah Palin became a caricature of her own accord, she didn't need the media to tear her down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted August 6, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 Wasserman Schultz no doubt bears a striking resemblance to her great great grandfather Sgt. Schultz. The stupid gene is strong in the Schultz lineage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browns149 Posted August 6, 2015 Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 You must hate Nascar with all the left in it. Sarah Palin became a caricature of her own accord, she didn't need the media to tear her down. Exactly, all she had to do was speak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted August 6, 2015 Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 I imagine the free shit voters will love Bernie. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 6, 2015 Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 Exactly, all she had to do was speak ******************************************** You ever heard WassermanShultz speak? Seriously? http://humanevents.com/2011/04/16/top-10-outrageous-debbie-wasserman-schultz-quotes/ http://notallowed2laff.blogspot.com/2011/11/stupid-things-liberals-say-debbie.html http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/05/perhaps_the_most_despicable_thing_debbie_wasserman_schultz_has_said_yet_comments.html hahahaha https://youtu.be/oQz13LO-Y70 https://youtu.be/cdLpFuIY3IM https://youtu.be/VoWLhAfvlIk https://youtu.be/r5NJF5Fcvmg lol https://youtu.be/r5NJF5Fcvmg http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/democrats-debbie-wasserman-schultz-111077.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted August 6, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 You must hate Nascar with all the left in it. Sarah Palin became a caricature of her own accord, she didn't need the media to tear her down. The media went after her husband, kids, and misquoted her. Palins so called gaffe about Paul Revere became a major news story, and it turned out she was correct....then you have all this shit: http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2013/05/07/the-7-most-despicable-ways-liberals-have-attacked-sarah-palin-n1589064/page/full Ever hear Nancy Pelosi speak? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 6, 2015 Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 http://conservativebyte.com/2014/07/debbie-wasserman-schultz-embarrassed-live-tv/# LOL LOL LOL http://www.westernjournalism.com/debbie-wasserman-schultz-is-eating-her-own-words-after-midterms/ http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/04/politics/wasserman-schultz-walker-respond/index.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 6, 2015 Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blowe Posted August 6, 2015 Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 Those are the best! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted August 6, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 Liberals are ugly, especially the women. Their ugly inner spirit manifests itself through their faces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted August 6, 2015 Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 ^ backbone - cuz they cant find real men to run it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted August 6, 2015 Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 I imagine the free shit voters will love Bernie. WSS The funny thing is the free shit voters tend to vote Republican. If you look at the states who typically receive the most aid they go red. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted August 6, 2015 Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 The funny thing is the free shit voters tend to vote Republican. If you look at the states who typically receive the most aid they go red. Of course as we should know states dont vote. People do. I have no doubt that you will find in those states, the poorest ones, that the overwhelming majority of those who receive welfare vote Democrat. PS take the bottom seven states and do a little demographic research... WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted August 6, 2015 Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 Of course as we should know states dont vote. People do. I have no doubt that you will find in those states, the poorest ones, that the overwhelming majority of those who receive welfare vote Democrat. PS take the bottom seven states and do a little demographic research... WSS Top 20 Food Stamp States 13-7 Red 1. Mississippi - Red 2. Tennessee - Red 3. Oregon - Blue 4. New Mexico - Blue 5. Michigan - Blue 6. Louisiana - Red 7. Alabama - Red 8. Kentucky - Red 9. West Virginia - Red 10. Maine - Blue 11. Georgia - Red 12. South Carolina - Red 13. Arkansas - Red 14. Arizona - Red 15. Florida - Blue 16. Oklahoma - Red 17. Missouri - Red 18. Texas - Red 19. Washington - Blue 20. New York - Blue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted August 6, 2015 Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 I've seen that. I believe it. Take a look at the demographics of the state. The dirt poor and uneducated voters of the states that receive the lion's share of welfare are still, thankfully, a minority. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.