calfoxwc Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 "scientists" want Obamao to prosecute... mmgw skeptics. Don't even try to tell me they are just "scientists"...... http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/17/scientists-ask-obama-to-prosecute-global-warming-skeptics/#ixzz3m6i5gZfj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 The article references a similar situation regarding tobacco companies presenting misleading/false information to the public. Did you agree with that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 19, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 agree with what? The tobacco companies deliberately withheld facts of concern about tobacco. Like Virginia Slims and the ingredient developed in them that was addictive. On purpose. There isn't any deliberate withholding of climate information.. by skeptics. The withholding/blackballing of information that conflicts with their political mmgw bs... was done by the UN. Now, flap your wings, hop around, and sing the "I'm a little woodpecker and I'm so sorry" song. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 So you're all for cracking down on companies that fund flawed or misleading scientific research to paint their activities in a false positive light? Got it, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 19, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 so, woodpecker, you agree that people, espcially scientists, who refute the conclusions, quite honestly, of the mmgw UN suckup crowd.... should be prosecuted or not? Answer the freakin question. Use your little phone, and enter "y-e-s".... or "n-o".... If there is any drunken homeless people in your vicinity, ask them - they can probably help you better than you can help yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 i took a "mental shortcut" and thought about my wallet..... and thought the self ascribed "climate scientists" are really from the UN and the vaunted priesthood is really there to collect tithes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 19, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 yep. And, regarding the op - Chris and Woodypeckerhead give "bleeding heart liberal" resurgence in everyday intelligent, AMERICAN LOVING conversations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 so, woodpecker, you agree that people, espcially scientists, who refute the conclusions, quite honestly, of the mmgw UN suckup crowd.... should be prosecuted or not? Answer the freakin question. Use your little phone, and enter "y-e-s".... or "n-o".... If there is any drunken homeless people in your vicinity, ask them - they can probably help you better than you can help yourself. If they present legitimate data to attempt to refute what most climate scientists believe, then no, they obviously shouldn't be prosecuted. Their work would be scrutinized by their peers (like every other scientific paper), and the accuracy of their work would be determined. But, if groups with a very obvious reason to present conflicting results to the current consensus, fund flawed or misleading research, and then present it to the public, in an obvious attempt to promote their own agenda, then yeah... I think we should look into that. And, according to your earlier post, so do you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 19, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 not on climate change. It is not happening with skeptics. But the UN has blackballed legit research by prominent international scientists, simply because it didn't fit their political agenda. Why not be very quiet and READ SOMETHING ??? Hint. https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071221191858AASRgSr&p=un%20blackballs%20research Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 19, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 So, the UN has conflicting reasons to blackball skeptical information and scientists.... should the UN be PROSECUTED ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 not on climate change. It is not happening with skeptics. But the UN has blackballed legit research by prominent international scientists, simply because it didn't fit their political agenda. Why not be very quiet and READ SOMETHING ??? Hint. https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071221191858AASRgSr&p=un%20blackballs%20research A link to Yahoo answers that has a link to the Heartland Institute... You're just doing this on purpose now... You're asking why a random group, with no credibility, funded by the Heartland Institute, wasn't allowed to just talk at the UN? Then, of course, this shows up as news on Heartland's website.... This on is so fucking obvious Cal... please don't be this dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 20, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2015 then wise up, woodpecker. I just asked you a question about the UN. The UN is black balling scientists - you think THAT is okay, then? then you are totally being a hypocrite. Your point was about deliberately changing/etc information, then maybe they should be prosecuted. So, I showed you that the UN did it. But that fits with your politics, so you flip beak. Asshole woodypeckerhead pecks again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted September 20, 2015 Report Share Posted September 20, 2015 UN isnt black balling(?) any scientists. A group of individuals, maybe scientists, who knows, funded by the Heartland Institute, which itself is a right wing "think tank" funded by oil and gas companies with the sole purpose of discrediting climate change, weren't allowed to speak at the UN. Do you think every group should be able to speak at the UN? If there is legitimate research being done by legitimate scientists, I imagine the scientific community would be more than happy to review it. Blatantly biased, oil company funded groups with the single purpose of confusing the population at large (like you), does not really fall into that category. The positive here is that there are many people that can easily see through this. I'm going to assume that includes most people of prominence in the scientific community. The negative is that there are many gullible people, that want to make everything us vs them, and will stay lock step with their party no matter what (you) that are easily manipulated and have the ability to vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 20, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2015 if their studies are significant, and legit, yes. The excuse is flimsy.... "oh..er...we don't approve of....well...any source that enables any study that doesn't agree with". You science denier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted September 20, 2015 Report Share Posted September 20, 2015 If their study was legitimate and had the potential to change the conclusions thousands of other independent studies reached, I imagine it would have been heard. Somewhere, at some point. But that's not what that was... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 20, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2015 yes, you are a political leftie bigot who favors political bigotry as long as it fits your sissy woodypeckerhead agenda. We get it. Now stop it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted September 20, 2015 Report Share Posted September 20, 2015 I am going to count that as 1. Just try to think things like this through. This is about as blatant as it gets for bias being used in place of actual research. I am going to guess a group needs some amount of credibility before it can speak at the UN. No amount of right wing or oil lobby funding is going to reverse the research and conclusions the vast, vast majority of climate scientists have found. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 20, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2015 bs. You are rationalizing being a political bigot scince denier. To me, it doesn't matter who it is that shows the honest flip side of "mmgw". But your candyass woodpeckerish excuses are nearly amusing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted September 21, 2015 Report Share Posted September 21, 2015 2 you just don't get it. i'm out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 21, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 21, 2015 bs. You are rationalizing being a political bigot scince denier. To me, it doesn't matter who it is that shows the honest flip side of "mmgw". But your candyass woodpeckerish excuses are nearly amusing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted September 21, 2015 Report Share Posted September 21, 2015 The fact that people are objecting so strongly to the potential investigation of companies that misleading the general public for monetary gains speaks volumes about the ability of those companies to manipulate and mislead. Because there's absolutely no reason for the companies standing to profit hugely from climate change not being real would have absolutely no reason to influence the findings to show climate change not being real, and there's no precedent for anything like that from tobacco and lead companies. Never mind the fact that that the OP and link jumped from 'companies deliberately misleading the public for profit' to 'anyone that disagrees' as if they are the same thing. Most climate scientists (hell, most scientists) welcome legitimate challenges to their findings, because the more robust the challenge, the more confidence you can have if it holds up. But sure, it's all a hoax to steal your money, concocted by and agreed upon by scientists all around the world, placing phoney evidence like reduced land ice, loss of habitat, California being generally on fire, polar vortices, so that governments can tax you...smh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 21, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 21, 2015 Well, that is a good point, Chris, but it is also true on the flip side. Look at Al Gore's investments. Look at the left's culture war for redistribution of wealth around the globe, and here in our country, more money to fund "social justice" - a liberal monicer for "give out free stuff for votes". http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/091415-771013-climate-change-is-a-shakedown-not-based-on-science.htm http://usconservatives.about.com/od/environment/a/Why-Conservatives-Are-Skeptical-Of-Man-made-Global-Warming.htm https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071022190918AA7mLnp&p=who%20stands%20to%20make%20money%20in%20man%20made%20global%20warming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted September 22, 2015 Report Share Posted September 22, 2015 How topical - Volkswagen have been 'fixing' emission test results in order to comply with the rules on particle emissions. They've been fined something like $18bn for it. Anybody object? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted September 22, 2015 Report Share Posted September 22, 2015 How topical - Volkswagen have been 'fixing' emission test results in order to comply with the rules on particle emissions. They've been fined something like $18bn for it. Anybody object? Certainly not from those who are benefiting from the 18 billion dollar windfall. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted September 22, 2015 Report Share Posted September 22, 2015 I'm sure it was an honest mistake by a superior German company. A charge perpetuated by jealous people from an inferior culture and pedigree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.