Clevfan4life Posted January 3, 2016 Report Share Posted January 3, 2016 That one hurts as much as passing on Watt. Both players were also projected to go to the Browns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted January 3, 2016 Report Share Posted January 3, 2016 They were? Commonly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 3, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2016 They were? Commonly? They thought Watt would get picked by the Browns, but didn't Mangini pass cause he thought Watt wouldn't work in a 3-4? lols. And yeah we were expected to take either Mack or Watkins with our pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted January 3, 2016 Report Share Posted January 3, 2016 So now it's Mack or Watkins in 2014... Granted there were many mocks that had us taking Sammie at #4, but there were precious few projections I remember having Mack falling to 4. I remember more scenarios where teams traded up to #1 with HOU to take Mack there. But HOU got stuck at 1 and couldn't resist Clowney. Then StL bought the Robinson hype. Then JAX really shook things up taking Bortles at #3. I remember precious little chatter about Watt coming to us back in 2011, but TBH I wasn't paying too much attention back then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andeftw Posted January 3, 2016 Report Share Posted January 3, 2016 The general point is that when you have a top 6 pick from 2011 to 2014 you could have come away with any of these players: 2011 - Julio Jones, Tyron Smith, JJ Watt, Robert Quinn 2012 - Luke Kuechly, Dontari Poe, Fletcher Cox 2013 - bad draft in general, give this one a pass 2014 - Sammy Watkins, Khalil Mack, OBJ, Aaron Donald, Zack Martin, CJ Mosley The only player who had a minimal impact for the Browns this season in Mingo. Blame it on Pettine (or previous coaches) all you want, but it starts with front office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 3, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2016 i remember Watt was on some boards going to us at 10, if i'm remembering correctly. Mack was potentially expected to go higher than where the Browns were picking, but if either Watkins or Mack was still there the draft pundits said there's no way we''re passing either of those guys up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted January 3, 2016 Report Share Posted January 3, 2016 Fair enough... The general point is that when you have a top 6 pick from 2011 to 2014 you could have come away with any of these players: ... General point is hindsight is 20/20... In its light there were Day Two players we'd be better off with had we taken them Day One, but they went where they were projected to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andeftw Posted January 3, 2016 Report Share Posted January 3, 2016 Fair enough... General point is hindsight is 20/20... In its light there were Day Two players we'd be better off with had we taken them Day One, but they went where they were projected to go. That's true and all, but Jones, Kuechly and Watkins/Mack were pretty much sure things when they were coming out. I'm not referring to Day 2/3 players who proved to be good players. All of the players I mentioned were basically top 15 picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 4, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 i didn't realize Kuechly was highly touted out of college, is that true? Watkins and Mack were basically blue chip "you can't fucking be serious on not picking these guys" kind of players. Missing Kuechly obviously sucks but it's not the same as passing on Mack and Watkins. For that matter neither is passing on Watt. Watt was a highly touted 4-3 DE coming out of Wisconsin, but Mangini had us in a 3-4. Watt is just one of those guys that went way over his perceived potential even though he was like the 10th pick or something like that. Nobody called that he would excel as a 5 tech 3-4 DE. But Mack would have been perfect for Pettine's 3-4. Had Pettine gone to the mat to pick Mack and we took him, or hell even Watkins...he might still have his job today. That Gilbert pick likely is what sealed the deal considering we're now hearing Gilbert refused to play today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 Kuechly was highly regarded, but has managed to turn out to be even better than some of his biggest boosters thought he'd be. I'm still remembering a lot of questions about Watt as he came out early after only two years at Wisconsin at DE and was a TE in the MAC the year before those. His resume was thin. And it wasn't like his Wisconsin numbers were insanely good either. Honors wise he won the Lott and was 2nd team all-American... both in 2010. He did, however, raise eyebrows at the Combine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andeftw Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 Kuechly was highly regarded, but has managed to turn out to be even better than some of his biggest boosters thought he'd be. I'm still remembering a lot of questions about Watt as he came out early after only two years at Wisconsin at DE and was a TE in the MAC the year before those. His resume was thin. And it wasn't like his Wisconsin numbers were insanely good either. Honors wise he won the Lott and was 2nd team all-American... both in 2010. He did, however, raise eyebrows at the Combine. Not using Watt in my argument exactly because nobody expected him to be as good as he is now. But Jones, Kuechly and Mack were all regarded as studs and look where they are now, top 3 at their respective positions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBrown Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 Trade down was fine if you take Aaron Donald or Beckham jr Gilbert lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andeftw Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 Trade down was fine if you take Aaron Donald or Beckham jr Gilbert lol Sure but Donald has no fit in a 3-4 and OBJ has gone far beyond what anyone could have expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 Not using Watt in my argument exactly because nobody expected him to be as good as he is now. But Jones, Kuechly and Mack were all regarded as studs and look where they are now, top 3 at their respective positions. Mack was far from a sure thing. He'd been playing in very mediocre competition and there was doubt over whether he'd be able to step up to the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 "Meh" We need to forget the coulda, woulda, shoulda stuff. Yea we could have hired Bruce Arians and had aaron rodgers and all the damn studs. But we don't, so lets continue to get drunk and falsely get excited about next year...and the next year...and the next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBrown Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 Sure but Donald has no fit in a 3-4 and OBJ has gone far beyond what anyone could have expected. On a related note I was hoping we go back to a 4-3, what would that mean for Shelton ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 On a related note I was hoping we go back to a 4-3, what would that mean for Shelton ? Trouble. And/or a crash diet where he loses about 50 lbs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBrown Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 Trouble. And/or a crash diet where he loses about 50 lbs. So we've drafted a guy in the first round to play in a 3-4 then sacked the coach. What if the next coach doesn't want to run it, ffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 So we've drafted a guy in the first round to play in a 3-4 then sacked the coach. What if the next coach doesn't want to run it, ffs I think part of the requirements will be to get the best out of the talent we have. Any coach that comes here and tries to fit players to a system won't do well, that's for sure. We have players who have certain talents, we need to put them in a position to demonstrate those talents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 4, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 Mack was far from a sure thing. He'd been playing in very mediocre competition and there was doubt over whether he'd be able to step up to the NFL. i'm gonna disagree with you there. He tore up OSU and his combine was outstanding. If not for that OSU game and one other I believe, yeah you would be right. But on the big stage he utterly tore shit up. Rookie year, one of the best run stoppers at OLB'er. 2nd year...now he's one of the best pass rushers. Holy fuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 i'm gonna disagree with you there. He tore up OSU and his combine was outstanding. If not for that OSU game and one other I believe, yeah you would be right. But on the big stage he utterly tore shit up. Rookie year, one of the best run stoppers at OLB'er. 2nd year...now he's one of the best pass rushers. Holy fuck. Yeah it was that OSU game that elevated him really. A good career against meh competition would have been fine and dandy, but the OSU game gave teams faith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 4, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 Trouble. And/or a crash diet where he loses about 50 lbs. He's been in there with Meder at DT when we run 4-3 looks. I don't think it would affect him at all. If anything I would think it would make him even more effective as he'll see less doubles. As a 3-4 NT you are double teamed every single down pretty much, unless you suck. Two effective two gapping DT's makes for a nasty 4-3 if you pair them with competent DE's. ie cincy's 4-3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 Agree, I think Shelton will be fine Too much is made out of the 3-4/4-3 thing. It comes down more to utilization of the talent you have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 You know, I coulda been a Victoria Secrets Model if I had grown wings and a pussy. But I have neither.....so what is the point of regret? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 4, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 You know, I coulda been a Victoria Secrets Model if I had grown wings and a pussy. But I have neither.....so what is the point of regret? because people want to, again, forego immediate production in favor of projects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 Mack was far from a sure thing. He'd been playing in very mediocre competition and there was doubt over whether he'd be able to step up to the NFL. There were doubters to be sure, but he was closer to "surefire" that almost any other player in his draft... at least that's what I remember. OBJ had an injury question circling him going into the draft. ... so lets continue to get drunk and falsely get excited about next year...and the next year...and the next year. Finally a plan near and dear to a Browns' fans' heart... and liver... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted January 4, 2016 Report Share Posted January 4, 2016 because people want to, again, forego immediate production in favor of projects. ... plus we all want to make the picks we hit upon known to others... And Shelton will be fine... I know... I wanted to pick him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.