The Cysko Kid Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/02/08/pro-choice-group-cries-foul-over-doritos-commercial-ultrasound.html For "humanizing" human fetuses. Because it's easier to kill that child if you deny that it's human, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Except that baby looks pretty developed. It's way passed the point the vast majority thinks the cutoff for abortions should be. Hell, that was probably a birth by Doritos. I get the complaint they're trying to make, but it doesn't make it any less idiotic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/02/08/pro-choice-group-cries-foul-over-doritos-commercial-ultrasound.html For "humanizing" human fetuses. Because it's easier to kill that child if you deny that it's human, of course. The original lie from the abortionists was that a fetus was only a blob of tissue but with ultra sounds the public got to see that there is an actual baby in the womb and not some blob of tissue. I read a testimony years ago from a minister who jumped on the pro abortion wagon in the 70's and volunteered to work at an abortion clinic. He said he was horrified when he saw little arms and legs being sucked out because he thought it would just be a blob of tissue. He then became a supporter of pro life and is active in his church to promote pro life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 The original lie from the abortionists was that a fetus was only a blob of tissue but with ultra sounds the public got to see that there is an actual baby in the womb and not some blob of tissue. I read a testimony years ago from a minister who jumped on the pro abortion wagon in the 70's and volunteered to work at an abortion clinic. He said he was horrified when he saw little arms and legs being sucked out because he thought it would just be a blob of tissue. He then became a supporter of pro life and is active in his church to promote pro life. That depends entirely on the age of the foetus. An egg and a sperm do not instantly magically change in to a baby with arms and legs at the moment of conception. It starts as a fertilised egg, which splits in two, repeatedly, until it's big enough to start specialising cells, which is when you start to see vague baby shapes. So to say it's not a blob is untrue. To think it never has arms and legs is also obviously untrue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Also, at no point does the commercial talk about abortion, so be quiet people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 That depends entirely on the age of the foetus. An egg and a sperm do not instantly magically change in to a baby with arms and legs at the moment of conception. It starts as a fertilised egg, which splits in two, repeatedly, until it's big enough to start specialising cells, which is when you start to see vague baby shapes. So to say it's not a blob is untrue. To think it never has arms and legs is also obviously untrue. Which makes many democrats position of legal abortions right up to delivery even more reprehensible. Personally I get tired of the liberal media with their endless abortion questions towards conservatives as being extreme on abortion but never asking abortion questions for democrats who want abortions right up to delivery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 And as much as those people would want late term abortions, the majority are against it, same with the no abortions at all people. People are happy with abortions so long as it's not late term, as long as the foetus isn't really developed enough to have a chance to survive outside the womb. Which happens to also be where the limit is in most places, around 50% viability (24 weeks), which is about as balanced a solution as can be expected. I could see it being moved back to 20 weeks or something, but somewhere around there is fine by most people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Which makes many democrats position of legal abortions right up to delivery even more reprehensible. Personally I get tired of the liberal media with their endless abortion questions towards conservatives as being extreme on abortion but never asking abortion questions for democrats who want abortions right up to delivery. Who wants abortions right up to delivery? Surely not the majority Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Who wants abortions right up to delivery? Surely not the majority Probably some people do. Bell curves, and all that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Who wants abortions right up to delivery? Surely not the majority The democratic chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz for one: National Democratic Party Chair Supports Late-Term Abortions: No Limits “Period. End of Story” The head of the Democratic Party made it clear today. There should be no limits on abortion, period — and that includes no limits on abortions up to the day of birth apparently. http://www.lifenews.com/2015/04/08/national-democratic-party-chair-supports-late-term-abortions-no-limits-period-end-of-story/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 As I said, some people probably do. Also, I would have no objection to late term abortion if there is significant risk to the mother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 1.) The majority of people are in favor of abortion with restriction. IE only early in the pregnancy, etc. 2.) The no limits on abortion is a minority. 3) The no exceptions, no abortions period is also a minority. Personally, if you're pregnant for 7 months and decide "nah, I want an abortion now" then you can fuck off. The only exception should be if a complication arises and the life of the mother is in jeopardy. However, #1 is pretty much what we have now - groups #2 and #3 bitching is pretty much just noise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 1.) The majority of people are in favor of abortion with restriction. IE only early in the pregnancy, etc. 2.) The no limits on abortion is a minority. 3) The no exceptions, no abortions period is also a minority. Personally, if you're pregnant for 7 months and decide "nah, I want an abortion now" then you can fuck off. The only exception should be if a complication arises and the life of the mother is in jeopardy. However, #1 is pretty much what we have now - groups #2 and #3 bitching is pretty much just noise Yep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Doesn't Debbie Wasserman Schultze as the DNC Chair who said she believes there should be no restrictions on abortion speak for the position of the democratic party? The Democratic Party supports legal abortion until the baby is born, according to Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Read more at http://www.christianpost.com/news/democratic-leader-says-her-party-supports-legal-abortion-until-moment-of-birth-video-137579/#HyZYYi82JVK6r1hV.99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Which makes many democrats position of legal abortions right up to delivery even more reprehensible. Personally I get tired of the liberal media with their endless abortion questions towards conservatives as being extreme on abortion but never asking abortion questions for democrats who want abortions right up to delivery. most normal people think some late cutoff is acceptable unless the health of the mother is at stake. But there's still this lasting impression you conservatives have of the pro choice movement that you refuse to divest yourself of. You think people look at pregnant women and say "why hasn't that been aborted?". It's just not the case. The reason why some people want women to have those rights right up to delivery has more to do with the woman than it does with the pregnancy and wanting all fetus's aborted on principle. I know you guys don't agree with it, not expecting you to...but at least understand the oppositions "true" position. They often don't dispute facts about fetus viability, they're just saying that in the end it's the womans choice because it's her body the fetus comes out of. I know you guys want to keep dismissing that a woman is even mildly involved in all this....but do try to keep up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Also, at no point does the commercial talk about abortion, so be quiet people. precisely. I want to smack people who complained about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Doesn't Debbie Wasserman Schultze as the DNC Chair who said she believes there should be no restrictions on abortion speak for the position of the democratic party? The Democratic Party supports legal abortion until the baby is born, according to Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Read more at http://www.christianpost.com/news/democratic-leader-says-her-party-supports-legal-abortion-until-moment-of-birth-video-137579/#HyZYYi82JVK6r1hV.99 DWS represents Hillary Clinton, not the democratic party. A lot of democrats want her out. And I think saying "supports legal abortion until the baby is born" is a mischaracterization of out of context quotes by biased news sources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpkin Eater Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 That depends entirely on the age of the foetus. An egg and a sperm do not instantly magically change in to a baby with arms and legs at the moment of conception. It starts as a fertilised egg, which splits in two, repeatedly, until it's big enough to start specialising cells, which is when you start to see vague baby shapes. So to say it's not a blob is untrue. To think it never has arms and legs is also obviously untrue. They become a distinct person with unique DNA the moment of conception. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 I am for extreme late term abortions. Get mouthy at any time between 0-5 years and here comes the abortionator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 I am for extreme late term abortions. Get mouthy at any time between 0-5 years and here comes the abortionator. nice, post partem abortions ftw yo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 you gotta have something inbetween the abortionator though. I like Chris Rocks idea of having to go see the tossed salad man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 They become a distinct person with unique DNA the moment of conception. So is the woman who gives birth to the child. We've been through the "era" of women treated as baby chattel. It's a complicated issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpkin Eater Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 Um, okay? Well 99% of the time it's her irresponsibility that got her pregnant. The baby didn't ask to have a mother that killed it. It is innocent. The mother is not. The bottom line is be responsible for your actions. If you don't want kids and would rather kill your own child then deal with it then don't have sex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 Um, okay? Well 99% of the time it's her irresponsibility that got her pregnant. The baby didn't ask to have a mother that killed it. It is innocent. The mother is not. The bottom line is be responsible for your actions. If you don't want kids and would rather kill your own child then deal with it then don't have sex.Do you have a source to backup your "99%" claim? And anyone that doesn't want kids shouldn't have sex? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Mike Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 Also, at no point does the commercial talk about abortion, so be quiet people. Yep. It was just a commercial, & a funny one at that. What happened to the world that everything has to have "an agenda". People need to relax. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 What's really happening, is people demanding to be a victim, only to get the upper hand on issues. "X" is offensive, because they disagree. And the left hates to be disagreed with, because anti-status quo stances is what gives them purpose. They don't really care. Obamao was pro-real marriage. Between a man and a woman. Ever hear of gay rights groups going after him? Being "offended" ? Nope. Their offenses are all manufactured out of political expediency. They want their free stuff, and they want not to be ever held accountable for their own stupid actions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpkin Eater Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 Do you have a source to backup your "99%" claim? And anyone that doesn't want kids shouldn't have sex? Wtf are you talking about? Are you saying more than 1% of pregnancies are the result of rape? I doubt it but haven't checked any statistics. That would be the only time an unwanted pregnancy isn't the result of irresponsibility. Yes I'm saying if you don't want kids and can't responsibly deal with the result of sex than don't have it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 So sex is only for procreation, got it. There is also some middle ground between "Let's have a baby" and "rape". Finally, you still haven't backed up your numbers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 Yep. It was just a commercial, & a funny one at that. What happened to the world that everything has to have "an agenda". People need to relax. Mike I agree Mike. It was just a funny commercial but I suspected there might be some out there who would complain and sure enough there was. I used to like the funny superbowl commercials but I think political correctness and this idea of never trying to offend anyone has meant less funny SB commercials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.