Axe Posted August 16, 2016 Report Share Posted August 16, 2016 Won't matter to the lefties.. Nothing these two does will.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted August 16, 2016 Report Share Posted August 16, 2016 So their "giving" went from one pocket to the other pocket...these two crooks should never be anywhere near the White House. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted August 16, 2016 Report Share Posted August 16, 2016 I understand the suspicions, but Pocket? The Clinton Foundation is a registered charitable entity from which they report no income. It's not a savings account. The bulk of their income is from: Bill's speaking fees as booked through and paid by The Harry Walker Agency (Statement 7 on page 32); HRC's book deal(s) paid by Simon and Schuster (Statement 11 on page 36); HRC's speaking fees... again through Walker Agency (Statement 10 page 35); and Bill's consulting to two education concerns (Statement 9 page 34). Basically it's pretty long, but pretty bland stuff. https://m.hrc.onl/secretary/10-documents/01-health-financial-records/Clinton_2015_Form_1040_with_Signature_Page.pdf The claims made by Manafort about Foundation donors also being sources of income are true to an extent, but while not chump change to us, total less than 15% of their combined income and it was all Bill's for consulting. So if there is any "there" anywhere, it ain't here. For that someone needs to pull on the threads at The Walker Agency. Of course opinions may vary... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted August 16, 2016 Report Share Posted August 16, 2016 The Clinton foundation is the type of thing you get suicided for investigating too closely. Too many big international and US figures involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.