calfoxwc Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 http://constitution.com/latest-scientific-research-says-homosexuals-not-born-way-transgenderism-not-supported-science/ Why do so many liberals reject science? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 Well see you can't ask a baby if it's gay so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 Denunked invalid study. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2016/08/23/the-new-atlantis-study-on-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity-thats-not-a-study/ Not peer reviewed, written by bums who parsed and pulled what they wanted from carious other studies. So not science Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 Another gem brought to you by the ethical folks at tje costitution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 Is this not the same source as the other thread we have going on right now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 it wasn't debunked, it was argued against with rationalizations. It wasn't a "study", it was a "study of studies"... a lot like clinton's "definition of "is" is" liberals quibble over terms and redefine them to suit. "wasn't peer reviewed"... really. So, how to you get a review by peers when peers don't like the results of the study? they'll just bash it superficially, and reject it. It's how liberals roll. They will protect their liberal narrative like a mother bear and it's cubs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiamat63 Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 it wasn't debunked, it was argued against with rationalizations. It wasn't a "study", it was a "study of studies"... a lot like clinton's "definition of "is" is" liberals quibble over terms and redefine them to suit. "wasn't peer reviewed"... really. So, how to you get a review by peers when peers don't like the results of the study? they'll just bash it superficially, and reject it. It's how liberals roll. They will protect their liberal narrative like a mother bear and it's cubs. They argue against it.... with (wait for it) rationalizations. And the 'study of studies' bit gave me a huge laugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 I'm glad we're focusing on the important issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.