Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

New Study discredits temp adjustments - mmgw is a crock


calfoxwc

Recommended Posts

they calc'ed to show cooler 1940's... and warmer recent temps....

 

major farce.

 

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/exclusive-study-finds-temperature-adjustments-account-for-nearly-all-of-the-warming-in-climate-data/

 

EXCLUSIVE: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

"A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”

“Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.

 

The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.

Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.

Basically, “cyclical pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out” of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships and other sources."

 

ObaMao's EPA fraud power grab - undone, disgraced, was a big pile of crap.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and..... it was even published, and peer reviewed, a constant knee jerk defense mechanism for

so many liberals. I wonder what the next "objection" will be to maintain the phoney liberal mmgw religion....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So i looked at that study cal, and the very first undersigner was a phd innnn........economics. He has a BS in physics though so watch out. All the undersigners they're first designations, their phd's, were not in relateabke fields. I saw soneone had a minor in something but per usual, this is a dismissible report. I didnt even have to look at the report, soneone with a phd in evonomics does not get an iota of my attn when it comes to the warming debate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dr. James P. Wallace III Jim Wallace & Associates, LLC Ph.D., Economics, Minor in Engineering, Brown University M.S., Mechanical Engineering, Brown University B.S., Aeronautical Engineering, Brown University

 

 

That was one of the writers of the report, nit just an ubdersigner. His phd is, again, in economics. He has a masters in ME and a BS in aeronautical engineering. Sorry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“You would think that when you make adjustments you’d sometimes get warming and sometimes get cooling. That’s almost never happened,” said D’Aleo, who co-authored the study with statistician James Wallace and Cato Institute climate scientist Craig Idso.

 

I need a bigger font.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Early life and education

Joseph D’Aleo is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin, from which he received B.S. and M.S. degrees. He was a doctoral student in Air Resources at New York University, where he completed everything except his dissertation.[7]

D’Aleo was a professor of Meteorology and Climatology at Lyndon State College. [8] He was awarded an honorary PhD by Lyndon State College for his "accomplishments as an educator and a pioneer in the field of broadcast meteorology" [9]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"field of Broadcast meteorology". Weather isn't climate

 

Cato Institute? Oh, that makes sense. The same institute founded by a Koch brother and that received funding from Exonn Mobile.

 

 

Though even they admit man affects the climate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...