TexasAg1969 Posted October 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 10 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said: The Manafort Indictment: Not Much There, and a Boon for TrumpRead more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/453244/manafort-indictment-no-signs-trump-russia-collusion Watergate prosecutions started very slowly and deliberately as well and as each one rolled over it gained more and more momentum. There are no fools running this show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 33 minutes ago, TexasAg1969 said: Watergate prosecutions started very slowly and deliberately as well and as each one rolled over it gained more and more momentum. There are no fools running this show. Maybe not fools but too many liberal Clinton/Obama supporting prosecutors were hired by Mueller to run this show (fairly). Not to mention how a sealed grand jury indictment gets illegally leaked to CNN and the NY times (a felony) and nobody seems to care. Deep State Coup: Special Prosecutor Mueller Packs Team With Obama, Clinton Loyalists http://www.dailywire.com/news/17473/deep-state-coup-special-prosecutor-mueller-packs-john-nolte# Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 They have nothing to prove collusion on Trump. This could turn around and bite the dems in the butt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 VP Pence is ready and willing to take over, with VP Ivanka. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 oh, balarney. Nixon WAS guilty in the watergate stuff. Manafort did his stuff about 2 years before he ever worked for Trump. Not see difference? Here is what I see: Holder, MUELLER, are complicit in a dangerous deal to sell uranium after the russians paid the clinton's foundation 184 million. And higgardly the corrupt and the DNC paid about 9 million to a former British agent... to go "get" Trump with the dirtiest report possible - it was faked by russian agents. Mueller SIGNED onto the uranium one deal. Manafort helped negotiate the uranium one deal. ObaMao's dirty racist AG Lynch put the gag order on the FBI informant with all the evidence, threatening him with the destruction of his reputation and loss of his freedom....to keep him QUIET over uranium one. HOLDER signed onto the uranium one deal. Dirty Mueller's very close friend, COMEY, leaked the dossier to the media to ruin Trump, and by his own admission, to create reason to appoint a special prosecutor. Said dossier, was faked by russian agents, paid for by higgardly/clinton "foundation" and the DNC...follow the money. https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2017/10/25/why-was-obamas-justice-department-silent-on-criminal-activity-by-russias-nuclear-agency/#635e862ebe17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 This is going to be interesting because the liberal mainstream media no longer has a strangle hold and monopoly on the news. I don't think they will get away with railroading Trump but we'll see. As the MSM either willfully or ignorantly doesn't tell the full story we have new media today such as the internet, Fox news and talk radio that will tell the other side that the MSM who is just a mouthpiece for the democrats leave out of their reporting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 The bombshell truth is this: The dirty uranium deal is a blockbuster scandal. Guess who kept it all quiet? MUELLER himself. And ROSENSTEIN, who appointed MUELLER. and COMEY, the head of the FBI after MUELLER. Guess who has proof, plenty of documented proof - of all this? The FBI informant, who was gagged permanently to keep him from talking, even to our OWN GOV. Lynch gagged him to hide holder, obamao, rosenstein, comey, from them selling out American national security to dirty players of russia. Obamao's crew of deep state corrupt officials...there are far, far more indicting actions during the obaMAO corrupt years linking obamao to this, and there is little or nothing to link Trump to it. Corrupt deep state. Big serious trouble is now here. Mueller and rosenstein are desperately trying to cover their own involvement in the uranium one giant scandal. Lynch complied with whoever told her to gag the FBI informant and said evidence. Watergate is a grain of sand and the uranium one scandal is a deep state corrupt beach. https://extranewsfeed.com/president-trump-puts-hillary-and-dnc-on-defensive-for-russia-dealings-d2d80f520270 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 1 minute ago, calfoxwc said: The bombshell truth is this: The dirty uranium deal is a blockbuster scandal. Guess who kept it all quiet? MUELLER himself. And ROSENSTEIN, who appointed MUELLER. and COMEY, the head of the FBI after MUELLER. Guess who has proof, plenty of documented proof - of all this? The FBI informant, who was gagged permanently to keep him from talking, even to our OWN GOV. Lynch gagged him to hide holder, obamao, rosenstein, comey, from them selling out American national security to dirty players of russia. Obamao's crew of deep state corrupt officials...there are far, far more indicting actions during the obaMAO corrupt years linking obamao to this, and there is little or nothing to link Trump to it. Corrupt deep state. Big serious trouble is now here. Mueller and rosenstein are desperately trying to cover their own involvement in the uranium one giant scandal. Lynch complied with whoever told her to gag the FBI informant and said evidence. Watergate is a grain of sand and the uranium one scandal is a deep state corrupt beach. https://extranewsfeed.com/president-trump-puts-hillary-and-dnc-on-defensive-for-russia-dealings-d2d80f520270 And if the mainstream media still had it's strangle hold on news reporting we would not hear much about this. The MSM has given little to no coverage about this story. Thankfully today we have other sources of news and don't have to rely on the corrupt biased reporting of the liberal MSM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 Therefore, LYNCH, HOLDER, ROSENSTEIN, MUELLER, obaMAO, HIGGARDLY (who also had to sign off on the uranium one deal, after getting 184 MILLION DOLLARS donated to her foundation...and who paid for the faked dossier on Trump that was the sole basis for the current investigation of three Trump officials who were involved years before.... yep. Now, lynch used her position to cover up uranium one. THAT is the watergate comparison right there. Comey, rosenstein, and mueller kept the evidence secret of their own wrong doing. this is serious, folks. Our entire gov could possibly be at "legal civil war" ... BIG SERIOUS TROUBLE IS HERE. Have a nice day ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 Just now, OldBrownsFan said: And if the mainstream media still had it's strangle hold on news reporting we would not hear much about this. The MSM has given little to no coverage about this story. Thankfully today we have other sources of news and don't have to rely on the corrupt biased reporting of the liberal MSM. exactly. and that is why they HATE fox news, etc... it's because they can't control the message, hide their own corruption by controlling Fox news and other media sources that will tell the truth. Funny - some years ago, we had liberals on this board, who adamantly denied and ridiculed that there was any bias in the MSM. It used to be a cesspool, now it's "Niagara Falls" https://pjmedia.com/trending/lawyer-obama-doj-blocked-fbi-informant-talking-uranium-one-deal/ and......... debbie wassermannutjobflappyjaws Shultz. used to head the dnc. during the paying for the faked dossier on Trump:. (did I mention that the DNC helped pay for it?) to a former British agent...foriegn agent, Steele? https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2017/10/27/watch-debbie-wasserman-schultz-does-not-want-to-talk-about-the-trump-dossier/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 Moar DEEP STATE DEEP STATE URANUS I MEAN URANIUM URANIUM. Cals FSB controller is squawking hot over coms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 4 hours ago, OldBrownsFan said: The Manafort Indictment: Not Much There, and a Boon for TrumpRead more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/453244/manafort-indictment-no-signs-trump-russia-collusion Oh yeah yesterdays indictments have nothing at all to do with russian collusion. Did u actually read what happened or did u let a talking head at fox tell u what happened? The information coming from these indictments EXPLICITLY show not just russia's interest in affecting the last election but of the perfect willingness of the campaign to seek out their help, which is illegal. And trump knew this day was coming before he even won. When he stood up at a podium and hammered about how we should be focused on the content of the emails and not where they came from, he was setting the table for his eventual defense which is "who cares if the russians hacked hillary and gave me the emails". I know for a fact alot of u feel the same way u just dont have the balls, the man stuff, to admit it. As much as id like to see action get taken against hillary fir thise emails, doing so would then be an open invitation to every foreign actor out there to hack every election that happens in the u.s. I guarandamntee that if the chinese were found to hack something of trumps not a single obe of you would approve of legal action against trump based on the illegal aquisition of said info by some cyber slopes "with an agenda". Precisely as the russians are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 1 hour ago, Clevfan4life said: Oh yeah yesterdays indictments have nothing at all to do with russian collusion. Did u actually read what happened or did u let a talking head at fox tell u what happened? The information coming from these indictments EXPLICITLY show not just russia's interest in affecting the last election but of the perfect willingness of the campaign to seek out their help, which is illegal. And trump knew this day was coming before he even won. When he stood up at a podium and hammered about how we should be focused on the content of the emails and not where they came from, he was setting the table for his eventual defense which is "who cares if the russians hacked hillary and gave me the emails". I know for a fact alot of u feel the same way u just dont have the balls, the man stuff, to admit it. As much as id like to see action get taken against hillary fir thise emails, doing so would then be an open invitation to every foreign actor out there to hack every election that happens in the u.s. I guarandamntee that if the chinese were found to hack something of trumps not a single obe of you would approve of legal action against trump based on the illegal aquisition of said info by some cyber slopes "with an agenda". Precisely as the russians are. I don't think you read the article I posted. It was written by a former federal prosecutor and he knows what he is talking about. These charges involve Manafort and happened years before he was ever campaign manager (for a few months) for Trump. The only evidence of collusion with the Russians between a campaign is with the DNC and Hillary Clinton. They spent millions to get information from the Russians for a phony report on Trump that was false. What we don't know is if that false report was used by the FBI to get wiretaps on Trump Tower. You are right there is a big story but it is with Comey and the FBI, the DNC, Hillary Clinton and Loretta Lynch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 Oh u mean the report the republicans started? And the manafort/gates indictments show unbeleivable ties to the russians and they go hand in hand with the papidopoulus indictment. Game just getting started my friend. Yes the actual charge against manafort has nothing to do with trump until they can show that trump was knowledgeabke about his teams effirts to collude with the russians. they already stepped in Sheet trying to paint papo as a nobody trump didnt even know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 wait, they knew the russians were trying to screw around with our election back in 2009. and they covered it up because obaMao won. had he lost, they would have screamed "russian collusion". can't get a liberal to talk about uranium one and take it seriously. But if the REPS did uranium one, all liberal hell would break loose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 Source about the russians trying to hack the 2008 election? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Dawg Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 24 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said: Source about the russians trying to hack the 2008 election? Hell, I would settle on a source for the 2016 election Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted November 1, 2017 Report Share Posted November 1, 2017 5 hours ago, Canton Dawg said: Hell, I would settle on a source for the 2016 election Read the popodapolous indictment yourwelcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Dawg Posted November 1, 2017 Report Share Posted November 1, 2017 12 hours ago, Clevfan4life said: Read the popodapolous indictment yourwelcome. "Hack" and "collusion" are 2 different things. (you're welcome) Which one are you talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted November 1, 2017 Report Share Posted November 1, 2017 48 minutes ago, Canton Dawg said: "Hack" and "collusion" are 2 different things. (you're welcome) Which one are you talking about? Well, both actually. we know they tried to physically hack certain states election counts. PopaShmuckolus's emails show they were also trying to feed damaging info to one side of the election so we can be sure which outcome they were trying to hack if they did indeed get in. What pisses me off about russia is they knew full well the way they released hillarys Sheet ensured nothing criminally ever came up to ger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.