Issue 2. Does anybody care?

[Westside Steve]

http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2017/11/issue_2_vote_totals_1.html

[DieHardBrownsFan]

3 minutes ago, Westside Steve said:

http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2017/11/issue_2_vote_totals_1.html

My younger brother was for it because Sanders said it was a good deal.  Looks like the Pharm companies were against it, which means it probably was a good deal.  

[Westside Steve]

41 minutes ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:

My younger brother was for it because Sanders said it was a good deal.  Looks like the Pharm companies were against it, which means it probably was a good deal.  

Yes the only reason I even looked into it as because Dennis kucinich came out in favor of it. I respect Dennis kucinich but I almost never agree with him and I for sure have no hatred of the pharmaceutical companies.

If you force the makers of any product to eliminate profit they will find something else to make or invest in. Lots of Americans are stupid and think he will get the best and most advanced products in the world without paying for them.

WSS

[calfoxwc]

the bill was flawed, and the idea that the state has to pay for lawsuits over prices, whatever - was dumb.

That would encourage frivolous lawsuits out the wazoo from one side or the other over pharm prices.

Not a solution to the problem, so I was against it.

[DieHardBrownsFan]

Of course that could be cowpoop.