ballpeen Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/...en--hes-29.html Figures, is all I can say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 He be a playa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 It figures that stuff happens in societies that have no consequences. England's welfare state is a few years beyond ours but I'd bet that state enforced child support VS prison might just slow that behavior down a tad. WSS -------------------- www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/westsidesteve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. T Posted May 31, 2009 Report Share Posted May 31, 2009 Was his name Majic Johnson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB&J Posted May 31, 2009 Report Share Posted May 31, 2009 It figures that stuff happens in societies that have no consequences. England's welfare state is a few years beyond ours but I'd bet that state enforced child support VS prison might just slow that behavior down a tad. WSS Desmond Hatchett's brood came to light after authorities in Tennessee in the U.S. took him to court for non-payment of child support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 31, 2009 Report Share Posted May 31, 2009 The name of the geographical location was changed to protect the innocent, obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosar_For_President Posted June 1, 2009 Report Share Posted June 1, 2009 Was his name Majic Johnson? No man, it's Shawn Kemp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted June 1, 2009 Report Share Posted June 1, 2009 Desmond Hatchett's brood came to light after authorities in Tennessee in the U.S. took him to court for non-payment of child support. So what?? This is how many years since kid #1? And the state shoulda been chaging him from the time that the first one squirted out. It's up to the state to recoup tghe welfare each mother is getting and should be from the start whether she presses charges or not. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted June 1, 2009 Report Share Posted June 1, 2009 Sounds like he was in the business of giving young single women a baby so they could make $$ in living expenses from the gov. Not good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.