Global warming deniers. Just stop.

[Gorka]

U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed.
Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ″eco- refugees,′ ′ threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP.
He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control.
As the warming melts polar icecaps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet, enough to cover the Maldives and other flat island nations, Brown told The Associated Press in an interview on Wednesday.
Coastal regions will be inundated; one-sixth of Bangladesh could be flooded, displacing a fourth of its 90 million people. A fifth of Egypt’s arable land in the Nile Delta would be flooded, cutting off its food supply, according to a joint UNEP and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study.
″Ecological refugees will become a major concern, and what’s worse is you may find that people can move to drier ground, but the soils and the natural resources may not support life. Africa doesn’t have to worry about land, but would you want to live in the Sahara?″ he said.
UNEP estimates it would cost the United States at least $100 billion to protect its east coast alone.
Shifting climate patterns would bring back 1930s Dust Bowl conditions to Canadian and U.S. wheatlands, while the Soviet Union could reap bumper crops if it adapts its agriculture in time, according to a study by UNEP and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Excess carbon dioxide is pouring into the atmosphere because of humanity’s use of fossil fuels and burning of rain forests, the study says. The atmosphere is retaining more heat than it radiates, much like a greenhouse.
The most conservative scientific estimate that the Earth’s temperature will rise 1 to 7 degrees in the next 30 years, said Brown.

The difference may seem slight, he said, but the planet is only 9 degrees warmer now than during the 8,000-year Ice Age that ended 10,000 years ago.
Brown said if the warming trend continues, ″the question is will we be able to reverse the process in time? We say that within the next 10 years, given the present loads that the atmosphere has to bear, we have an opportunity to start the stabilizing process.″
He said even the most conservative scientists ″already tell us there’s nothing we can do now to stop a ... change″ of about 3 degrees.

″Anything beyond that, and we have to start thinking about the significant rise of the sea levels ... we can expect more ferocious storms, hurricanes, wind shear, dust erosion.″

He said there is time to act, but there is no time to waste.
Nations will be asked to reduce the use of fossil fuels, cut the emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases such as methane and fluorocarbons, and preserve the rain forests.
″We have no clear idea about the ecological minimum of green space that the planet needs to function effectively. What we do know is that we are destroying the tropical rain forest at the rate of 50 acres a minute, about one football field per second,″ said Brown.

Each acre of rain forest can store 100 tons of carbon dioxide and reprocess it into oxygen.
Brown suggested that compensating Brazil, Indonesia and Kenya for preserving rain forests may be necessary.
The European Community istalking about a half-cent levy on each kilowatt- hour of fossil fuels to raise $55 million a year to protect the rain forests, and other direct subsidies may be possible, he said.
The treaty could also call for improved energy efficiency, increasing conservation, and for developed nations to transfer technology to Third World nations to help them save energy and cut greenhouse gas emissions, said Brown.
AP NEWS

 

Now that I've got you warming alarmist reeled in, I must reveal a couple minor details in the article that I had omitted LOL:

Related topics
Archive

U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked

PETER JAMES SPIELMANN June 30, 1989

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0

[Gorka]

[calfoxwc]

21 minutes ago, Gorka said:

Excess carbon dioxide is pouring into the atmosphere because of humanity’s use of fossil fuels and burning of rain forests, the study says

oh, Woody.... there it is. In a study. Except it isn't just burning - it's harvesting trees for profit.

Millions of acres of rain forest = gone like yesterday.

btw, the excess of co2 is true - but the global warming isn't following the increasing rate of CO2.

[calfoxwc]

25 minutes ago, Gorka said:

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0

alas, poor sheppie - al gore was mankind's savior, he sent a shiver up shep's leg. Entire nations wiped off the earth by flooded sea levels ...by the year 2000.

The UN wants their redistribution of wealth.

[Canton Dawg]

 

 

[Gorka]

Yes

2 hours ago, Canton Dawg said:

 

 

Yes exactly Canton!

You must have missed my punchline at the end of that report.....

Now that I've got you warming alarmist reeled in, I must reveal a couple minor details in the article that I had omitted LOL:

Related topics
Archive

U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked

PETER JAMES SPIELMANN June 30, 1989

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0

[tiamat63]

Between vambo and Gorka...  Wonder whose alts they are. 

 

[Canton Dawg]

5 minutes ago, tiamat63 said:

Between vambo and Gorka...  Wonder whose alts they are. 

 

Woody & Cleve’s sensible sides.

[tiamat63]

2 minutes ago, Canton Dawg said:

Woody & Cleve’s sensible sides.

Original

[Clevfan4life]

12 minutes ago, tiamat63 said:

Between vambo and Gorka...  Wonder whose alts they are. 

 

U know who it is. Its so laughable he has to bring in alts ontop of his already prodigious post count here. Dude literally has nothing to do in his old age

[tiamat63]

5 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said:

U know who it is. Its so laughable he has to bring in alts ontop of his already prodigious post count here. Dude literally has nothing to do in his old age

 

Don't think so.  The punctuation and sentence structure is too different.   

[Gorka]

28 minutes ago, tiamat63 said:

Between vambo and Gorka...  Wonder whose alts they are. 

 

Ah yes you libs...when you've got nothing take a shot at the messenger.

[tiamat63]

9 minutes ago, Gorka said:

Ah yes you libs...when you've got nothing take a shot at the messenger.

Hardly a 'shot'...  But googling Republican/GOP forums or really any type of political board to sound off on and TBB isn't even in the top 100 hits.  Let alone with posting habits and language strangely similar to other members. 

So either someone invites people in or they're already here 🤔

 

And for a man or woman that labels their interests as Brown's football,  you're curiously absent over there.  

 

P. S.  Registered as independent and at one point at the dawn of the 2016 election considered registering as Republican for primaries.  

So you're already off to an inaccurate start. 

[calfoxwc]

1 hour ago, Gorka said:

Ah yes you libs...when you've got nothing take a shot at the messenger.

and if that does work, they go berserk bashing every single source on the internet, that dares to

talk about doofaquack socialist corruption.

[MLD Woody]

1 hour ago, calfoxwc said:

and if that does work, they go berserk bashing every single source on the internet, that dares to

talk about doofaquack socialist corruption.

"Every single source"

Because FreedomAmmoEaglePatriot.net is a totally unbiased and legitimate source

[calfoxwc]

4 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

"Every single source"

Because FreedomAmmoEaglePatriot.net is a totally unbiased and legitimate source

well, your cnn and msnbc won't carry the true stories about what is going on, so...have a nice smartass day, woodpecker.

[MLD Woody]

9 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

well, your cnn and msnbc won't carry the true stories about what is going on, so...have a nice smartass day, woodpecker.

When have I ever posted a story from cnn or msnbc?

 

And you meant to say they won't carry the stories that say what you like to hear

[calfoxwc]

16 hours ago, tiamat63 said:

Hardly a 'shot'...  But googling Republican/GOP forums or really any type of political board to sound off on and TBB isn't even in the top 100 hits.  Let alone with posting habits and language strangely similar to other members. 

So either someone invites people in or they're already here 🤔

And for a man or woman that labels their interests as Brown's football,  you're curiously absent over there. 

P. S.  Registered as independent and at one point at the dawn of the 2016 election considered registering as Republican for primaries.  

So you're already off to an inaccurate start. 

well, I'm over there a lot, but I don't post much because every time I go to post news about the Browns, it's already been posted. 

you should worry about your political field vision. lol

 

[calfoxwc]

38 minutes ago, MLD Woody said:

When have I ever posted a story from cnn or msnbc?

And you meant to say they won't carry the stories that say what you like to hear

you rarely post anything, except ignorant personal insults. Go look at the thread about the 13 yr old special needs girl who was beheaded by some men, ONE OF THEM AN ILLEGAL.

  What you mean to say is, you don't care, you want their free stuff democratic socialist paty illegal VOTE.

[calfoxwc]

getting back to the actual subject of the thread:

U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed.
Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ″eco- refugees,′ ′ threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP.
He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control.
As the warming melts polar icecaps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet, enough to cover the Maldives and other flat island nations, Brown told The Associated Press in an interview on Wednesday.
Coastal regions will be inundated; one-sixth of Bangladesh could be flooded, displacing a fourth of its 90 million people. A fifth of Egypt’s arable land in the Nile Delta would be flooded, cutting off its food supply, according to a joint UNEP and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study.
″Ecological refugees will become a major concern, and what’s worse is you may find that people can move to drier ground, but the soils and the natural resources may not support life. Africa doesn’t have to worry about land, but would you want to live in the Sahara?″ he said.
UNEP estimates it would cost the United States at least $100 billion to protect its east coast alone.
Shifting climate patterns would bring back 1930s Dust Bowl conditions to Canadian and U.S. wheatlands, while the Soviet Union could reap bumper crops if it adapts its agriculture in time, according to a study by UNEP and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Excess carbon dioxide is pouring into the atmosphere because of humanity’s use of fossil fuels and burning of rain forests, the study says. The atmosphere is retaining more heat than it radiates, much like a greenhouse.
The most conservative scientific estimate that the Earth’s temperature will rise 1 to 7 degrees in the next 30 years, said Brown.

The difference may seem slight, he said, but the planet is only 9 degrees warmer now than during the 8,000-year Ice Age that ended 10,000 years ago.
Brown said if the warming trend continues, ″the question is will we be able to reverse the process in time? We say that within the next 10 years, given the present loads that the atmosphere has to bear, we have an opportunity to start the stabilizing process.″
He said even the most conservative scientists ″already tell us there’s nothing we can do now to stop a ... change″ of about 3 degrees.

″Anything beyond that, and we have to start thinking about the significant rise of the sea levels ... we can expect more ferocious storms, hurricanes, wind shear, dust erosion.″

He said there is time to act, but there is no time to waste.
Nations will be asked to reduce the use of fossil fuels, cut the emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases such as methane and fluorocarbons, and preserve the rain forests.
″We have no clear idea about the ecological minimum of green space that the planet needs to function effectively. What we do know is that we are destroying the tropical rain forest at the rate of 50 acres a minute, about one football field per second,″ said Brown.

Each acre of rain forest can store 100 tons of carbon dioxide and reprocess it into oxygen.
Brown suggested that compensating Brazil, Indonesia and Kenya for preserving rain forests may be necessary.
The European Community istalking about a half-cent levy on each kilowatt- hour of fossil fuels to raise $55 million a year to protect the rain forests, and other direct subsidies may be possible, he said.
The treaty could also call for improved energy efficiency, increasing conservation, and for developed nations to transfer technology to Third World nations to help them save energy and cut greenhouse gas emissions, said Brown.
AP NEWS

 

Now that I've got you warming alarmist reeled in, I must reveal a couple minor details in the article that I had omitted LOL:

Related topics
Archive

U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked

PETER JAMES SPIELMANN June 30, 1989

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0

[Gorka]

15 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

"Every single source"

Because FreedomAmmoEaglePatriot.net is a totally unbiased and legitimate source

The truth has no bias.

You can either refute or agree with the points made, but to look the other way and just go with "its biased"  is kinda like a cop out.

Cal puts in a lot of hard work into his research.

[Westside Steve]

10 minutes ago, Gorka said:

The truth has no bias.

You can either refute or agree with the points made, but to look the other way and just go with "its biased"  is kinda like a cop out.

Cal puts in a lot of hard work into his research.

That's true. Just because Rachel Maddow says something doesn't mean it's completely false, it just means that she is dedicated to reporting from the hard left. Same thing with the blaze or any of these other right-wing websites. Doesn't mean the story is false, just means they will report from their angle of choice. Just be careful when you read the headline. 😏

WSS

[MLD Woody]

1 hour ago, Gorka said:

The truth has no bias.

You can either refute or agree with the points made, but to look the other way and just go with "its biased"  is kinda like a cop out.

Cal puts in a lot of hard work into his research.

Hahahahahahahaha

 

Hahahahahahahaha

 

Hahahahahahahahahaha

 

 

 

 

...

 

 

 

 

 

Bahahahahahahahaha

[Westside Steve]

3 minutes ago, MLD Woody said:

Hahahahahahahaha

 

Hahahahahahahaha

 

Hahahahahahahahahaha

 

 

 

 

...

 

 

 

 

 

Bahahahahahahahaha

Any source Woody doesn't like is biased. 

He doesn't care if the story is true or not.

And he's smart enough to realize the limitations of what we could do even if the farthest left claims are true. He just gets mad if everybody doesn't commiserate with him.

WSS

[calfoxwc]

I read - a LOT. I listen to the news - local, and only Fox News. I gave up cnn, etc, because subjects I wanted to hear about, were always ignored if it wasn't pro-smart ass liberal. Or, the spins were subjective so much, it's like texsag or woodpecker stoned on msnbc trying to hate Pres Trump more for no good reason as usual

   Woody's act has gotten so old over the years. He? still doesn't talk anything thoughtful or intelligent on any issue.

The woodpecker just pecks.

[JAFBF]

Reckin this is the latest on this topic, have a bunch of Graphs posted long ago in this thread here :

 

 

 

Newest update :

 

 

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/nasa-declares-carbon-dioxide-is-greening-the-earth-reveals-how-green-new-death-is-a-death-cult-that-would-collapse-global-ecology/

 

Saw an article somewhere else in the past few weeks where Antarctica Ice is growing at an "alarming" rate.

 

Sun is the ultimate determining factor in the Earths Climate.

Man is has a trivial impact on this, and compared to (long time frame) history we're actually cooler than the norm at present.

 

 

[Westside Steve]

I'm kind of disappointed that Tia has decided to take a ride in the Clevis and Butthead clown car. 

Okay Tia you're an intelligent man. You've read some of Gorkas posts I'm sure as well as plenty of Cals. Does it seem even vaguely similar style wise except for a conservative point of view? Seriously? I don't think there are many guys here who could keep a second distinct character and not go off book.

WSS

[calfoxwc]

honestly, I post too much here to try to make an ALT. What would be the point?

It's pretty foolish to think that more than one sensible honest conservative type person on the forum, who doesn't drink

the pinko kool-aid, must be an alt.

seriously.

[Clevfan4life]

On ‎3‎/‎7‎/‎2019 at 1:04 PM, calfoxwc said:

I read - a LOT. I listen to the news - local, and only Fox News. 

[Canton Dawg]

Historically, there’s no direct correlation between temperatures and CO2.