Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

What if the Uighurs were Christian rather than Muslim?


Guest mz.

Recommended Posts

According to The New York Times this morning, violent clashes between Chinese government forces and Muslim Uighurs -- that country's long-oppressed minority -- have left at least 140 people dead and close to 1,000 injured. This incident in Western China highlights an important fact about America's "War on Terror."

 

Just imagine if the Uighurs were a Christian -- rather than Muslim -- minority, battling against the tyrannical Communist regime in Beijing, resisting various types of persecution, and demanding religious freedom. They would be lionized by America's Right, as similar Christian minorities, oppressed by tyrannical regimes, automatically are. Episodes like these -- where a declared Tyranny like China violently acts against citizens with whom we empathize -- are ones about which, in general, the American political class loves to sermonize.

 

But the Uighurs are Muslim, not Christian, and hostility towards them thus easily outweighs the opportunity they present to undermine the Chinese Government. Rather than support and venerate them, we instead spent this decade declaring them to be "enemy combatants" and locking them up in Guantanamo -- despite the fact that they have never evinced any interest in doing anything other than resisting Chinese persecution, and have certainly never taken actions against the U.S. (as even the Bush administration ultimately admitted). Yet even now, both Congress and the administration actively block release into the U.S. even of those Uighurs we wrongfully imprisoned for years, while the Right screams with outrage -- and fear -- over the administration's commendable efforts to find a home for them elsewhere.

 

For all the Serious analysis about the War on Terror, so much of it has been driven by nothing more complex or noble than sheer hostility towards Muslims. Muslims generally -- not just Al Qaeda -- replaced Communists as our New Enemy and became the new enabling force for our endless state of War and never-ending expansions of executive power. Rather obviously, the Uighurs were swept into the Enemy category solely by virtue of their status as Muslims. What more compelling evidence of that could be imagined than the fact that we imprisoned -- and continue to imprison -- people at Guantanamo whose only political interest is in resisting oppression by the Chinese government?

 

From Glenn Greenwald, via here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive me for trying to post an interesting article/take on something of major import happening in the world today.

 

Let's talk about ice cream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After all the liberal whiney-whiney, back door dissing of Bush and our troops in Afghanistan,

 

what the hell were they DOING in Afghanistan and Pakistan?

 

Never a bad word about terrorists.

 

Just cherry picking to try to find some kind of Bush injustice.

 

Really dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all China is a communist government and they dont like it when religion comes into play, so keep buying the chinese shit at Wal Mart and keep pumping cash into the chinese army.

 

Those dirty little Muslim Uighurs live on some of the richest oil fields. Read it here!

 

'Climate of fear'

 

Severe repression since the launch of a "Strike Hard" campaign in 1996 has included harsher controls on religious activity, restrictions on movement and the denial of passports and the detention of individuals suspected of support for separatists and members of their families.

 

This has created a climate of fear and a great deal of resentment towards the authorities and the Han Chinese.

 

It is surprising that this resentment has not erupted into public anger and demonstrations before now, but that is a measure of the tightness of control that Beijing has been able to exercise over Xinjiang.

 

There are a number of emigre Uighur organisations in Europe and the United States; in most cases they advocate genuine autonomy for the region.

 

In the past Beijing has also blamed an Eastern Turkestan Islamic Movement for causing unrest, although there is no evidence that this ever existed in Xinjiang.

 

The authorities in Beijing are unable to accept that their own policies in Xinjiang might be the cause of the conflict, and seek to blame outsiders for inciting the violence - as they do in the case of the Dalai Lama and Tibet.

 

Even if Uighur emigre organisations wished to provoke unrest, it would be difficult for them to do so, and there are, in any case, sufficient local reasons for unrest without the need for external intervention.

 

Michael Dillon is the former director of the Centre for Contemporary Chinese Studies at the University of Durham. He is also the author of a book entitled Xinjiang: China's Muslim Far Northwest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that differs from the DNC how?

WSS

 

Is this really what you've lowered youself to, Steve? McCarthy thinks you throw these words around recklessly and ignorantly...

 

Ever notice who the biggest complainers are around here? They're the "older" dudes who simply cannot and will not embrace progress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a valid criticism -- of many -- to say that the "war on terror" went quickly off course after 9/11 when anti-Muslim paranoia replaced cold objectivity in the decision-making of the Bush administration, and therefore the country.

 

It's also a fair to point out that the Clinton administration supported Muslims in Bosnian and Kosovo, though perhaps the biggest difference between the Clinton policies and the Bush policies was that the people Clinton helped were not Arabs. Ethnically, Bosniaks and Albanians are Caucasian.

 

So maybe the real issue here is not religion but ethnicity? Should we be saying the Bush administration has an ethnic bias?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mz the pussy - they came to AFGHANISTAN AND PAKISTAN for RELIGIOUS FREEDOM???????????????????????????????

 

ROF,LMAO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

You paint such a gloomy and warped picture when you post.

 

"Gee, I think I'll go to PAKISTAN and AFGHANISTAN so I can

 

be free to practice my religion".........

 

ROF,LMAO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

So, WHAT THE HELL WERE THEY D-O-I-N-G in those countries?

 

Gosh, maybe they were trying to convince al quaeda to drop their arms and

 

turn the other cheek?

 

Maybe just teaching al quaeda to play Monopoly?

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this really what you've lowered youself to, Steve? McCarthy thinks you throw these words around recklessly and ignorantly...

 

Ever notice who the biggest complainers are around here? They're the "older" dudes who simply cannot and will not embrace progress.

 

First of all China is a communist government and they dont like it when religion comes into play,

 

OK.

So it differs from you how?

 

Besides the usual lashing out tell me how you like it when "religion comes into play."

 

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that differs from the DNC how?

WSS

 

 

They are equal =

 

look at this group of badass motherF;kers,

 

here are the faces of the democrat elite!

hillary_zombie.jpg

ted-kennedy-sailor.jpg

Where is the man bra teddy?

harry-reid-finger.jpg

nobama1.jpg

obamunistwj1.gif

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all China is a communist government and they dont like it when religion comes into play,

 

OK.

So it differs from you how?

 

Besides the usual lashing out tell me how you like it when "religion comes into play."

 

WSS

 

I think you're replying to me and someone else at once.

 

But how do I differ from a Communist government? Is that what you're asking?

 

Well, first off, I'm not a Communist government, or a Communist. And I don't mind religion until it makes its way into politics and into people trying to influence the way I live my life, through religion via politics. You're allowed to believe in whatever you want to believe in, but afford me the same respect.

 

They are equal =

 

look at this group of badass motherF;kers,

 

You're acting like a child. The next time you're interested in engaging in something serious, PM me and we'll chat. I'm serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're replying to a post Inspecta made, not me, you fcuking moron.

**************************************************

Well, shithead, I have you know who on ignore, and YOU posted the original post,

 

and have NOT answered the question, as usual.

 

Besides, there is little difference. Almost none.

 

So, you disagree - the Uighurs did NOT flee to avoid religious persecution?

 

Don't be so stupid - your own link talks about how they fired an AK-47 some.

 

Maybe at American soldiers? THEN they got caught?

 

Yeah, THAT kind of "peaceloving, fleeing religious persecution boo hoo a hippo's rear end"

 

You are SO naive when it comes to worhipping the progressive idol.

 

Let the rest of us know when you want to stop being an arrogant, dimwitted smart ass and

 

want to talk seriously about subjects. You know, how you all lamented and whined about?

 

Let it be known, that YOU ended the truce. Seriously.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moron was actually a real, clinically-used term back in the day. Meaning it actually described a range of IQ scores. As did imbecile (lower score range than moron) and idiot (lower score range than imbecile, and lowest of them all IIRC). So, in retrospect I wasn't as disrespectful as you might have thought.

 

Well, the f-word in front of the formerly-used clinical term does probably penalize the recipient of the score a point or two..........mere peanuts.

 

Truces are solidified over time, and every cease fire has a flame-up once in awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're replying to me and someone else at once.

 

I didn't adress you at all initially.

I responded to a statement and you spewed off some Mccarthy stuff.

 

But how do I differ from a Communist government? Is that what you're asking?

 

No. Is that what I said?

 

Well, first off, I'm not a Communist government, or a Communist.

 

Good for you. So what? I made the point that the Chicoms do NOT like religion and neither do tghe DNC.

I'll amend that to "only if it serves their desire for power."

And yo udon't seem to mind if it effects our lives if it's a leftist change.

 

Didn't think it was that opaque.

;)

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if we can assume all muslims are terrosists, then we can equally assume all christians are terrorists as well. they also go around killing people for disagreeing with their beliefs.

 

 

some intolerant mo'fo's around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awww isn't that cute. Cal got tired of me choke slamming/drop kicking him in the nuts at every turn and exposing his bullshit left and right, so he had to take the cowards way out and turn tail and hide.

 

What a f*cking pussy.

 

Somebody quote me...

 

I'm guessing he doesn't have you on ignore anyway...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awww isn't that cute. Cal got tired of me choke slamming/drop kicking him in the nuts at every turn and exposing his bullshit left and right, so he had to take the cowards way out and turn tail and hide.

 

What a f*cking pussy.

 

Somebody quote me...

 

Yep a pussy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the Uighurs were engaged in battle against our troops when they were takin prisoner.

 

 

Go figure, they are now prisoners of war.

 

 

And now you want them freed. wtf

 

 

Ha. You really think they had to be engaging our troops to have been picked up? Really? It's as if you haven't been seeing what's been gong on there for 6 years...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moron was actually a real, clinically-used term back in the day. Meaning it actually described a range of IQ scores. As did imbecile (lower score range than moron) and idiot (lower score range than imbecile, and lowest of them all IIRC). So, in retrospect I wasn't as disrespectful as you might have thought.

 

Well, the f-word in front of the formerly-used clinical term does probably penalize the recipient of the score a point or two..........mere peanuts.

 

Truces are solidified over time, and every cease fire has a flame-up once in awhile.

********************************************

 

 

Okay. I still think you're full of baloney, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did you read that?

 

Rush wouldn't even have the sack to claim that. He didn't read it anywhere because it isn't true. They were deemed so harmless the Bush Administration decided to let them go...and they didn't do that too often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest Aloysius

Here's a good article on the Uighurs:

 

Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

The Uighurs aren't extremists--but the Chinese government may change that.

 

The Uighurs, like the Turks with whom they share ethnic and linguistic roots, embrace a blending of devotion and modernity. While Islam is a central aspect of their identity, Uighurs don't view the world, or their relationship to Beijing, as an ecclesiastical clash of civilizations. They have plenty of complaints about Chinese government policy, but those grievances aren't formulated or expressed in the name of Allah. Nor do Uighur clerics enforce a culturally conservative outlook. Women in Kashgar wear headscarves, but they also zip themselves about town on motorbikes.

 

[...]

 

But at the same time, many analysts believe that further restricting religious observance--a troubling likelihood today, as Chinese authorities look for scapegoats in the wake of the riots--could encourage radicalism. A recent Human Rights Watch report makes a detailed and alarming case that China's "overbroad and repressive policies in Xinjiang deepen local resentment and risk further destabilizing the region." Or, as Andrew Nathan, chair of the political science department at Columbia University, puts it: "It's a real dilemma for the Chinese regime: They have long been committed to this regulatory repressive track, but it produces resentment. It produces resistance."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...