Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

he didn't want the story below to come out?


Mr. T

Recommended Posts

Is Henry Gates a crook who had good reason to fear the police?

 

Just an excerpt from a much bigger story below

 

Henry Louis Gates, Jr controls a tax-exempt, non-profit charity, Inkwell Foundation, Inc, that managed to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars in direct support in one year, yet only gave out $27,500 in grants, the bulk of which went to Gates' employees and Harvard colleagues. Also, as recently as September 2008, the Boston Globe reported that Gates' charity was not in compliance with the law for failing to register the proper paperwork, despite the charity existing since 2005. The charge at the time was that it was "bogus," as you'll see below. In fact, the state Attorney General's office told the Globe the charity was likely either inactive, or dissolved. Yet, documents below show the charity is healthy, wealthy and active.

 

Is it possible that Henry Louis Gates, Jr. was acting strange when law enforcement showed up at his door because he didn't want the story below to come out? It may take a tax lawyer to answer that question, but based on this research, it can't be ruled out. We know the press has questioned Gates about the charity in the past and gotten no response.

 

Acting on a tip and with an item at Instapundit in mind (much more at this link), I was curious when Joseph Culligan of Web of Deception emailed with a tip as to the home's ownership. It seems Harvard does own the home in which Gates lives. But it's also the address for his charity, see below.

 

Third, Harvard sent someone from the University maintenance department over to secure Gates’ house and/or fix the broken lock on his front door. How many people have an employer who’ll send maintenance staff over to fix up or watch over their house?

 

Scroll all the way to the bottom at this link for the actual documents, including the real estate information. Gates uses Harvard (12 Quincy St.) as his home address on the charity paperwork, as opposed to the same one as his charity, which is where he actually lives and was at when the recent police incident took place. It would seem to be incorrect. A wiki has this Inkwell below as it's center item and reports that a Globe reporter has accused it of being a "bogus" charity.

 

read BUSTED!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're refusing to address the content again.

 

Here - in Gates' own words -

 

I believe Gates' went overboard to create the arrest and make a sensation racial "confrontation" for himself.

 

he's black vs white, and called Justice Clarence Thomas a "hypocrite",

 

obviously referring to his opinions about affirmative action.

 

And, Gates openly refers to "shaking the tree".

 

I wonder what he meant by that... maybe... he "shook the tree" when they openly and apparently, loudly, broke into his home?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems Harvard does own the home in which Gates lives. But it's also the address for his charity, see below.

 

Third, Harvard sent someone from the University maintenance department over to secure Gates’ house and/or fix the broken lock on his front door. How many people have an employer who’ll send maintenance staff over to fix up or watch over their house?

 

Umm, maybe I'm missing something, but if Harvard does indeed own the house, then it is positively normal for their maintenance staff to fix the property if something breaks.

 

What's the hub-bub?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're refusing to address the content again.

 

Here - in Gates' own words -

 

I believe Gates' went overboard to create the arrest and make a sensation racial "confrontation" for himself.

 

he's black vs white, and called Justice Clarence Thomas a "hypocrite",

 

obviously referring to his opinions about affirmative action.

 

And, Gates openly refers to "shaking the tree".

 

I wonder what he meant by that... maybe... he "shook the tree" when they openly and apparently, loudly, broke into his home?

 

I addressed the content rather precisely, cal. I read it and dismissed it as a smear piece filled with fallacies and incorrect assumptions, just as everyone else has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...