Greythan Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 So, I'm sure I'm late to the logic game here, but this came to me today. The forum owner is Stan. So, if he and so many mods/former mods/influential posters really HATE the anti-DA stuff here why would he/they actually continue to let Lum spew his obviously inflamatory posts on these boards? It is clear to even the newest poster that Lum's posts only serve to WORSTEN the quality of the QB debate. Why, instead, wouldn't they warn him (leading to banning if he doesn't listen) and do the DA defending themselves? They could, in a similar fashion, warn posters they find similiarly inflamatory "against DA/for Quinn". Most of the posters on this board, while opinonated, certainly have the Browns success at the core. Take me for example. My opinion is that further investment in DA has a lower probability for success than seeing what we have with Quinn. If Quinn fails or can't beat out DA at all, then my opinion is our championship caliber QB isn't on the current roster. All that said, I'm going to cheer for whomever wins the job because I'm a Browns fan. Why allow Lum's obvious agenda to incite-only (which CLEARLY leads to responses that irritate Stan, et al) to continue when you could do the defending yourselves and most likely bring better balance back to the forum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.