Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Some more indictments for confirmed rapist.


cccjwh

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, cccjwh said:

You have any defense of your lord and savior or you just going to cry some more?

 

He's more than capable of defending himself... Unlike your Hero Biden who shits himself...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, cccjwh said:

You have any defense of your lord and savior or you just going to cry some more?

 

remember 2016?  

we all know that the tactics of what the left does to quiet voices include defamation, mocking and shaming 

 and of course, there's you.

this can even work for the so called indictment coming from Georgia

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/3/2023 at 5:44 AM, FairHooker11 said:

remember 2016?  

we all know that the tactics of what the left does to quiet voices include defamation, mocking and shaming 

 and of course, there's you.

this can even work for the so called indictment coming from Georgia

   

Been 7 years since your last win and you are bragging about it. 😆

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Jax said:

How exactly do you come to that conclusion?

So you must think he broke the law, tell me exactly which laws.

 

Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States)
Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding)
Count 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2), 2 (Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding)
Count 4: 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights)

Case No. 23-CR-80101-CANNON{s)
18 U.S.C. § 793{e)
18 U.S.C. § 1512(k)
18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(2)(A)
18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(2)(B)
18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(1)
18 u.s.c. § 1519
18 U.S.C. § 100l(a)(1)
18 U.S.C. § 100l(a)(2)
18 u.s.c. § 2

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST 
DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10
 

You know they list the laws the moron broke in the indictments, right?

_indictment 4 4 2022 (manhattanda.org)

Superseding indictment, United States v. Trump, Nauta, and De Oliveira, July 27, 2023 (justice.gov)

United States v. Donald J. Trump (justice.gov)

 

GA incoming... probably. R I C O

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, cccjwh said:

 

Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States)
Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding)
Count 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2), 2 (Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding)
Count 4: 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights)

Case No. 23-CR-80101-CANNON{s)
18 U.S.C. § 793{e)
18 U.S.C. § 1512(k)
18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(2)(A)
18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(2)(B)
18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(1)
18 u.s.c. § 1519
18 U.S.C. § 100l(a)(1)
18 U.S.C. § 100l(a)(2)
18 u.s.c. § 2

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST 
DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10
 

You know they list the laws the moron broke in the indictments, right?

_indictment 4 4 2022 (manhattanda.org)

Superseding indictment, United States v. Trump, Nauta, and De Oliveira, July 27, 2023 (justice.gov)

United States v. Donald J. Trump (justice.gov)

 

GA incoming... probably. R I C O

 

 

All phony made up crimes... Try harder Jr...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jax said:

But, he didn't actually do any of those things.

If you think he did, please explain.

Are you saying he didn't try to stop the vote count?

Are you saying he didn't organize fake electors?

Are you saying he didn't try to get "his" electors counted instead of the real ones?

Are you saying he didn't conspire with other people to do any of these things?

Any single thing listed above is breaking the law.

Grand jury indicted him, and a criminal jury is the one that will determine if he is guilty. Just like a jury ruled he is rapist.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, cccjwh said:

Are you saying he didn't try to stop the vote count?

Are you saying he didn't organize fake electors?

Are you saying he didn't try to get "his" electors counted instead of the real ones?

Are you saying he didn't conspire with other people to do any of these things?

Any single thing listed above is breaking the law.

Grand jury indicted him, and a criminal jury is the one that will determine if he is guilty. Just like a jury ruled he is rapist.

 

cherokee tampons informing GIF by South Park

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cccjwh said:

Bahahhahaha. Your feelings don't make the laws disappear. 😄

My feelings aren't the issue here... But like Woody... Your commitment to stupidity is alarming...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jax said:

But, he didn't actually do any of those things.

If you think he did, please explain.

So you join the Browns Board and come straight here? Do you even post in the football forum? So which other ailias is yours I'm wondering?🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jax said:

Nor do your feelings make him guilty.

He's not guilty yet but they don't just going around arresting people for no reason. Apparently they think they have enough to convince a jury he's guilty. That's how things work in this country.

 

6 hours ago, Jax said:

How exactly do you come to that conclusion?

So you must think he broke the law, tell me exactly which laws.

So you want proof that he actually broken laws but when people ask for proof of Trump's election fraud claims they convieniently don't need proof. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...