Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Ponder this...


shepwrite

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Violets are blue, and roses are red

 

Can we all "Rodney King it"

 

and put this QB shit to bed?

 

 

Ponder this...I hate the Broncos nearly as much as I hate the Steelers. Can the BROWNS beat their asses already (5-20 all time)?

 

 

No...we almost never beat Denver..I expect we won't on Sunday as well.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't give a crap as a fan if he makes the 70% mark or not. Maybe it will knock some common sense into the organization and stop sitting 1rd picks on the bench for years while a sixth rounder blows chunks.

 

smartest thing ive read al day, we handled BQ terribly, he should have started his rookie season, even though he was late to camp, he scored more than Frye and DA then. Plus he had all the confidence in the world

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's say it's the same situation: Quinn gets, what? 24 more starts?

 

Fair enough.

 

No, shep, it's not okay. He's too good looking. He might have me questioning my sexuality after 24 starts. No, shep, we need to nip this plague in the bud lest we revert to the evils of Sodom and Gomorrah.

 

But if he does continue starting, I can at least call his supporters gay. That makes me straight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say for starters the situation is not the same (different schedule, different roster, different coaching staff, etc.).

 

Different in that the schedule is harder, the roster is not as good, the coaching staff is not capable enough? .... why can't Quinn do what Anderson did in 07?

 

Zombo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Different in that the schedule is harder, the roster is not as good, the coaching staff is not capable enough? .... why can't Quinn do what Anderson did in 07?

 

Zombo

Because Mangini is a more balanced, run oriented, methodical, "it's a process" type coach. He is not asking his QB to toss it up as much. Different offense, different TE, different players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is not asking his QB to toss it up as much.

 

he's an "it's a process" coach? And that means......?

 

The coach is methodical? As opposed to......?

 

The offense is run oriented and at the same time is balanced?

 

Nice analysis dipshit.

 

BTW Quinn threw it 35 times on Sunday. There were 20 runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's an "it's a process" coach?

 

The offense is run oriented and at the same time is balanced?

 

Nice analysis dipshit.

 

BTW Quinn threw it 35 times on Sunday.

21 of those were in the 4th Q....dipshit.

 

He had only 11 passes in the first half, and 14 by the end of the 3rd...that is balanced...but leaning towards the run....dipshit.

 

Oh well...there I go feeding the animals again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Different in that the schedule is harder, the roster is not as good, the coaching staff is not capable enough? .... why can't Quinn do what Anderson did in 07?

 

Zombo

 

Different schedule (on paper it is harder than the 2007 schedule, but really won't know until the games are played).

 

I would say the offensive weapons are not as good this year (2yr older Lewis, no Winslow, an no JJ). But again, that's just on paper today.

 

This coaching staff has a different offensive philosophy than the previous (ball/clock control offense vs. a spread score quick offense).

 

Quinn doesn't have the arm DA has to surprise teams the first time they see him w/ little film to go off of.

 

Asking why X player can't do what Y player did is always a slippery slope. Every season and every circumstance is different. There is a reason for the saying of "on any given Sunday"....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah I'd like to know.

 

did you make it up?

He was 0-3 in 2006, 10-5 in 2007, and 3-7 in 2008.

 

2006

13 12/03 KC W 31-28 1 0 12 21 57.1 171 8.1 2 1 1 5 95.5 2 44 22.0 0 -- -- 1-0

14 12/07 @ PIT L 7-27 1 1 21 37 56.8 276 7.5 1 1 0 0 78.2 1 4 4.0 0 1 1 1-1

15 12/17 @ BAL L 17-27 1 1 23 32 71.9 223 7.0 2 2 5 41 85.8 -- -- -- -- 1 0 1-2

16 12/24 TB L 7-22 1 1 10 27 37.0 123 4.6 0 4 2 20 12.3 1 -1 -1.0 0 -- -- 1-3

 

2007

1 09/09 PIT L 7-34 1 0 13 28 46.4 184 6.6 1 1 1 12 65.2 1 -1 -1.0 0 1 1

2 09/16 CIN W 51-45 1 1 20 33 60.6 328 9.9 5 1 0 0 121.0 1 -1 -1.0 0 1 0

3 09/23 @ OAK L 24-26 1 1 18 37 48.6 248 6.7 1 2 1 24 57.0 2 12 6.0 1 1 0

4 09/30 BAL W 27-13 1 1 10 18 55.6 204 11.3 2 1 0 0 109.5 3 0 0.0 0 -- --

5 10/07 @ NE L 17-34 1 1 22 43 51.2 287 6.7 2 3 3 26 59.0 3 7 2.3 0 -- --

6 10/14 MIA W 41-31 1 1 18 25 72.0 245 9.8 3 0 1 1 142.5 5 13 2.6 1 -- --

7 Bye -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --

8 10/28 @ STL W 27-20 1 1 18 25 72.0 248 9.9 3 0 2 12 143.0 1 -1 -1.0 0 -- --

9 11/04 SEA W 33-30 1 1 29 48 60.4 364 7.6 0 1 0 0 75.3 2 21 10.5 0 -- --

10 11/11 @ PIT L 28-31 1 1 16 35 45.7 123 3.5 3 0 0 0 83.4 2 5 2.5 0 -- --

11 11/18 @ BAL W 33-30 1 1 24 38 63.2 274 7.2 0 1 1 5 73.8 4 -4 -1.0 1 -- --

12 11/25 HOU W 27-17 1 1 24 35 68.6 253 7.2 2 1 1 4 96.5 -- -- -- -- 1 0

13 12/02 @ ARI L 21-27 1 1 21 41 51.2 304 7.4 2 2 1 9 71.6 2 10 5.0 0 1 1

14 12/09 @ NYJ W 24-18 1 1 16 29 55.2 185 6.4 2 1 0 0 83.3 3 3 1.0 0 -- --

15 12/16 BUF W 8-0 1 1 9 24 37.5 137 5.7 0 0 1 7 57.1 1 0 0.0 0 -- --

16 12/23 @ CIN L 14-19 1 1 29 48 60.4 251 5.2 2 4 1 7 53.4 1 6 6.0 0 -- --

17 12/30 SF W 20-7 1 1 11 20 55.0 152 7.6 1 1 1 2 75.4 1 0 0.0 0 -- --

 

 

2008

1 09/07 DAL L 10-28 1 1 11 24 45.8 114 4.8 1 0 1 0 74.0 4 24 6.0 0 2 0

2 09/14 PIT L 6-10 1 1 18 32 56.3 166 5.2 0 2 2 11 44.5 3 6 2.0 0 -- --

3 09/21 @ BAL L 10-28 1 1 14 37 37.8 125 3.4 1 3 4 26 22.9 2 -1 -0.5 0 1 0

4 09/28 @ CIN W 20-12 1 1 15 24 62.5 138 5.8 1 1 1 11 74.7 4 11 2.8 0 1 0

5 Bye -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --

6 10/13 NYG W 35-14 1 1 18 29 62.1 310 10.7 2 0 0 0 121.3 4 -2 -0.5 0 1 0

7 10/19 @ WAS L 11-14 1 1 14 37 37.8 136 3.7 1 0 1 2 57.9 3 4 1.3 0 1 0

8 10/26 @ JAC W 23-17 1 1 14 27 51.9 246 9.1 1 0 1 10 95.6 -- -- -- -- 1 0

9 11/02 BAL L 27-37 1 1 17 33 51.5 219 6.6 2 1 1 9 80.2 2 8 4.0 0 -- --

10 11/06 DEN L 30-34 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --

11 11/17 @ BUF W 29-27 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --

12 11/23 HOU L 6-16 1 0 5 14 35.7 51 3.6 0 1 0 0 17.3 1 0 0.0 0 1 1

13 11/30 IND L 6-10 1 1 16 26 61.5 110 4.2 0 0 3 18 71.0 2 5 2.5 0 1 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was 3-6 in 2008, not 3-7.

Yeah, he was 5-14 for 51 yards, 1INT and 1 FUMBLE, with a 17.3 QBR vs HOU. I wouldn't want to count that game either.

 

NFL.com offically lists his wins and losses for 2008 @ 3-7, so eat a dick.

 

Splits By Wins/Losses G Att Comp Pct Yds Avg Lng TD Int 1st 1st% 20+ Sck SckY Rate

Losses 7 203 95 46.8 921 4.5 28 5 7 53 26.1 7 12 66 53.8

 

Wins 3 80 47 58.8 694 8.7 70 4 1 29 36.2 9 2 21 98.6

 

L I N K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not seen many people call for BQ to benched. Because you attack his poor performance in the last game does not mean you want him benched. At least at this time.

 

I have not seen anybody but lum that says bench BQ now. I have seen several people (me included) that have said that BQ played a really bad game and have just refuted the notion that he played a C game and not a D game. I had said that he played horrible, but it was pointed out that he did not play Cutler horrible so I did change my mind to make my grade a D and not an F.

 

BQ's overall stat line was a D+ or C - (and if you want to know both BQ and DA got a D+ last year from me) but considering how bad it was before the Vikings started playing prevent defense I will stick with my D rating. I said on another post that it was one game, you can not judge anybody on one game. I do want to see if BQ can string together a few games together.

 

It seems to me that if a person says BQ played poorly and calls him dink and dunk (which he did do that one game) that you think they are calling for DA. At this time this is not about DA, because he is not the starter. It is all about BQs performance. And last game he played BAD, he did not help the team in anyway. That does not mean that is who he is, it just means he played a bad game.

 

He is hoping that BQ plays much better this week against Denver. Oh and on a side note if BQ does not play well then is it because of the vastly improved Denver defense? I for one will come in and say BQ had a good game if I think he did. It is on to start number 5 comparison.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because you attack his poor performance in the last game does not mean you want him benched. At least at this time.

 

I have not seen anybody but lum that says bench BQ now.

 

No I don't think he should be benched yet. Let BQ Nation get the Bernie Kosar reminiscing out of their system. (however it may not take too long at the current pace)

 

Then when the real QB of this team comes in, BQ Nation will be over it so they won't boo and chant for their Brady-pie all game long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's for vegas.

 

my request to you was to google the words dink, dunk, and quinn

 

did you do it yet?

And I challenge you to do the same with this

 

dink dunk 'tom brady'

 

you will see that Tom Brady is considered to be a dink n dunk QB by most, but that he is also opportunistic and goes downfield on occasion.

 

just sayin'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, he was 5-14 for 51 yards, 1INT and 1 FUMBLE, with a 17.3 QBR vs HOU. I wouldn't want to count that game either.

 

NFL.com offically lists his wins and losses for 2008 @ 3-7, so eat a dick.

 

 

 

L I N K

DA did not start this game though. He came in at halftime. And I know when I did his stats for last year I included it just like in 2007 I included stats from Pittsburgh but he did not start that game either.

 

BQs stats for that START

 

Brady Quinn CLE 8 18 94 0 2 42 with a rating of 21.3

 

And DA did only start 9 games, he played in 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because Mangini is a more balanced, run oriented, methodical, "it's a process" type coach. He is not asking his QB to toss it up as much. Different offense, different TE, different players.

 

Run oriented? LMAO

 

We ran the ball 20 times and tried to throw it 40 on sunday, that is 33% run.

 

In Anderson's first start in 07, we ran the ball 30 and threw 33. That's balance. (5 passing TDs that day, by the way).

 

The Browns in 07 threw 545 times and rushed 440. 55% pass

 

The Jets in 08 (Dabol and Mangini) threw 529 and rushed 422. 56% pass

 

You have no idea what you are talking about do you?

 

Zombo

--But you are right, we have a different tight end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ATENEARS
and like I pointed out in the other thread, he took 7 shots downfield in game 1....so much for that offering lummy

 

I had no idea he was having that many injections ... I thought he developed normally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...