Zombo Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 I am not looking for Quinn to compete with his 2007 season, because I don't think it is possible. Why not? Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Violets are blue, and roses are red Can we all "Rodney King it" and put this QB shit to bed? Ponder this...I hate the Broncos nearly as much as I hate the Steelers. Can the BROWNS beat their asses already (5-20 all time)? No...we almost never beat Denver..I expect we won't on Sunday as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlaygroundLegend Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 I really don't give a crap as a fan if he makes the 70% mark or not. Maybe it will knock some common sense into the organization and stop sitting 1rd picks on the bench for years while a sixth rounder blows chunks. smartest thing ive read al day, we handled BQ terribly, he should have started his rookie season, even though he was late to camp, he scored more than Frye and DA then. Plus he had all the confidence in the world Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lumbergh Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 You want to know how I came up with 13-15? yeah I'd like to know. did you make it up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grimmreaper3 Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Let's say it's the same situation: Quinn gets, what? 24 more starts? Fair enough. No, shep, it's not okay. He's too good looking. He might have me questioning my sexuality after 24 starts. No, shep, we need to nip this plague in the bud lest we revert to the evils of Sodom and Gomorrah. But if he does continue starting, I can at least call his supporters gay. That makes me straight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Masters Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Why not? Zombo I'd say for starters the situation is not the same (different schedule, different roster, different coaching staff, etc.). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 I'd say for starters the situation is not the same (different schedule, different roster, different coaching staff, etc.). Different in that the schedule is harder, the roster is not as good, the coaching staff is not capable enough? .... why can't Quinn do what Anderson did in 07? Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegasdogg Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Different in that the schedule is harder, the roster is not as good, the coaching staff is not capable enough? .... why can't Quinn do what Anderson did in 07? Zombo Because Mangini is a more balanced, run oriented, methodical, "it's a process" type coach. He is not asking his QB to toss it up as much. Different offense, different TE, different players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lumbergh Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 He is not asking his QB to toss it up as much. he's an "it's a process" coach? And that means......? The coach is methodical? As opposed to......? The offense is run oriented and at the same time is balanced? Nice analysis dipshit. BTW Quinn threw it 35 times on Sunday. There were 20 runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WPB Dawg Fan Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 he's an "it's a process" coach? The offense is run oriented and at the same time is balanced? Nice analysis dipshit. BTW Quinn threw it 35 times on Sunday. 21 of those were in the 4th Q....dipshit. He had only 11 passes in the first half, and 14 by the end of the 3rd...that is balanced...but leaning towards the run....dipshit. Oh well...there I go feeding the animals again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Masters Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Different in that the schedule is harder, the roster is not as good, the coaching staff is not capable enough? .... why can't Quinn do what Anderson did in 07? Zombo Different schedule (on paper it is harder than the 2007 schedule, but really won't know until the games are played). I would say the offensive weapons are not as good this year (2yr older Lewis, no Winslow, an no JJ). But again, that's just on paper today. This coaching staff has a different offensive philosophy than the previous (ball/clock control offense vs. a spread score quick offense). Quinn doesn't have the arm DA has to surprise teams the first time they see him w/ little film to go off of. Asking why X player can't do what Y player did is always a slippery slope. Every season and every circumstance is different. There is a reason for the saying of "on any given Sunday".... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegasdogg Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 yeah I'd like to know. did you make it up? He was 0-3 in 2006, 10-5 in 2007, and 3-7 in 2008. 2006 13 12/03 KC W 31-28 1 0 12 21 57.1 171 8.1 2 1 1 5 95.5 2 44 22.0 0 -- -- 1-0 14 12/07 @ PIT L 7-27 1 1 21 37 56.8 276 7.5 1 1 0 0 78.2 1 4 4.0 0 1 1 1-1 15 12/17 @ BAL L 17-27 1 1 23 32 71.9 223 7.0 2 2 5 41 85.8 -- -- -- -- 1 0 1-2 16 12/24 TB L 7-22 1 1 10 27 37.0 123 4.6 0 4 2 20 12.3 1 -1 -1.0 0 -- -- 1-3 2007 1 09/09 PIT L 7-34 1 0 13 28 46.4 184 6.6 1 1 1 12 65.2 1 -1 -1.0 0 1 1 2 09/16 CIN W 51-45 1 1 20 33 60.6 328 9.9 5 1 0 0 121.0 1 -1 -1.0 0 1 0 3 09/23 @ OAK L 24-26 1 1 18 37 48.6 248 6.7 1 2 1 24 57.0 2 12 6.0 1 1 0 4 09/30 BAL W 27-13 1 1 10 18 55.6 204 11.3 2 1 0 0 109.5 3 0 0.0 0 -- -- 5 10/07 @ NE L 17-34 1 1 22 43 51.2 287 6.7 2 3 3 26 59.0 3 7 2.3 0 -- -- 6 10/14 MIA W 41-31 1 1 18 25 72.0 245 9.8 3 0 1 1 142.5 5 13 2.6 1 -- -- 7 Bye -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 10/28 @ STL W 27-20 1 1 18 25 72.0 248 9.9 3 0 2 12 143.0 1 -1 -1.0 0 -- -- 9 11/04 SEA W 33-30 1 1 29 48 60.4 364 7.6 0 1 0 0 75.3 2 21 10.5 0 -- -- 10 11/11 @ PIT L 28-31 1 1 16 35 45.7 123 3.5 3 0 0 0 83.4 2 5 2.5 0 -- -- 11 11/18 @ BAL W 33-30 1 1 24 38 63.2 274 7.2 0 1 1 5 73.8 4 -4 -1.0 1 -- -- 12 11/25 HOU W 27-17 1 1 24 35 68.6 253 7.2 2 1 1 4 96.5 -- -- -- -- 1 0 13 12/02 @ ARI L 21-27 1 1 21 41 51.2 304 7.4 2 2 1 9 71.6 2 10 5.0 0 1 1 14 12/09 @ NYJ W 24-18 1 1 16 29 55.2 185 6.4 2 1 0 0 83.3 3 3 1.0 0 -- -- 15 12/16 BUF W 8-0 1 1 9 24 37.5 137 5.7 0 0 1 7 57.1 1 0 0.0 0 -- -- 16 12/23 @ CIN L 14-19 1 1 29 48 60.4 251 5.2 2 4 1 7 53.4 1 6 6.0 0 -- -- 17 12/30 SF W 20-7 1 1 11 20 55.0 152 7.6 1 1 1 2 75.4 1 0 0.0 0 -- -- 2008 1 09/07 DAL L 10-28 1 1 11 24 45.8 114 4.8 1 0 1 0 74.0 4 24 6.0 0 2 0 2 09/14 PIT L 6-10 1 1 18 32 56.3 166 5.2 0 2 2 11 44.5 3 6 2.0 0 -- -- 3 09/21 @ BAL L 10-28 1 1 14 37 37.8 125 3.4 1 3 4 26 22.9 2 -1 -0.5 0 1 0 4 09/28 @ CIN W 20-12 1 1 15 24 62.5 138 5.8 1 1 1 11 74.7 4 11 2.8 0 1 0 5 Bye -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- 6 10/13 NYG W 35-14 1 1 18 29 62.1 310 10.7 2 0 0 0 121.3 4 -2 -0.5 0 1 0 7 10/19 @ WAS L 11-14 1 1 14 37 37.8 136 3.7 1 0 1 2 57.9 3 4 1.3 0 1 0 8 10/26 @ JAC W 23-17 1 1 14 27 51.9 246 9.1 1 0 1 10 95.6 -- -- -- -- 1 0 9 11/02 BAL L 27-37 1 1 17 33 51.5 219 6.6 2 1 1 9 80.2 2 8 4.0 0 -- -- 10 11/06 DEN L 30-34 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- 11 11/17 @ BUF W 29-27 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- 12 11/23 HOU L 6-16 1 0 5 14 35.7 51 3.6 0 1 0 0 17.3 1 0 0.0 0 1 1 13 11/30 IND L 6-10 1 1 16 26 61.5 110 4.2 0 0 3 18 71.0 2 5 2.5 0 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lumbergh Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 He was 0-3 in 2006, 10-5 in 2007, and 3-7 in 2008. I see where you F'd it up. He was 3-6 in 2008, not 3-7. now run along son. fetch me my morning coffee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegasdogg Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 He was 3-6 in 2008, not 3-7. Yeah, he was 5-14 for 51 yards, 1INT and 1 FUMBLE, with a 17.3 QBR vs HOU. I wouldn't want to count that game either. NFL.com offically lists his wins and losses for 2008 @ 3-7, so eat a dick. Splits By Wins/Losses G Att Comp Pct Yds Avg Lng TD Int 1st 1st% 20+ Sck SckY Rate Losses 7 203 95 46.8 921 4.5 28 5 7 53 26.1 7 12 66 53.8 Wins 3 80 47 58.8 694 8.7 70 4 1 29 36.2 9 2 21 98.6 L I N K Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lumbergh Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 NFL.com offically lists his wins and losses for 2008 @ 3-7, so eat a dick. yeah NFL.com doesn't do it by starts. They list all career games, and somehow you came up with 28? FYI they also put the KC win in there in 2006 (yet you didn't???) now go fetch me that coffee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmac12 Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 I have not seen many people call for BQ to benched. Because you attack his poor performance in the last game does not mean you want him benched. At least at this time. I have not seen anybody but lum that says bench BQ now. I have seen several people (me included) that have said that BQ played a really bad game and have just refuted the notion that he played a C game and not a D game. I had said that he played horrible, but it was pointed out that he did not play Cutler horrible so I did change my mind to make my grade a D and not an F. BQ's overall stat line was a D+ or C - (and if you want to know both BQ and DA got a D+ last year from me) but considering how bad it was before the Vikings started playing prevent defense I will stick with my D rating. I said on another post that it was one game, you can not judge anybody on one game. I do want to see if BQ can string together a few games together. It seems to me that if a person says BQ played poorly and calls him dink and dunk (which he did do that one game) that you think they are calling for DA. At this time this is not about DA, because he is not the starter. It is all about BQs performance. And last game he played BAD, he did not help the team in anyway. That does not mean that is who he is, it just means he played a bad game. He is hoping that BQ plays much better this week against Denver. Oh and on a side note if BQ does not play well then is it because of the vastly improved Denver defense? I for one will come in and say BQ had a good game if I think he did. It is on to start number 5 comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Masters Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Jesus you've turned into a pathetic individual. Turned into? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lumbergh Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Because you attack his poor performance in the last game does not mean you want him benched. At least at this time. I have not seen anybody but lum that says bench BQ now. No I don't think he should be benched yet. Let BQ Nation get the Bernie Kosar reminiscing out of their system. (however it may not take too long at the current pace) Then when the real QB of this team comes in, BQ Nation will be over it so they won't boo and chant for their Brady-pie all game long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lumbergh Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Ohhh lumnuts.....now your only line of defense is telling people to fetch you coffee? that's for vegas. my request to you was to google the words dink, dunk, and quinn did you do it yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlaygroundLegend Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Hey Lums, im still waiting on your explanation on how/why Quinn won the QB battle this summer, you were so sure that DA bear was ahead and that he was going to win? What happened? I just want to hear your submis... explanation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WPB Dawg Fan Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 that's for vegas. my request to you was to google the words dink, dunk, and quinn did you do it yet? And I challenge you to do the same with this dink dunk 'tom brady' you will see that Tom Brady is considered to be a dink n dunk QB by most, but that he is also opportunistic and goes downfield on occasion. just sayin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmac12 Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Yeah, he was 5-14 for 51 yards, 1INT and 1 FUMBLE, with a 17.3 QBR vs HOU. I wouldn't want to count that game either. NFL.com offically lists his wins and losses for 2008 @ 3-7, so eat a dick. L I N K DA did not start this game though. He came in at halftime. And I know when I did his stats for last year I included it just like in 2007 I included stats from Pittsburgh but he did not start that game either. BQs stats for that START Brady Quinn CLE 8 18 94 0 2 42 with a rating of 21.3 And DA did only start 9 games, he played in 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegasdogg Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Let BQ Nation get the Bernie Kosar reminiscing out of their system. They sure the fook aren't reminiscing about 140 YPG. They don't miss 20 turnovers per season. And they certainly don't miss 17.3 QBR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegasdogg Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 BQs stats for that START LOL....even when Quinn was at his absolute worst, he still had a better stat line then DA in that game. LMAO! 5-14 51yds 35.7% 1 INT, 1 Fumble, 17.3 QBR Pathetic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lumbergh Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 you will see that Tom Brady is considered to be a dink n dunk QB by most, but that he is also opportunistic and goes downfield on occasion. so Quinn's similar but without the downfield strikes. As I was saying... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WPB Dawg Fan Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 so Quinn's similar but without the downfield strikes. As I was saying... and like I pointed out in the other thread, he took 7 shots downfield in game 1....so much for that offering lummy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Because Mangini is a more balanced, run oriented, methodical, "it's a process" type coach. He is not asking his QB to toss it up as much. Different offense, different TE, different players. Run oriented? LMAO We ran the ball 20 times and tried to throw it 40 on sunday, that is 33% run. In Anderson's first start in 07, we ran the ball 30 and threw 33. That's balance. (5 passing TDs that day, by the way). The Browns in 07 threw 545 times and rushed 440. 55% pass The Jets in 08 (Dabol and Mangini) threw 529 and rushed 422. 56% pass You have no idea what you are talking about do you? Zombo --But you are right, we have a different tight end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Anderson got his numbers in a flukey way, Yes, by throwing against NFL defenses and compiling first downs, yards, TDs and wins. Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ATENEARS Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 and like I pointed out in the other thread, he took 7 shots downfield in game 1....so much for that offering lummy I had no idea he was having that many injections ... I thought he developed normally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grimmreaper3 Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 that's for vegas. my request to you was to google the words dink, dunk, and quinn did you do it yet? Ooh, I did! No results found for "the words dink, dunk, and quinn". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.