Kosar_For_President Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 I don't think I can give you as insightful view as Steve. But a quick synopsis. Not bad. Hand held camera, blair witch like (but not all the over the top camera movement), pretty straight forward shooting. Acting is par at best. But to take it at face value; it was entertaining, a great movie for the production cost. Not as scary has all the hype, but still had me on my seat. At some points I was like "yea right". Which I hate to see in a movie. The chick in the movie is pretty hot. So all in all it's worth a DVD rental but not a theatre trip. C+ Steve let me know when you see this movie, your reviews are pretty much the shit, I'll delete this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted October 26, 2009 Report Share Posted October 26, 2009 I don't think I can give you as insightful view as Steve. But a quick synopsis. Not bad. Hand held camera, blair witch like (but not all the over the top camera movement), pretty straight forward shooting. Acting is par at best. But to take it at face value; it was entertaining, a great movie for the production cost. Not as scary has all the hype, but still had me on my seat. At some points I was like "yea right". Which I hate to see in a movie. The chick in the movie is pretty hot. So all in all it's worth a DVD rental but not a theatre trip. C+ Steve let me know when you see this movie, your reviews are pretty much the shit, I'll delete this one. Wow. Saw it last week but have yet to write it up. IMO Hands down the biggest piece of shit to come down the pike in a decade. Stunningly bad. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosar_For_President Posted October 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 26, 2009 Wow. Saw it last week but have yet to write it up. IMO Hands down the biggest piece of shit to come down the pike in a decade. Stunningly bad. WSS Come on Steve give credit were it's due. It was made for $15,000. I know it is bad and overhyped, but for that budget you can't even make a back alley porn. Give it a bit of credit for being the underdog. And you got to admit this at least, it wasn't bad staring at that chicks knockers 1/2 the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpkin Eater Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 I think the "in" thing now is to say how scared you got while watching it. For me, it was just ok. Might be worth a dollar rental at red box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 Come on Steve give credit were it's due. It was made for $15,000. I know it is bad and overhyped, but for that budget you can't even make a back alley porn. Give it a bit of credit for being the underdog. And you got to admit this at least, it wasn't bad staring at that chicks knockers 1/2 the time. Credit? Turd script Bad sound crap camerawork Not frightening at all terrible acting I've seen better in "back alley porn." So what did the 15 grand pay for? Remember they aren't in competition with only other low rent productions. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Right, and they didn't even show off enough of the chicks big tits which is what they needed to do. I can't say she was a bad actress, but those boobs needed better exposure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosar_For_President Posted November 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 1, 2009 Remember they aren't in competition with only other low rent productions. And that is the marketing genius behind it. I saw it free, so I am not complaining. I would be a little ticked if I paid for it. Still better then Paul Blart Mall Cop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosar_For_President Posted November 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 1, 2009 Right, and they didn't even show off enough of the chicks big tits which is what they needed to do. I can't say she was a bad actress, but those boobs needed better exposure. I concur. Let's see them titties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.