SoCalDog Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Gms Cmp Att Pct Yds Yds/Att TD Long INT Rating QB #1 stats: 14 188 348 54.0 2381 6.8 12 65 20 63.2 QB #2 stats: 14 184 353 52.1 1902 5.4 10 59 9 66.8 Now, over the course of this season, many of you fawned over and wished we had QB #1. QB #1 is perceived to be a legit "franchise" QB and many have called QB # 2 a "bust". Objectively speaking, there's not much of a difference in the two statistically. So why the different perceptions? QB #2 has almost the same TD's in less min. overall, but QB #1 has twice as many INT's...but QB #1 is considered the "better" QB? Note: Apologies if this Poll doesn't come out right...first time I've done a poll on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FRIZBIZ Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 ....okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steel88 Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 lol this is ridiculous they both suck and im guessing neither will be the starting qb NEW POLL Dog Crap1 Dog Crap2 one thinks he can throw through defenders and one loves to throw backwards CHOOSE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalDog Posted January 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Well, for those who haven't figured it out yet, QB #1 is the "franchise" QB that many on here wanted to draft this year who ended up with the Jets, Mark Sanchez. QB # 2 is of course Brady Quinn. I just thought it was interesting that MANY guys want or would want Sanchez and state he is a franchise QB and that Quinn is a bust. By looking at their stats, it's either, they are both franchise QB's or they both are busts. But, I never hear anyone call Sanchez a bust. Strange. But, by the votes, it does appear that people would take Quinn now instead of Sanchez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunkandstoopid Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Gms Cmp Att Pct Yds Yds/Att TD Long INT Rating QB #1 stats: 14 188 348 54.0 2381 6.8 12 65 20 63.2 QB #2 stats: 14 184 353 52.1 1902 5.4 10 59 9 66.8 Just for a little perspective, now the first 14 game stats of a guy I'm pretty sure the original poster has said doesn't belong in the NFL QB #3 stats: 14 230 409 56.2 3024 7.3 25 NA 17 82.8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalDog Posted January 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2010 Gms Cmp Att Pct Yds Yds/Att TD Long INT Rating QB #1 stats: 14 188 348 54.0 2381 6.8 12 65 20 63.2 QB #2 stats: 14 184 353 52.1 1902 5.4 10 59 9 66.8 Just for a little perspective, now the first 14 game stats of a guy I'm pretty sure the original poster has said doesn't belong in the NFL QB #3 stats: 14 230 409 56.2 3024 7.3 25 NA 17 82.8 Link? Quote? I'll take it you vote for # 2 as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClevelandFanForLife Posted January 4, 2010 Report Share Posted January 4, 2010 good comparison. i love seeing usc qb's getting crapped on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.