Ghoolie

For all I have posted about Black Tarkentons, I really can't believe the topic of this RG4 QB even got responses.

People, people, people.............do I have to start putting red flag caution indicator on some of this crap? My ONLY sober thought on this idiotic topic was really to insinuate that Jackson would be another RG crapola waste of time. Good grief, the only thing this kid is going to toast is the Ravens. Still, I wouldn't have been surprised if Hue took him.

I am good with Mayfield. SOmewhere back in all this pile, I believe he was the guy I said we should go after. Again, the QB lottery is a guess. We chose one of the top QBs. YOu can't ask for more than that. What happens, happens. We will see.

1 hour ago, MLD Woody said:

Please go direct your trolling somewhere else Ghoolie. You can't have such a hole in your life that you need to post nonsense in literally every thread...

Hey, when you get done blowing yourself, fetch me some coffee.

49 minutes ago, SD_Tom said:

He had a lot of passing yards and made plenty of nfl type throws this past season. 

Seems like a good kid.  Hoping he proves haters wrong. 

He's a throw first qb in 2017. Goes thru progressions... His runs were mostly designed. He's underrated as a passer.  The improvement each season is a good sign. 

As I told the resident Transgender pee-pee kisser Cysco Clit, the Browns had no support for such a QB, the Ravens are a different thing altogether.

16 minutes ago, The Cysko Kid said:

Horse sh!t if we'd have taken him you'd be screaming about how the Retarded browns took a stupid @ss learning disabled black tarkenton. I don't know how something with so much mass can be completely transparent but there you are

Look, butt phuk, If we took Lamar Jackson at #1  #1   or  #1  #4.................YES, I would be blasting black Tarkenton. HOWEVER, The Ravens have an established QB with some time left. THey have weapons for the kid and they have a good offensive program. The Browns do not have an established QB, weapons, or a strong offensive coach. TOTALLY different. 

7 minutes ago, jcam222 said:

He certainly seems likeable. His intelligence concerns however go well beyond his Wonderlic score. 

For the record, I think the Browns made a mistake not grooming Kizer and giving him a real opportunity. I hope Jackson does well. The kid will be breathing down Flaccos neck.

1 minute ago, Westside Steve said:

So, Tommy, you were getting wood for little black Tarkenton too?

🤣

WSS

Nah, I don't like run first QBs........................ HOWEVER................ taking a Hiesman winner at 32 who has real NFL QB size, is a fukck of a lot better draft move than taking a midget at #1 #1.

Barkley was the pick for the Browns. Hey will regret it for many years to come. This has to be the dumbest fukcking draft I have ever seen. Dumber than last year's IF that is possible. 

2 minutes ago, SD_Tom said:

Jackson is awesome.  Great situation for him.  

I don't like run-first QBs, but am sick of people talking about him being a dummy and referring to his meaningless Wunderlick score. He is a good kid, and I hope he toasts the living schidt out of the Browns.If you want to talk dummies, you talk Dorsey. Passing on an OJ caliber RB for a QB that you could have taken much lower? 

So much for the Browns being smart asset managers. The days of a small QB doing well in the NFL are done. hey will die with the retirement of Drew Brees.

3 minutes ago, MLD Woody said:

I feel like this is gonna be bad for us in a year or so

D' uh..............do ya think so? Dude....................... We have DORSEY................ what the hell did you think was going to happen here?

Schidt. That is what ALL BROWNS FANS EAT ON GAME DAY.