Jump to content

EPA Considering Ban on All Traditional Ammunition

Mr. T

Recommended Posts

EPA Considering Ban on All Traditional Ammunition


NEWTOWN, Conn --(Ammoland.com)- All Gun Owners, Hunters and Shooters:


With the fall hunting season fast approaching, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under Lisa Jackson, who was responsible for banning bear hunting in New Jersey, is now considering a petition by the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) – a leading anti-hunting organization – to ban all traditional ammunition under the Toxic Substance Control Act of 1976, a law in which Congress expressly exempted ammunition.


If the EPA approves the petition, the result will be a total ban on all ammunition containing lead-core components, including hunting and target-shooting rounds. The EPA must decide to accept or reject this petition by November 1, 2010, the day before the midterm elections.


Today, the EPA has opened to public comment the CBD petition. The comment period ends on October 31, 2010.


The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) — the trade association for the firearms, ammunition, hunting and shooting sports industry – urges you to submit comment to the EPA opposing any ban on traditional ammunition. Remember, your right to choose the ammunition you hunt and shoot with is at stake.


The EPA has published the petition and relevant supplemental information as Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0681. If you would like to read the original petition and see the contents of this docket folder, please click here


NSSF urges you to stress the following in your opposition:


•There is no scientific evidence that the use of traditional ammunition is having an adverse impact on wildlife populations.

•Wildlife management is the proper jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services and the 50 state wildlife agencies.

•A 2008 study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on blood lead levels of North Dakota hunters confirmed that consuming game harvested with traditional ammunition does not pose a human health risk.

•A ban on traditional ammunition would have a negative impact on wildlife conservation. The federal excise tax that manufacturers pay on the sale of the ammunition (11 percent) is a primary source of wildlife conservation funding. The bald eagle’s recovery, considered to be a great conservation success story, was made possible and funded by hunters using traditional ammunition – the very ammunition organizations like the CBD are now demonizing.

•Recent statistics from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service show that from 1981 to 2006 the number of breeding pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased 724 percent. And much like the bald eagle, raptor populations throughout the United States are soaring.

Steps to take:


1.Submit comment online to the EPA.

2.Contact Lisa Jackson directly to voice your opposition to the ban:

Lisa P. Jackson

Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20460

(202) 564-4700

Fax: (202) 501-1450

Email: jackson.lisa@epa.gov



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I am not against banning lead... I think lead sinkers should be banned in fishing...


so should lead shot.


Eventually, over the years, it will find it's way into our ground water and food supply.


Now, banning brass and any other kind of alternative to eliminate hunting altogether is the concern,


and obviously the true intention of the anti-hunting lobby's petition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe, btw, that bear hunting must be allowed, or they will proliferate to unmanageable levels.


I do hear that they aren't good to eat though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Create New...