Nw220 Posted April 27, 2011 Report Share Posted April 27, 2011 If both Peterson and Green are gone when we are there i believe this is are best option,that would mean most likely Gabbert is still on the board for them.. http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000d5d81f7f7de/article/redskins-look-to-move-up-in-draft-take-missouri-qb-gabbert?module=HP_headlines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choco Posted April 27, 2011 Report Share Posted April 27, 2011 watt would be available at 10.....but they dont have many picks to deal with. perhaps their first next year, as they likely be picking top 15 again anyway. tough call.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted April 27, 2011 Report Share Posted April 27, 2011 watt would be available at 10.....but they dont have many picks to deal with. perhaps their first next year, as they likely be picking top 15 again anyway. tough call.... Yeah, that would be the price- or swap places, and it costs them their second this year. Question is do they value either QB highly enough to essentially trash this years draft- they don't have another pick until the 5th round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted April 27, 2011 Report Share Posted April 27, 2011 If they don't have another pick this year until the 5th...forget trading with them. I want some instant gratification in the deal...I am tired of waiting for next year. I want to add players this year. Then again...if Peterson and Green are gone....???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted April 27, 2011 Report Share Posted April 27, 2011 If both Peterson and Green are gone when we are there i believe this is are best option,that would mean most likely Gabbert is still on the board for them.. http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000d5d81f7f7de/article/redskins-look-to-move-up-in-draft-take-missouri-qb-gabbert?module=HP_headlines Essentially, this article says that the Redskins don't even have the assets valuable enough in this draft to trade up to #6 with the Browns to grab Gabbert or Locker. What would you want in return for the Browns to move down to #10? They don't have a Round 2 pick. How about next year's #1, plus like an additional 5th or 6th rounder in this draft. Would you make that deal? To recap: Browns trade #6 to Wash. Get back #10 this year and next year's #1 and a 5th or 6th rounder this year? Deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cribbs is the man Posted April 28, 2011 Report Share Posted April 28, 2011 Maybe players and picks next year? With the lockout, players cannot be traded this year on draft day.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cribbs is the man Posted April 28, 2011 Report Share Posted April 28, 2011 Essentially, this article says that the Redskins don't even have the assets valuable enough in this draft to trade up to #6 with the Browns to grab Gabbert or Locker. What would you want in return for the Browns to move down to #10? They don't have a Round 2 pick. How about next year's #1, plus like an additional 5th or 6th rounder in this draft. Would you make that deal? To recap: Browns trade #6 to Wash. Get back #10 this year and next year's #1 and a 5th or 6th rounder this year? Deal? I would absolutely drop back 4 slots for a 1st rounder next year straight up... that is a bit unrealistic I think though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMcCurry08 Posted April 28, 2011 Report Share Posted April 28, 2011 Essentially, this article says that the Redskins don't even have the assets valuable enough in this draft to trade up to #6 with the Browns to grab Gabbert or Locker. What would you want in return for the Browns to move down to #10? They don't have a Round 2 pick. How about next year's #1, plus like an additional 5th or 6th rounder in this draft. Would you make that deal? To recap: Browns trade #6 to Wash. Get back #10 this year and next year's #1 and a 5th or 6th rounder this year? Deal? Make a 4th rounder plus #10 and 2012 1st rounder and we'd have a deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.