Represent Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Posistives We're 3-3 playing 500 ball Defense looked stout but not saying much against a team that looked worse then any of our previous offensive performances. So-So's None really other than Hardesty touched the ball a shit load, so i expected his numbers to look better, but he did what we asked him to do and eat up that clock. Negatives Our offense looks terrible, i can't believe we are 3-3 our defense deserves a god damned gold medal. Hillis out again, personally defend him every week but i am getting iffy. Biggest offenders last few weeks, our special teams looks terrible period all aspects are playing like they are a JV Squad in BFE, seriously looks dead last in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burtond16vtec Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Bone Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Positives: We won Played D very well The new RB looks quick Negatives: Looked pathetic on offense Looked pathetic on special teams Coaching adjustments were non existent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Buffalo Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Ya that new RB did great catching out of the back field, got us some good first downs. Looks to be a good addition as a 3rd down back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbndawg Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Positive for today: I am not a Seahawk fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob806 Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Positive for today: I am not a Seahawk fan. Amen, but their D line looked great. Unless it's our O-line, they haven't looked too good all year. I don't get the blocked FGs either. We have never looked so crappy on special teams as we have in 2011. I will take 3-3....on to San Fran... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gips Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Posistives We're 3-3 playing 500 ball Defense looked stout but not saying much against a team that looked worse then any of our previous offensive performances. So-So's None really other than Hardesty touched the ball a shit load, so i expected his numbers to look better, but he did what we asked him to do and eat up that clock. Negatives Our offense looks terrible, i can't believe we are 3-3 our defense deserves a god damned gold medal. Hillis out again, personally defend him every week but i am getting iffy. Biggest offenders last few weeks, our special teams looks terrible period all aspects are playing like they are a JV Squad in BFE, seriously looks dead last in the NFL. /agree and the new running back looks like a good addition.. With 40 minutes of possession time things got a little closer to clicking offensively today than the score indicates, its only a matter of time.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burtond16vtec Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 We need to give the other recievers on the rostrer a shot. We should never see Robiskie on the field again and Mohommad Massivequeef needs to be replaced. Also 5 yard routes in the middle are getting old and never seem to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slowburn Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Defense played lights out. Don't think it would have made much difference in outcome had Sea played starting QB and RB. Browns should move up in total defense rankings from their current number 7 spot. Browns were missing 4 starters on offense and got pretty decent performance from back ups. Colt managed game. Played witnin his capabilities keeping f ups to a minimum. Thought play calling improved this week although vertical game still pretty lame. Passing game needs a shot in the arm quick with top 3 ranked NFL defensive teams looming in our division. Browns played tough the entire game. Not pretty by any stretch but the team did show some improvements. A win is a win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheepdog Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Being that I am at work I was only able to catch highlights from the NFL Redzone channel and with no touchdowns scored there weren't many. From what I did see and from what I followed at nfl.com this is my interpretation of the game; Positives- -We won, at .500 which is good going into SF. -Defense played good when Seattle was in the redzone, played good overall. D-line is coming together. Neither good nor bad- -Hardesty rushed a lot but still averaged under 3 ypc. Negatives- -Offense didn't generate anything. -Special teams let two FGs get blocked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slowburn Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Hard got the rock 33 times rushing for just under a hundred yards. No fumbles or dropped passes if i remember correctly. Blue collar kind of game against the 7th ranked NFL defense against the run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batsandgats Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 When is the last time a back got over 30 carries without a 100 yards or a td? Not to mention he only rushed for 2 first downs. I don't see how that can't be a negative. I would have rather seen the other guy in, he has better hands, wonder how he would have looked running, he had 1 first down rushing with 3 carries and looked great receiving, he is one of the few positives from the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrb12711 Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Good defensive rush defense was a good reason, but I also thought hardesty missed at least 4-5 wide opens lanes to run throughout the game. Good blue-collar game and i think he can get a lot better, but his vision needs to get stronger. 3-3 is just fine with me though. We absolutely have to take more chances down the field to have a chance to win though, by my count there were 2. One incomplete and one INT. Both were brutal to watch but i'd still rather see that than nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRREBEL Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 i told you we would win.. Positives we won.. and solid D Negatives. oline, QB PLAY, WRS, Special teams.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choco Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 not much to be said about a 6-3 game with 2 inept offenses and 2 young defenses. strangely, this win doesn't do much for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Bone Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Who feels better about a 3-3 record, The Cowboys or The Browns? Not even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choco Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 i would say the cowboys there. we've beaten nobodies, barely. they've lost some nailbiters against...dare i say...good teams. meaning, record notwithstanding, they actually look like a football team. no one is looing at our 3-3 record and thinking we are a contender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 yeah and the steelers still have a shot because of their talent. we have no shot. none. unless of course somebody nukes baltimore and pittsburgh. but then wed still have to deal with cincy who at this point in the season look like super bowl contenders compared to us. positives: D line negatives: everything else we are terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbinoRhino40 Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Positives: D-line Joe Haden TJ Ward - sans 1 blown coverage play Greg Little - When he gets the ball Hardesty held up for 33 carries So-so's: Linebackers - our D is great despite these guys, but they don't make mistakes Colt McCoy - this is a good so-so b/c he only made 2-3 mistakes, but also made 2-3 great plays with his legs. He played well for the lack of time in the pocket he had all game Negatives: OFFENSIVE LINE is terrible - these guys need to step it up immediately, or Colt is dead SPECIAL TEAMS - WTF?? Wide Recievers - escept Greg Little, but especially Josh Cribbs - downright bad game for him It's hard for me to say this, but it seems that our offense is slowly getting better. I'd like to see Hillis get back in there and get a chance to run it 25-30 times. Maybe he could loosen up the D and give Colt a little time to throw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbinoRhino40 Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Positives: D-line Joe Haden TJ Ward - sans 1 blown coverage play Greg Little - When he gets the ball Hardesty held up for 33 carries So-so's: Linebackers - our D is great despite these guys, but they don't make mistakes Colt McCoy - this is a good so-so b/c he only made 2-3 mistakes, but also made 2-3 great plays with his legs. He played well for the lack of time in the pocket he had all game Negatives: OFFENSIVE LINE is terrible - these guys need to step it up immediately, or Colt is dead SPECIAL TEAMS - WTF?? Wide Recievers - escept Greg Little, but especially Josh Cribbs - downright bad game for him It's hard for me to say this, but it seems that our offense is slowly getting better. I'd like to see Hillis get back in there and get a chance to run it 25-30 times. Maybe he could loosen up the D and give Colt a little time to throw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choco Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 agreed mik... positive: young D dominating a bad offense, which they should do little startng to come thru negatives: everything and everyone else headscratcher: shurmur finally deciding to run the ball against one of the better run defenses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted October 24, 2011 Report Share Posted October 24, 2011 headscratcher to me was the no adjustments at halftime. i mean you gotta. see that they're blitzing every play. i've seen high school coaches counter that better than this crew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdl15 Posted October 24, 2011 Report Share Posted October 24, 2011 Not a bad game for hardestys FIRST full game. And against one of the NFL's biggest D lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrb12711 Posted October 24, 2011 Report Share Posted October 24, 2011 headscratcher to me was the no adjustments at halftime. i mean you gotta. see that they're blitzing every play. i've seen high school coaches counter that better than this crew. a friking men buddy, couldn't agree more. Coaching just isn't there at this point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tampadawgs Posted October 24, 2011 Report Share Posted October 24, 2011 Postives We won Defense Hardesty Say what you will, they knew we running and we still grind out 95yrs WE beat a team that has won a game!!! Neg Colt Mccoy been saying it for a while O-line cant really put them on here, they were banged up...I will give them a pass Listen the fact that we won I will give Colt a pass, problem we are facing S.F next week. Again if COlt plays like we did,we will get crushed. Defense will have hands full with Gore and Davis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4Browns Posted October 24, 2011 Report Share Posted October 24, 2011 I have to say the posters here come up with some of the funniest shit when it comes to plays on peoples names. Massivequeef? Hilarious. We need to give the other recievers on the rostrer a shot. We should never see Robiskie on the field again and Mohommad Massivequeef needs to be replaced. Also 5 yard routes in the middle are getting old and never seem to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted October 24, 2011 Report Share Posted October 24, 2011 we do have some very original thinkers around here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Buffalo Posted October 24, 2011 Report Share Posted October 24, 2011 New defensive rankings in the NFL. 1, Cincy. 2, Pitt. 3, Balt. 4. Cleveland. Ya were all playing the NFC West, but who cares we haven't been ranked this high in god knows how long and it's just cool to see the whole conference in the top 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burtond16vtec Posted October 24, 2011 Report Share Posted October 24, 2011 Haha thanks. I was tired of using momass because it possibly sounds like he might be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Represent Posted October 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 24, 2011 New defensive rankings in the NFL. 1, Cincy. 2, Pitt. 3, Balt. 4. Cleveland. Ya were all playing the NFC West, but who cares we haven't been ranked this high in god knows how long and it's just cool to see the whole conference in the top 4. I posted the browns would be a top 10 Defense and a majority of the votes were haters, browns will be fine and we will be fighting for a playoff spot in December mark it down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.