calfoxwc Posted April 17, 2012 Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 http://www.americant...merica_rev.html http://www.thegatewa...n-their-caucus/ The Socialist Party of America announced in their October 2009 newsletter that 70 Congressional democrats currently belong to their caucus. This admission was recently posted on Scribd.com: American Socialist Voter Q: How many members of the U.S. Congress are also members of the DSA? A: Seventy Q: How many of the DSA members sit on the Judiciary Committee? A: Eleven: John Conyers [Chairman of the Judiciary Committee], Tammy Baldwin, Jerrold Nadler, Luis Gutierrez, Melvin Watt, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Steve Cohen, Barbara Lee, Robert Wexler, Linda Sanchez [there are 23 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee of which eleven, almost half, are now members of the DSA]. Q: Who are these members of 111th Congress? A: See the listing below Co-Chairs Hon. Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07) Hon. Lynn Woolsey (CA-06) Vice Chairs Hon. Diane Watson (CA-33) Hon. Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18) Hon. Mazie Hirono (HI-02) Hon. Dennis Kucinich (OH-10) Senate Members Hon. Bernie Sanders (VT) House Members Hon. Neil Abercrombie (HI-01) Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02) Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31) Hon. Madeleine Bordallo (GU-AL) Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01) Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03) Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08) Hon. André Carson (IN-07) Hon. Donna Christensen (VI-AL) Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11) Hon. William "Lacy" Clay (MO-01) Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05) Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09) Hon. John Conyers (MI-14) Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07) Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07) Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04) Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03) Rep. Donna F. Edwards (MD-04) Hon. Keith Ellison (MN-05) Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17) Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02) Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51) Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04) Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11) Hon. Alan Grayson (FL-08) Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04) Hon. John Hall (NY-19) Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17) Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22) Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15) Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02) Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30) Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04) Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09) Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13) Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09) Hon. John Lewis (GA-05) Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02) Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3) Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14) Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07) Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07) Hon. James McGovern (MA-03) Hon. George Miller (CA-07) Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04) Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08) Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL) Hon. John Olver (MA-01) Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04) Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10) Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01) Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15) Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37) Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34) Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01) Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-47) Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09) Hon. José Serrano (NY-16) Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28) Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13) Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02) Hon. John Tierney (MA-06) Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12) Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35) Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12) Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30) Hon. Peter Welch (VT-AL) Hon. Robert Wexler (FL-19) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 17, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 So, who was ignorant on the issue? Heck was. It was his knee-jerk, emotional reaction to what West said. Believe it now, Heck? Remember, Marx himself said, that socialism was the step toward communism. So, in effect...... it is how West said it was. Wow. What an ass-kicking to a lib wonk who personally attacks others on this board, unprovoked, when he should be getting his own house in order. Pretty embarrassing, right Heck? Heck's gaffe a classic all time proof that conservatives don't just react knee jerk. Proven... BY a jerk. "haha" right back at ya, Heck. Have a nice day sittin in your own crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 17, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 Yes, folks. It's what the libs do. They lie, they'll do anything, be negative about everything... because they want a paid existance, paid for by the rest of us. After all, people like Heck, Shep, MosquitoZits, and Woody are really special and deserve to have their every need subsidized. All at the simple cost... of their vote. well, and at the cost of the rest of us who DO believe in principles, values, and America. And our freedom, and our military. And our families. and our Constitution. The rest? Losers. Moochers. They just justify dragging the system down with their greed and sloth.... by saying that not having others' riches... "isn't fair". In conclusion - I say, that socialists need to be out of our gov. Because they are against it. @@ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 17, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 Oh, btw, those dirtbags listed.... are just the official members. There pretty much are figured to be all sorts of "sympathizers" who are, for all intents and purposes, socialists, too. Just like our dirtbag president. Which explains most of what he does, and sometimes actually says... in vague terms.... We are in really serious trouble as a country. Our gov is infiltrated by losers who want America to lose at every turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted April 17, 2012 Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 Lol are you done talking to yourself? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. T Posted April 17, 2012 Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 Lol are you done talking to yourself? You dont read much do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 17, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 Come on, Woody. muster up some nerve and comment on the thread. I showed you the list, put out by the socialist org itself. Any intelligent comment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted April 17, 2012 Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 Come on, Woody. muster up some nerve and comment on the thread. I showed you the list, put out by the socialist org itself. Any intelligent comment? I don't even remember what this is in reference too. I know there was a Rep guy that said a bunch of Dems are socialists or something and Heck thought that was ridiculous and now you are posting info to call Heck out. I'd have to look back at the original thing and then actually check through your info making sure its accurate... .... I just don't care right now. I've got so much more important shit to do. Just ask Vapor. We are getting into finals we. We are busy becoming tomorrow's leader's and intellectual pillars as doctors and engineers. If I want to make a long ass comment later I will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heckofajobbrownie Posted April 18, 2012 Report Share Posted April 18, 2012 I can't believe I'm doing this, but Cal, there is no "Socialist Caucus" in Congress. This list is complete bullshit. It's a list of the members of the Progressive Caucus. There is one admitted socialist in Congress, and it's Bernie Sanders from Vermont, who is an Independent, not a Democrat. You can freak out about him all you like. Secondly, West called members of the Progressive Caucus "Communists" not "socialists" so your point isn't valid even if it were true, which it isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted April 18, 2012 Report Share Posted April 18, 2012 You should summon Joe mccarthy from hell and the two of you can clean house of these pinko liberal Scum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heckofajobbrownie Posted April 18, 2012 Report Share Posted April 18, 2012 i dont think they would admit to it? its not popular to come out of the closet in the free world. Commies are tricky that way. Cal, do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water, why, there are studies underway to fluoridate salt, flour, fruit juices, soup, sugar, milk... ice cream. Ice cream, Cal, children's ice cream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 18, 2012 Report Share Posted April 18, 2012 You should summon Joe mccarthy from hell and the two of you can clean house of these pinko liberal Scum. Of course as zealous as joe may have been during the cold war the communists actually were as close to an enemy as we had. We tend to confuse the ideal of communism and the dictatorship the russian government became. I suppose if you boiled down the direction al qaeda wants the middle east to go you could find plenty of u s citizens who agree. Would anyone here be comfortable with al qaeda sympathizers in congress? And do u s citizens have a right to believe in that? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob806 Posted April 18, 2012 Report Share Posted April 18, 2012 Yes, folks. It's what the libs do. They lie, they'll do anything, be negative about everything... well, and at the cost of the rest of us who DO believe in principles, values, and America. And our freedom, and our military. And our families. and our Constitution. The rest? Losers. Moochers. They just justify dragging the system down with their greed and sloth.... by saying that not having others' riches... "isn't fair". Read carefully what you wrote there, and then close your eyes and think of the (apparent) Republican nominee, Mitt Romney. Principles..."I don't need to disclose my ENTIRE tax returns, I play by my own rules here" Values....he has basically shunned everything his father taught him, alienating unions Greed...I won't say he is necessarily greedy, but he definitely took full advantage of capitalism at the expense of AMERICAN workers to get wealthy Sloth...nope, I don't think he's a sloth Losers/Moochers...yes, they exist, always have, doesn't mean it's correct "Isn't fair"...taking full advantage of the rules, for personal/corporate gain at the expense of the American worker is total bullshit, IMHO We will be worse off if Romney is elected. Obama does suck, I agree, but Romney & the neo-Rs, the Tea Party, will ultimately ruin the average US citizen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted April 18, 2012 Report Share Posted April 18, 2012 well bob806 if the unions had the majority of the vote we wouldn't have to bother with elecetions then would we? its the whole socialist system that has been set up by our very own 2 party system that has created this conundrum and i dont see us shrinking the government payroll anytime soon. so it looks like we will be greeks soon enough. Shrink the government payroll? Sure. I'm sure Obama and your man, mitt romney would be willing to take a paycut and live like the common rabble they pretend to care about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob806 Posted April 18, 2012 Report Share Posted April 18, 2012 that is what i am saying, they have used the unions to gain power by adding more union jobs to strengthen their base. and since this has allready happened and these jobs will not be cut!!!!! who is paying these absorbement amounts of money that are guaranteed to these workers? we dont have enough money and cannot tax enough to cover all the perks and benefits that are guaranteed to these union gov. workers. Bunker, come on now. You have some validity when you state there isn't enough money to cover all the perks & benefits. I don't have all the answers, but I do have years of contract negotiation experience. There have been plenty of concessions at the bargaining table from unionized workers in the last 5 years or so. However, if you want to drink the Kool Aid from Kasich & company & blame 13% of the population for our economic ills, that's downright insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted April 18, 2012 Report Share Posted April 18, 2012 I think people shouldn't buy things they can't afford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 19, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 Principles..."I don't need to disclose my ENTIRE tax returns, I play by my own rules here" Values....he has basically shunned everything his father taught him, alienating unions Greed...I won't say he is necessarily greedy, but he definitely took full advantage of capitalism at the expense of AMERICAN workers to get wealthy Sloth...nope, I don't think he's a sloth Losers/Moochers...yes, they exist, always have, doesn't mean it's correct "Isn't fair"...taking full advantage of the rules, for personal/corporate gain at the expense of the American worker is total bullshit, IMHO ***************** But Bob, you are changing the subject. Heck ridiculed West, when West was accurate more than you will admit. The Socialists put out the list. So what's his name ... Sanders? Is the only one who ADMITS it. The rest have a huge reason to deny it. But the truth is, it's what they say, what they do, that is explained perfectly, by them being socialists in an official way. When did Obamao post his tax returns and birth certificate the first time around? Even his LAWYER admits, that that certificate is not genuine. And, Romney doesn't need to - it will only be used as fodder if the left can use it that way, for villifying him for not being black, and poor, and Muslim but "Christian" but neither.... Romney alienated unions? Then I'm on board with him in a huge way. Unions, all sorts of them... SUCK. The SEIU is a "union". The AFL-CIO is a "union". Not American, though. Romney didn't take advantage of nothin. He had a high profile job. Like, every single salaried manager is taking "advantage" of every hourly? That's baloney. I accept Romney far easier, than Obamao, with his communist mentors, favorite socialist professors, his communist father, and his violent, and sick in the head radicals as his friends, and all over his stinkin corrupt regime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob806 Posted April 19, 2012 Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 I accept Romney far easier, than Obamao, with his communist mentors, favorite socialist professors, his communist father, and his violent, and sick in the head radicals as his friends, and all over his stinkin corrupt regime. I'm voting for someone not on the "D" or "R" ticket, again. While many say that is stupid, I say it's my only chance to vote my distrust of the 2-party system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 19, 2012 Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 I'm voting for someone not on the "D" or "R" ticket, again. While many say that is stupid, I say it's my only chance to vote my distrust of the 2-party system. Jimmy Hoffa? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 19, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 Okie-dokie, Bob, I understand protest votes. I'll be protesting the corruption and socialist agenda by Obamao....voting for Romney, he isn't my first, second or third pick either. but if the election is decided by just a few votes, and we go into a civil war to protect our Constitution and freedoms.... you won't be a happy camper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted April 19, 2012 Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 They'll be a tiny little pocket of white AARP members that will gear up for this "Civil War" only to realize no one gives a shit, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heckofajobbrownie Posted April 19, 2012 Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 Oh, what epistemic cloture hath wrought, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob806 Posted April 19, 2012 Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 Okie-dokie, Bob, I understand protest votes. I'll be protesting the corruption and socialist agenda by Obamao....voting for Romney, he isn't my first, second or third pick either. but if the election is decided by just a few votes, and we go into a civil war to protect our Constitution and freedoms.... you won't be a happy camper. True, but I cannot bring myself to vote for Romney. Obama was elected for "change," and that's what I'm thinking may happen again. Unless something remarkable happens in the next 5-6 months, it's Romney's election to lose. People are understandably fed up with the status quo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heckofajobbrownie Posted April 19, 2012 Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 I'm glad you nominated Romney. We get a moderate Democrat either way. Romney will pay lip service to the Republican base, just like he just did for the last two years, but he's done with you now. It's back to being a moderate for the general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 19, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 leftist, corrupt, lying dirtbag socialist/communist/fascist vs not so moderate Republican from a liberal state. Most of real America will go for the latter. Even you have to know that the obamao regime is really frantic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted April 19, 2012 Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 leftist, corrupt, lying dirtbag socialist/communist/fascist vs not so moderate Republican from a liberal state. Most of real America will go for the latter. Even you have to know that the obamao regime is really frantic. what is real America? what makes certain parts of America real and what makes the other parts "not real"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 19, 2012 Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 I'm glad you nominated Romney. We get a moderate Democrat either way. Romney will pay lip service to the Republican base, just like he just did for the last two years, but he's done with you now. It's back to being a moderate for the general. And I'm sure you will defend him with every fiber of your being when axelrod and the gang paint him as Hitler light. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heckofajobbrownie Posted April 19, 2012 Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 If he deserves it. He's certainly not my preferred candidate, and I don't want anyone in office, even Romney, who has to answer to the base of the Republican Party. That'd be you nuts. But if it has to be someone, I prefer Romney. He's smart. He's capable. He's not mean-spirited. He takes his job seriously. If history is any guide, he'll appoint some good people to work with him. Like the first President Bush, I expect the plums thrown to the base to be mostly symbolic. The problem with Romney is that you have no idea what guy you're going to get. You can only make an educated guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpkin Eater Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 .... I just don't care right now. I've got so much more important shit to do. Just ask Vapor. We are getting into finals we. We are busy becoming tomorrow's leader's and intellectual pillars as doctors and engineers. If I want to make a long ass comment later I will. get any more full of yourself and you'll end up choking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 get any more full of yourself and you'll end up choking. Hopefully not in the next 7 days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.