FairHooker11 Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 #! Dr. Garrow source "Yes it is ok to stand firm" I visited my son last week- active duty.... this issue is abuzz in the ranks, but cannot talk about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 oh, crap. I didn't see that... naturally, the libs on the board won't comment. Anything to protect the name of their figurehead, eh? This is crap. Bush, btw, was talking about martial in WARTIME. OBAMAO the Marxist Pig changed it to .....PEACETIME. And, he's throwing money over the cliff as fast as he can, and he's constanting and beligerantly throwing the race card out, constantly trying to aggravate a class war in eh...one fashion or another, trying to get as many guns to be outlawed as possible, denigrating Americans who "cling to their guns and religion", constantly maneuvering to establish fed control of...school lunches, religious and school morality (see abortion coverage, etc, in ObamaoIdon'tcare.... establishing a fed intimidation/control over various industries .... auto, health, banking, education, corrupting and putting our military into disarray, circumventing Congress and our Constitution at point he can try to circumvent it, minimalizing our rights via our Constitution. based on world history - we are headed for very serious trouble as a country. He even SAID he found our Constitution to be a problem. Here's a few more links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAVGkU7_OQ4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted February 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 thanks Cal for the added links.... speaking to the martial law portion - it was very telling when during the Iran/Contra hearings - Oliver North questioning that Brooks direct question regarding US GOV implementation of martial law was interrupted and quelled by the late Hawaii Senator Daniel Inouye! (I never knew this) secondly- the use and implementation of police drones are starting up and the NC policeman testimony and summary- "trust the Lord and prepare" prepare for what? civil war? - like Dr. Garrows high ranking officer (identity concealed) plainly making a case that starts with the "litmus test" question, Not only asked to NEW recruits in officers training... BUT in the ranks as a whole, current officers.... the result being one resigning his commision because he said "NO!" this is where we seem to lose the attention of the libs here regarding the natural slow scale insidious power grab of this administration. I agree with your assertion of the countries freefall into who knows what, made worse by apathy and moral decay, let alone the tampering of the 1st , 2nd and 3rd ammendments.... JMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 thanks Cal for the added links.... speaking to the martial law portion - it was very telling when during the Iran/Contra hearings - Oliver North questioning that Brooks direct question regarding US GOV implementation of martial law was interrupted and quelled by the late Hawaii Senator Daniel Inouye! (I never knew this) secondly- the use and implementation of police drones are starting up and the NC policeman testimony and summary- "trust the Lord and prepare" prepare for what? civil war? - like Dr. Garrows high ranking officer (identity concealed) plainly making a case that starts with the "litmus test" question, Not only asked to NEW recruits in officers training... BUT in the ranks as a whole, current officers.... the result being one resigning his commision because he said "NO!" this is where we seem to lose the attention of the libs here regarding the natural slow scale insidious power grab of this administration. I agree with your assertion of the countries freefall into who knows what, made worse by apathy and moral decay, let alone the tampering of the 1st , 2nd and 3rd ammendments.... JMHO To be fair though, in the oath of enlistment or reenlistment there has always been "against all enemies foreign and domestic". So you could argue that if there is an armed attempt to overthrow the government the authority is already there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted February 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 "and to defend the constitution" would be all that is needed to default to that stance SIGN ME UP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted February 7, 2013 Report Share Posted February 7, 2013 To be fair though, in the oath of enlistment or reenlistment there has always been "against all enemies foreign and domestic". So you could argue that if there is an armed attempt to overthrow the government the authority is already there. Excellent point. As was with the War between the states, it would be again, people would choose sides President Obama commands in title only. If given a choice, the guy is overthrown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.