Legacy Fan Posted January 20, 2014 Report Share Posted January 20, 2014 This is the same level of "informed on the subject" you can expect for your healthcare laws too, dummies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted January 20, 2014 Report Share Posted January 20, 2014 more from the land of nuts and flakes..... "We have federal regulations and state laws that prohibit hunting ducks with more than three rounds. And yet it's legal to hunt humans with 15-round, 30-round, even 150-round magazines." .Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-California) made this comment during a March 7 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on gun control, claiming her proposed semi-automatic weapons ban would finally make it illegal to hunt people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted January 20, 2014 Report Share Posted January 20, 2014 30 rounds in 1/2 second. Wow. Thats something hey Woody? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted January 20, 2014 Report Share Posted January 20, 2014 I also believe hunting people should be illegal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 Great trigger control, Feinstein. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 I am not sure I would throw out everything someone has to say because of what I hope is a slip up. But then again I wouldnt be too surprised he was just uniformed. Our politicians legislate things they know nothing about all of the time. The internet, technology, climate policy, etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 My dad always told me that you eat what you kill. If everyone followed that advice the world would be better off. Wait... you want murderers to be cannibals too? Or are you hoping the cannibalism would turn them off from it in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 Right, so if a politician makes an idiot of himself, we should disregard the entire argument? Then should we disregard religion because of this guy? No. The guy in the OP is a Retarded dick that causes the kind of hate that we see here. Gun lovers see anti-gun people as being like this guy, wildly uninformed and completely idiotic. Gun haters see all gun lovers as shotgun toting hillbillies that like to celebrate a nice meal by firing their gun off in to the air, or the kind that will take offence to someone disagreeing them and then go out back and get his gun. It's that kind of thing that prevents any kind of sensible discourse between the two sides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Fan Posted January 21, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 Great trigger control, Feinstein. +1 Ha! I think the video from where that pic was taken shows a frightening lack of muzzle control as well. Basically just sprayed all of the media-types covering the presser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Fan Posted January 21, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 Right, so if a politician makes an idiot of himself, we should disregard the entire argument? Then should we disregard religion because of this guy? No. The guy in the OP is a Retarded dick that causes the kind of hate that we see here. Gun lovers see anti-gun people as being like this guy, wildly uninformed and completely idiotic. Gun haters see all gun lovers as shotgun toting hillbillies that like to celebrate a nice meal by firing their gun off in to the air, or the kind that will take offence to someone disagreeing them and then go out back and get his gun. It's that kind of thing that prevents any kind of sensible discourse between the two sides. Apples & oranges. That UKIP guy was basically Pat Robertson saying the "gays were responsible for hurricane Katrina" or whatever he said. Idiotic, but not really endangering a constitutionally protected right. The dope in the OP is trying to ban something he clearly knows nothing about. Completely different. Welcome back, straw man. Cant say you were missed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 Wait... you want murderers to be cannibals too? Or are you hoping the cannibalism would turn them off from it in the first place? Back to cannibalism? Are you pro or con this time woody? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 Back to cannibalism? Are you pro or con this time woody? WSS I am what I was before. Sorry if reasoning through things throws you off. I could see how that wouldnt make sense on this board... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 Big difference between human reasoning, and what peckerheads do. "exists" A lot like claiming you've read a book, by only getting past the first two words... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 I am what I was before. Sorry if reasoning through things throws you off. I could see how that wouldnt make sense on this board... No need to apologize. You just don't communicate all that well; we understand. As I recall you weren't quite clear if it was even legal or not. But you brought it up. (don't worry, I assume you're mathematical skills are good) WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 If he's an engineering student, the USA is really fucked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 No need to apologize. You just don't communicate all that well; we understand. As I recall you weren't quite clear if it was even legal or not. But you brought it up. (don't worry, I assume you're mathematical skills are good) WSS No, I looked it up. The law isn't quite clear on it. Did you not read the link I posted? I would think, on this board, the problem a lot of times is who I am communicating with. It is like the difference between communication with different people at a company (HR vs Management vs engineers). There are others on here who I seem to be able to communicate with fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 If he's an engineering student, the USA is really fucked. Shocking, but I'm a pretty darn good one too. We must be even more fucked. I would make a comment about you fucking the country over, but you are past that point. You are now just fading into irrelevancy as a new, changing world that is frightening to you takes over. We'll just have to put up with you yelling in the corner over there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 yes, woody is the borg, a devastating, destructive force to earth... in his own mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 Why would I want to be a destructive force? and I don't think your image worked correctly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 You couldn't see it? Works fine for me. It's just Woody, from the cartoon movie Toy Story, with his face fixed like the borg... that's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 Nvm. I am a destructive force I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 No, I looked it up. The law isn't quite clear on it. Did you not read the link I posted? >>>>>>I did. So my statement that you weren't clear on its legality would be perfectly true, if that's what I said. But you can easily look back and see what the question was: are you pro or con? Moral or not? WSS<<<<<<< I would think, on this board, the problem a lot of times is who I am communicating with. It is like the difference between communication with different people at a company (HR vs Management vs engineers). There are others on here who I seem to be able to communicate with fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.