MLD Woody Posted June 30, 2014 Report Share Posted June 30, 2014 this word "denier". stop. just strop. the liberal ideology denies basic math, history, human motivation and even science. just stop the shaming tactic, it makes you look like an emotional woman. (see what i did there?) Uhhhh.... Really? I'm denying math and science? Please then, explain to me where I am doing that. Here I thought I was just referencing a report that showed major inconsistencies and questions about the "2.5 million" number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TXDawg Posted June 30, 2014 Report Share Posted June 30, 2014 We give kids free lunches at school while giving their mom food stamps. And now, we are opening schools in the summer to feed the kids. You're paying for a kid to eat twice. How is that not denying math? entitlement programs without a plan to pay for them is denying math. and conservatives doing to the same, spending without a plan to pay, is the same thing. this is all in the same context of the phrase "global warming deniers". shaming language based on personal beliefs. You deny science because you're pro-life! it's just a hollow attack meant to scare simple-minded people into thinking a certain way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted June 30, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2014 Libs use emotional ploys to get their way, it's how they "feel" the world, instead of thinking about it. Like with immigration and fast and furious - create a crisis so you can use it as an emotional cattle prod type of influence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 We give kids free lunches at school while giving their mom food stamps. And now, we are opening schools in the summer to feed the kids. You're paying for a kid to eat twice. How is that not denying math? entitlement programs without a plan to pay for them is denying math. and conservatives doing to the same, spending without a plan to pay, is the same thing. this is all in the same context of the phrase "global warming deniers". shaming language based on personal beliefs. You deny science because you're pro-life! it's just a hollow attack meant to scare simple-minded people into thinking a certain way. What the hell are you talking about? I don't believe I mentioned any of those things.... We were talking about climate change and you said I was denying math and science. Show me then, where I am denying the math and science on climate change. There are plenty of words to call those that think man made climate change is a hoax, denier is just the easiest I'll also do you the favor of separating your posts from Cals. I wouldn't want you to be associated with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 I find it hilarious when conservatives say that liberals are emotional. Both sides get off on creating boogeymen. Fox News and MSNBC are around just to create fear and fake outrage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 What the hell are you talking about? I don't believe I mentioned any of those things.... We were talking about climate change and you said I was denying math and science. Show me then, where I am denying the math and science on climate change. There are plenty of words to call those that think man made climate change is a hoax, denier is just the easiest I'll also do you the favor of separating your posts from Cals. I wouldn't want you to be associated with that. Actually as much as it bothers you to stray from the subject this appears to be a thread about confiscating guns. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 I'm not talking about the thread, I'm talking about the back and forth TX and I were having. I thought we were on "mmgw", but then he posted like 5 other issues. I don't care about threads straying, this always happens. I'm just trying to figure out what topic he and I were on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 I'm not talking about the thread, I'm talking about the back and forth TX and I were having. I thought we were on "mmgw", but then he posted like 5 other issues. I don't care about threads straying, this always happens. I'm just trying to figure out what topic he and I were on And apparently not very successfully... WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 1, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 Woodpecker seems to read only enough words to be able to figure out some smart ass response, except it usually makes no sense. He's the butt of the board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 Woodpecker seems to read only enough words to be able to figure out some smart ass response, except it usually makes no sense. He's the butt of the board. Insightful. Are you just mad your 2.5 million number wasn't as legit as you u thought it was? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 1, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 Any number isn't as legit nothin. You take take your embarrassing 97% of all scientists and most of us can laugh you off the board now. No wonder Steve is letting you know the truth about your butt of the board MO. These numbers are estimates, sure. Nobody is polling every single American to try to get real numbers, since that wouldn't work anyways - all sorts of folks are annoyed by polls, so they answer funny answers and click on "submit". Too bad, woodypeckerhead, that you don't act like a johnny sissypants cynic about mmgw. You wouldn't look like suck a coward and loser on this board. Okay, I'm gonna go post my last couple of posts again. Thanks for the idea ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 No shit the whole population wasn't asked. Do you know how surveys work? How statistics works? Based on the observation made by the group from my last post, its clear the surgery was flawed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 1, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 Flawed in probably in the eyesight of the beholder. You believe that mmgw is a freakin crisis, and want your liberal agenda wonks to gain more power. So, the iniformation is not flawed, IYSO, but if the information goes against your politics, why, that information is "flawed". You should stfu if you can't avoid making a fool of yourself while trying to make a fool of everybody who doesn't agree with you. There are all sorts of folks around here who disagree with me, a good group of that is probably justified... @@... but you always go on the insult route, and it isn't just with me. You haven't grown up at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 I posted why they were. Did you read my post or the link within it? It will answer many of your questions. I know you must have read it and just forgot though... Since only libs don't read posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 1, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 No, you rationalize, then you say that is why you aren't wrong. Some of us have explained why your 97% is totally bogus several times, but you still bitch that it's true because you want it to be. Really, all you have on this board is bitching at somebody, and putting them down for any opinion that you don't like. Like, Steve disagrees with you, and all of a sudden, he's "pissy". you are the butt of this board, woodpecker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalterWhite Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 MLD Woody wins Internet Activist of the year. He's done so much on the interwebs to promote awareness on social injustices. His effects can be felt all around the community and has had a profound result on Violence, Disease, Famine, War, Terrorism, Poverty, Racism, Suicide, Sexism, Homelessness, Income Inequality, Education. I applaud you brother for using this Browns message board to change the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 Ummmm... Thanks. I hope you've been equally as involved in every single issue you have an opinion on as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 No, you rationalize, then you say that is why you aren't wrong. Some of us have explained why your 97% is totally bogus several times, but you still bitch that it's true because you want it to be. Really, all you have on this board is bitching at somebody, and putting them down for any opinion that you don't like. Like, Steve disagrees with you, and all of a sudden, he's "pissy". you are the butt of this board, woodpecker. I guess I should ask if you understand the concept of hypocrisy as well... What was flawed in the reasoning I posted for why that 2.5 million number is not accurate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 1, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 I never said it was "accurate". Take this example: " Even anti-gun Clinton researchers concede that guns are used 1.5 million times annually for self-defense. According to the Clinton Justice Department, there are as many as 1.5 million cases of self-defense every year. The National Institute of Justice published this figure in 1997 as part of "Guns in America" -- a study which was authored by noted anti-gun criminologists Philip Cook and Jens Ludwig.[5] I clearly stated that the numbers were "all over the place" and used that report as an example. So, even anti-gun Clinton researchers concede that the number is 1.5 million times in self-defense. The only point you have, is on your head, woodpecker. Guns are used many, many times in self-defense, regardless of whether the gun had to be fired or not. I would hope if we ever got mugged by a knife holding thug(s), that my gun drawn would have them backing away and running. That happens a whole lot of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 1, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 Gee, "I guess I should ask you if you know the meaning of rape or not", eh? That is what you do a lot - you childishly pout about something, and can only emotionally respond by flipping it back at somebody. Oh, here's a more serious one: " I suppose we should all ask you if you know what "creativity" means..." Wait for woopeckers childish response - something similar to "I know I am but what are you" foolishness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalterWhite Posted July 2, 2014 Report Share Posted July 2, 2014 Ummmm... Thanks. I hope you've been equally as involved in every single issue you have an opinion on as well You aren't involved in anything. You're a blogger, you don't take any political action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 2, 2014 Report Share Posted July 2, 2014 You aren't involved in anything. You're a blogger, you don't take any political action. So where is the level of involvement where I am allowed to have an opinion and post it? Would any other poster on this board exceed that level of involvement and be allowed to post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 2, 2014 Report Share Posted July 2, 2014 I never said it was "accurate". Oh... Well alright then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 2, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2014 No estimates are "accurate". Go back and read what I was saying, as compared to what you want it to have been said, so you can somehow think you made a point, woodpecker, butt of the board. Your addiction to parsing out bits of sentences so you can take it out of context doesn't help you be respected on the board, or anywhere else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 2, 2014 Report Share Posted July 2, 2014 The methodology was flawed. It wasn't an accurate estimate. Accurate doesn't need to mean exact. As long as you realize that 2.5 mil number is complete BS, then I'm happy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 2, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2014 You'll never be happy, you're a sad, little woodypeckerhead. Yes, all methodologies used in obtaining any estimate that you disagree with, are bad. Nobody with any sense buys your "97%" bs anymore. Say, go look up the way they calc's the tree ring and hockey stick things, and get back to us with your phoney appraisal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 2, 2014 Report Share Posted July 2, 2014 No, not everything I disagree with (though you can't disagree with a number, assume its accurate). Just this particular statistic that I looked in to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 2, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2014 It's apparently the only one you can sissy bitch about eh? All the others, silence. And that, pretty sums up just one way you are definately the butt of this board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 2, 2014 Report Share Posted July 2, 2014 I'm pretty sure I've addressed most others, you just ignore them. So in your head, its silence. I'm still going to have a long reply in the "mmgw" thread. If you want tree rings or whatever to be your next "point", go for it. I just have been very busy the last two days. I should be able to respond after work today though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 2, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2014 how heckish of you. Always an immediate bitch if you can find some "inaccuracy"... but if it calls for a genuine, thoughtful reply, it's always "well, hell, I don't have time, I'm too...eh...busy ! Why, I'll just respond and well.... I'll even elaborate and make sense someday when I... have time." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.