Frenchie Posted August 31, 2014 Report Posted August 31, 2014 I was surprised at the OL cuts and not surprised that they were picked up by other teams - especially Gilkey. It wouldn't surprise me to see him as a regular starter one day and I always thought he played at an NFL level after his rookie year. But I'm even more surprised at the pick-ups on the OL today. So I want to know what you think. Did we upgrade? Any theories as to why cut players failed to impress this staff?
Tour2ma Posted August 31, 2014 Report Posted August 31, 2014 Ah.... JAX claimed him... I thought Gilkey was more effective in a traditional drive-blocking, pull & trap role than a zone-blocking scheme. Apparently JAX disagrees with me...
Frenchie Posted August 31, 2014 Author Report Posted August 31, 2014 I thought the bucks claimed him. But still wondering if we upgraded the OL through all these changes.
TexasAg1969 Posted September 1, 2014 Report Posted September 1, 2014 Was not disappointed to see Wallace gone. His claim to fame was wiffing on Sam and then helping him by piling on Sam and Manziel so he could record .5 sacks for the wrong team.
Guest Posted September 1, 2014 Report Posted September 1, 2014 Was not disappointed to see Wallace gone. His claim to fame was wiffing on Sam and then helping him by piling on Sam and Manziel so he could record .5 sacks for the wrong team. I am glad to see him gone. Zombo
Frenchie Posted September 1, 2014 Author Report Posted September 1, 2014 Any theories on Gilkey? Do you think the fighting had anything to do with it. I was hoping he would become a starter - tremendous size and a mean attitude.
Westside Steve Posted September 2, 2014 Report Posted September 2, 2014 Any theories on Gilkey? Do you think the fighting had anything to do with it. I was hoping he would become a starter - tremendous size and a mean attitude. That's what I thought. WSS
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.