calfoxwc Posted November 22, 2014 Report Share Posted November 22, 2014 Well, there isn't any other reason to include gun ownership into health records. It's all about finding out where they are, so they can take them, or ostracize, fine, intimidate those who own guns. They could manipulate people into losing their jobs, their homes near schools, all sorts of ways to raise their rates, like with medical care... and eventually, cause folks, they think, to get rid of their guns because they can't take anymore. This has been talked about in our U.S..... but this article.... is in the U.K. A socialist bent gov can use gov records to control all aspects of citizens lives. http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/articles/2014/11/the-doctor-is-in-but-privacy-is-out-uk-proposes-adding-gun-ownership-records-to-medical-files.aspx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Fan Posted November 23, 2014 Report Share Posted November 23, 2014 Don't tell your doc you have them. Problem solved. Care to guess the accuracy of my patients' health hx's when they report 1-2 alcoholic beverages/month ? Or that they brush/floss 2x/ day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted November 23, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2014 well, we're talking the UK here, and all private ownership of guns is registered with the gov. Meaning, unless you have an illegal unregistered gun, all they have to do is merge their already existent list of gunowners with the medical records, and there you go, they can start "leaning" on gun owners. Higher rates, higher premiums, maybe loss of jobs, it's hardly far-fetched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.