Chicopee John Posted February 5, 2015 Report Share Posted February 5, 2015 Singer Gary Glitter Convicted of sex crimesA jury in Britain on Thursday found former glam rock singer Gary Glitter guilty of a string of sex abuse offenses against three young girls in the 1970s. The 70-year-old Glitter, whose real name is Paul Gadd, was found guilty of one count of attempted rape, four counts of indecent assault, and one count of sexual intercourse with a girl under the age of 13. "Paul Gadd has shown himself to be a habitual sexual predator who took advantage of the star status afforded to him by targeting young girls who trusted him and were in awe of his fame," Detective Chief Inspector Michael Orchard said. "His lack of remorse and defense that the victims were lying makes his crimes all the more indefensible." Glitter was convicted by a jury of five men and seven women at a London court after a two-week trial. He blew kisses to a public gallery full of reporters as he was remanded in custody. He will be sentenced on Feb. 27. The maximum sentence in Britain for unlawful sex with a minor is life imprisonment. The singer was arrested in October 2012 under Operation Yewtree, the national investigation that police launched in the wake of a child abuse scandal surrounding the late BBC entertainer Jimmy Savile. Glitter's career peaked in the early 1970s. He is best known for "Rock & Roll (Part 2)," a hit in both the United States and Britain. He fell into disgrace after being convicted and imprisoned on child abuse charges in Vietnam. Associated Press Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted February 5, 2015 Report Share Posted February 5, 2015 Besides the money what other would there possibly be to play in a rock and roll band? ☆☆☆ WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted February 5, 2015 Report Share Posted February 5, 2015 In the 1970's? So it took 40 years to press charges? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted February 5, 2015 Report Share Posted February 5, 2015 In Ohio, I believe this kind of prosecution would be barred by the statute of limitations.....which is 20 years. (probably longer than any other kind of crime except murder which has no S/L) http://apps.rainn.org/policy-crime-definitions/index.cfm?state=Ohio&group=7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 This is old news isn't it? I've known Gary glitter was a child molester for years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 In the 1970's? So it took 40 years to press charges? There's been a lot of these types of convictions recently - from musicians to beloved childrens tv presenters to even prince andrew, people seem to be coming out of the woodwork to accuse them for the first time. This is old news isn't it? I've known Gary glitter was a child molester for years. Another conviction. Apparently he may not come out of jail at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 Well he doesn't look like a child molester at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 There's been a lot of these types of convictions recently - from musicians to beloved childrens tv presenters to even prince andrew, people seem to be coming out of the woodwork to accuse them for the first time. Another conviction. Apparently he may not come out of jail at all. So? They have no statute of limitations in the UK for this sort of thing? Over here, fairly universally the S/L on this is the 20 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 So? They have no statute of limitations in the UK for this sort of thing? Over here, fairly universally the S/L on this is the 20 years. Not on sex crimes, apparently. Which I'm not sure is a bad thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.