Marxists always work to change the rules, to consolidate their power

[calfoxwc]

Every...single time.

 

That is after demanding their free speech when they don't have the power.

 

Like the marxist dems in congress going "nuclear option" when they have

control, and then demanding that the republicans NOT EVER consider using

the same.

 

With marxism, which is basically corrupt by virtue of it's alleged utopian intent

that never really works historically, it's all about political narcisistic expediency:

 

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/dems-on-fec-open-to-new-regs-on-donors-internet/article/2560099

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/dems-on-fec-move-to-regulate-internet-campaigns-blogs-drudge/article/2555270

[sadbrownsfan]

So a new problem was noticed last presidential election, and likely will be used more and more in future elections. Part of the problem, the internet does not need to meet the standards of TV in regards to political ads\videos, anyone can put up a video on Youtube or other media source, this can range from "obama girl" to a super PAC endorsed video. Should we allow this to continue? These ads do not need to be fact checked or disclose their donors. Or should we regulate? This could pull in sites that cater to politics all year(ie drudge and other blogs) and force them to make changes.

 

If it was just the average Joe's of the country making political videos and expressing their freedom of speech, I don't think it would be an issue.

[calfoxwc]

It's the timing. Moveon.org, solon, etc etc etc etc...msnbc were all fine with them.

 

Now, they want to ...regulate conservative voices.

 

Note: They went after conservative voices with the IRS.

 

Now, they can "regulate", but this corrupt regime picks and chooses who

actually gets regulated. That is the bigger danger - partisan application of the law.

 

And that is going on throughout this entire Obamao regime.