BrownieMan Posted February 12, 2015 Report Share Posted February 12, 2015 I read about this today, and I would really like the move if we added a rookie in the 3rd or so to go along with it. I really like Shorts and think he would be a very good transition for us. What do you guys think of a Cecil Shorts, Josh Harper type guy, Taylor Gabriel WR core? http://walterfootball.com/freeagents2015rumors.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comeonman Posted February 12, 2015 Report Share Posted February 12, 2015 Another piece, but without Gordon we would still lack a go to number 1. I just don't think Shorts is that guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted February 12, 2015 Report Share Posted February 12, 2015 why not draft a WR? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opal312 Posted February 12, 2015 Report Share Posted February 12, 2015 Cecil Shorts has never played a full season. He can't stay healthy and would be a total waste of cap space. The Browns need to be a running team seeing how our quarterback position is so stellar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LBC mike Posted February 12, 2015 Report Share Posted February 12, 2015 I don't want a bandaid that will come off after a day of wear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicopee John Posted February 12, 2015 Report Share Posted February 12, 2015 I read about this today, and I would really like the move if we added a rookie in the 3rd or so to go along with it. I really like Shorts and think he would be a very good transition for us. What do you guys think of a Cecil Shorts, Josh Harper type guy, Taylor Gabriel WR core? http://walterfootball.com/freeagents2015rumors.php Is there a FA WR or one to draft named Curly to go along with Shorts. I can see it now, "Shorts and Curly" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenew23 Posted February 12, 2015 Report Share Posted February 12, 2015 Another piece, but without Gordon we would still lack a go to number 1. I just don't think Shorts is that guy Who was New England's "go to #1?" Edelman? What about Seattle? Baldwin? Stud #1 receivers have become about as relevant as 3-down RBs. You can find reliable guys anywhere. Shorts CAN be a great piece IF he can stay healthy for a full season... Plus, I like the fact that he's a Cleveland guy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted February 12, 2015 Report Share Posted February 12, 2015 but we already have a roster of 'those' guys. drafting a potential #1 this year will be no doubt IMO a top priority for farmer. not saying farmer wastes a first rounder on one but.......if white's there at 19..........eh??????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudfly Posted February 12, 2015 Report Share Posted February 12, 2015 I'd much rather have shorts than, say, Benji......so Im down with signing him...... but he's not the answer to replacing Gordon or a #1......just a solid upgrade at a position that needs it..... Then....we either draft one high(Parker/White/Beckham) or sign one of the 4 big guns.....Bryant/Holt/Cobb/Thomas....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterDog Posted February 12, 2015 Report Share Posted February 12, 2015 why not draft a WR? +1 The game is different. Last year is a perfect example of how rookie WR can easily translate their college success in the NFL alot early. I rather blow the money on other needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.