calfoxwc Posted March 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 well, Baconpound, what exactly is your problem with those op titles? And, as far as our 2nd Amendment goes, what is your point? That the Founding Fathers saw that serious tyranny occurs when a populace has their arms taken from them? That they knew that it could happen again? Look at frickin history. And, btw, whining about my other threads to cover up for your being out to lunch over the Tea Party is another emotional, irrational knee jerk reaction. And you change subjects at the drop of a hat in a liberal psychological defense mechanism mode. Congrats - you win the "Cal nails it on predicting liberals tendencies" prize ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 Well frankly I'm not a fan of rallies and protests and demonstrations and sit is and that kind of stuff. Still it seems that if any of these are going to get violent or vulgar or unpleasant it's usually by those on the left. Naturally, I suppose, since among the constituent groups of the left you will find more poor, non working, uneducated, criminal and young. Not exclusively of course as I think one constituent group would be labor unions maybe some college professors... But think about it whenever there are car windows being smashed buildings being burned people being beaten up and speakers being shouted down it's usually a younger crowd and almost always left wing. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 It would be pretty funny to see a bunch of 50 year olds holding a protest to keep things the same... Just grab some polls from the Pew Research Center and we can get a better idea of what demos fall where. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 It's just more liberal knee jerk reactions. They will go after anyone running for the nomination on the Rep ticket. It's what they do, emotionally attack. I agree with Cal, I hate how that one side exclusively does that... Also, is "liberal knee jerk reaction" now officially a Cal-ism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 But think about it whenever there are car windows being smashed buildings being burned people being beaten up and speakers being shouted down it's usually a younger crowd and almost always left wing. WSS I think about that if Cleveland should ever win a championship in a major sport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 I agree with Cal, I hate how that one side exclusively does that... Also, is "liberal knee jerk reaction" now officially a Cal-ism? I'll add it to the "Cal Bingo" card. Remind me to send you this week's card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 Also, is "liberal knee jerk reaction" now officially a Cal-ism? Um no woody... https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=knee+jerk+liberal I don't think you even know what a (persons name)-ism is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 I'll add it to the "Cal Bingo" card. Remind me to send you this week's card Last week I won with "wet in Egypt" "liberals... Emotion!" Free Space "woodpeckerhead" General blinding hypocrisy I won a honey glazed ham! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 New rule needed. Everybody's card *must* include "Big Serious Trouble" - you can't win Cal bingo without it, surely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted March 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 "sniff"...I'm so honored. Thank you, thank you. But Woody, don't you ever agree with me on anything ever again, or at least warn me so I can not have my coffee near my keyboard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mohican Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 Cal, you do realize fear is an emotion and you have fearful fits pretty often? (I.E. "big serious trouble") Also, just because someone doesn't want to watch a Fox News style documentary definitely does not make them liberal. Just not a GOP cheerleader. haha Imagine the response to you if you told cal that you didn't think the United States are indivisible, and shouldn't be....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 New rule needed. Everybody's card *must* include "Big Serious Trouble" - you can't win Cal bingo without it, surely? Well damn, that's basically the free space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 I'll add it to the "Cal Bingo" card. Remind me to send you this week's card Send me one also I am surprised this "documentary" is really worth 4 pages..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted March 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 It wasn't due all the whining and bitching, but that's the liberal way. Especially without watching it, which happens all too often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 It wasn't due all the whining and bitching, but that's the liberal way. Especially without watching it, which happens all too often. I watched about half of it.... and its bad, on a scale of 10 to michael moore it was michael moore bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted March 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 So far, your claim is totally without merit. Care to explain one part of it, that you found objectionable? Disagree with the historical perspective? Think that the experts interviewed are liars? Find fault with the history presented? Anything at all to back up your claim? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 So far, your claim is totally without merit. Care to explain one part of it, that you found objectionable? Disagree with the historical perspective? Think that the experts interviewed are liars? Find fault with the history presented? Anything at all to back up your claim? The quick sum of what is wrong with it, is simple, each one his "complaints" about what the US has done in through history(ie push Native Americans off the land, Slavery etc.) to even attempt to give any of them actual a firm basis of argument would take hours for each one to analyze and he somehow covers...well no he doesn't cover\analyze, he basically goes tough shit there was slavery\conquerors elsewhere. He spends more time focusing the narrative on the Left is trying to destroy America than anything actual in depth. Its basically conservative circle jerk that equals moore for the left. Also the title is America imagine the world without her, and yet through the first half of the movie he didn't even try to hypothesize a world without her, he did spend about 10 mins describing how much he loves the US. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted March 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 Still general claims. Give me an example. btw, they were not HIS complaints, he was answering liberal bitching points with indepth information, which right there, offends liberals. They hate history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 Still general claims. Give me an example. btw, they were not HIS complaints, he was answering liberal bitching points with indepth information, which right there, offends liberals. They hate history. He must have seriously went indepth the last 40 mins or so to give justice, because he sure as hell didn't in the first half. You want examples? tough 1. I didn't take notes 2. I spent too much time on this crappy propaganda film and I am not going back to watch it again 3. If you can't see it for yourself, I don't think any amount of proof will change your mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wargograw Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 About the depth of argument I expect from a lib, SBF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 good luck Sad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 I'm genuinely tempted to make 'cal bingo' a thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 I'm genuinely tempted to make 'cal bingo' a thing. I was kind of thinking the same thing, haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted March 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 haha - I will just scramble my terms, you goofballs will never win. go ahead, make my hay. Btw, if it hits the bigtime, you'll owe me big bucks for using me to get rich. Maybe...all of those bucks ! HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA ! have a nice day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 haha - I will just scramble my terms, you goofballs will never win. go ahead, make my hay. Btw, if it hits the bigtime, you'll owe me big bucks for using me to get rich. Maybe...all of those bucks ! HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA ! have a nice day. Hopefully it wouldn't just be us emotional libtards, but others just happy to have a bit of fun as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted March 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 Posted Yesterday, 11:26 PM About the depth of argument I expect from a lib, SBF. war ********************************************************************* Well, they vent emotionally/politically, then they can never back it up logically, and then the feeble excuses start. "Gee, all of a sudden, I'm too busy to justify my emotion rant with logic" "gee, my fiancee gerbil and I are on vacation to see Michael Moore's hut". or "gosh, I just spilled my tall glass of Godiva Pink Sophia Rose wine on my head, and now my psyche is pickled, so I can't justify my emotional rant today"........ And if they do that once too often, they get reminded of what they are doing, and they leave the board and start again somewhere else, like solon or moveonupobamaoleg websites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wargograw Posted April 1, 2015 Report Share Posted April 1, 2015 Cal I love you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 1, 2015 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2015 Now, don't be going overboard, There's still plenty of time for you to disagree with me on stuff. (happily married, bigtime, to my Wonderful Cute Wife) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.