TK39 Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 I have heard (on ESPN I believe) that the Browns management (GM) could be posibility shipping out Quinn or DA and looking for a new QB to lead the team. Is there any truth to this rumor. If that's the case, my Rams will gladly give up their 2nd round this year for Quinn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tobalaz Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 I have heard (on ESPN I believe) that the Browns management (GM) could be posibility shipping out Quinn or DA and looking for a new QB to lead the team. Is there any truth to this rumor. If that's the case, my Rams will gladly give up their 2nd round this year for Quinn. I'd rather take your 2nd in return for Drive Assassin. Quinn is the better fit of the 2 for a ball control/ check down offense. We're keeping Quinn or drafting a new qb. DA is done here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rich4eagle Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 I have heard (on ESPN I believe) that the Browns management (GM) could be posibility shipping out Quinn or DA and looking for a new QB to lead the team. Is there any truth to this rumor. If that's the case, my Rams will gladly give up their 2nd round this year for Quinn. If the new browns mgt is smart which so far their moves indicate.they are shopping both................as DA never won anywhere and had one great year followed el busto...........and Quinn lost every big game he ever played in............... hmmmmmmmmmmmmm........tell me why that either should not be shopped............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gips Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Honestly i wouldnt rule anything out just yet..though i agree bq fits a certain system that mangini may run better..however i wouldnt rule out mangini getting hooked on DA's intoxicating arm strenth and scheming around him either and its obvious mankok is going to build this team from scratch so i wouldnt be suprized if they traded both bq and da either.. You guys have heard me say this before to no avail for the past couple seasons but if mangini is serious about using an offense that attacks opposing teams weaknesses in full then it would make sense to me to be innovative and have a dual qb system this year utilizing both their skills against opponents that are weaker against one or the others abilities while determining who ultimately will be the starter in 2010 if either.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Witness23 Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Interesting..... I'm fine with trading DA but trading Quinn im not sure about. The browns have so many other holes to fill there is no need to take a risk on trading Quinn. I think in the draft we'll be able to pick up players that will be able to take some pressure off of BQ or DA. Maybe drafting a RB(McCoy) and a OT that would help protect him. I think its too early to tell how BQ will end up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK39 Posted March 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 If I were the Browns I would definately NOT trade Brady Quinn. I just noticed in a mock draft (NFL.com) that the Browns are taking a QB in round 1. Why in the world would the Browns do that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plumcrazy73 Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 If we trade Quinn and take anything less then a first rounder I will be pissed. I have no problem with trading them both but I have a problem with giving them away. Either of them for that fact. If the new regime don't like either of them then fine trade them but don't give them away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reno Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Brady's trade value must be a top 20 pick. He has 2 years under his belt and would be ranked higher than any QB if the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OconRecon Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 I have heard (on ESPN I believe) that the Browns management (GM) could be posibility shipping out Quinn or DA and looking for a new QB to lead the team. Is there any truth to this rumor. If that's the case, my Rams will gladly give up their 2nd round this year for Quinn. Smoooooooooooke screeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen. Quinn would be the top ranked QB in the draft hands down. For the Browns, add he's under contract and has had two years in the NFL to get up to speed, and he's not going anywhere. But hey, let's hope these talking heads keep chatting it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lumbergh Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Quinn would be the top ranked QB in the draft hands down. Haha, no he wouldn't. Quinn-love is a function of homosexuality, homerism, and Notre Dame's TV contract with NBC. 2 of his last 3 passes were picked off before he got benched. And Charlie Frye throws a better deep ball. No NFL exec would rate BQ anywhere near the top of this draft. And nobody will offer high picks in trade either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. T Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Haha, no he wouldn't. Quinn-love is a function of homosexuality, homerism, and Notre Dame's TV contract with NBC. 2 of his last 3 passes were picked off before he got benched. And Charlie Frye throws a better deep ball. No NFL exec would rate BQ anywhere near the top of this draft. And nobody will offer high picks in trade either. I see your smokin crack again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OconRecon Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Haha, no he wouldn't. Quinn-love is a function of homosexuality, homerism, and Notre Dame's TV contract with NBC. 2 of his last 3 passes were picked off before he got benched. And Charlie Frye throws a better deep ball. No NFL exec would rate BQ anywhere near the top of this draft. And nobody will offer high picks in trade either. Maybe you're right. Sanchez has all of those years at a big time school, listens to advice from the head coach, was a Heisman finalist, set a ton of records, and resurrected a program which was years in the tank before he arrived. With 4 years of starting under his belt, he has the experience thought to be more important for QB's than any other position in order to achieve NFL success. Oh wait, that's Quinn's story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBrownsFan Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 ..........and Quinn lost every big game he ever played in............... Hey, resident Retard, how about going back and researching how many points the Notre Shame defense gave up in those games? Naww, that would make your argument weak, just like every other bullshit rant and post you put on this board. I hear Jim Jones calling you from his grave... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTBH Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 And in college how many big games did Peyton Manning win? You'll have to forgive our friend Rich4Men... his analytical skills only go as far as looking at the standings and claiming all the administration, coaches, and players of the winning teams are amazing, and all the administration, coaches, and players on the losing teams are garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5150k9 Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 I have heard (on ESPN I believe) that the Browns management (GM) could be posibility shipping out Quinn or DA and looking for a new QB to lead the team. Is there any truth to this rumor. If that's the case, my Rams will gladly give up their 2nd round this year for Quinn. The key question is.....Why would we ship a qb (either 1) for a new qb to lead this team. There isn't 1 out there in the draft that shows he is better then either of them. BQ still has upside, we have seen what DA' s upside is "there isn't one"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
why cant we win Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 I would like the link for where on nfl.com that they a mock has the browns drafting a qb in the 1st round Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damajuki Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Sure they are. EVERYONE is available, as far as ManKok is concerned, FOR THE RIGHT PRICE. Which is as it should be. If some team rings up and says "hey, we'll give you our 1st and 2nd next year for Quinn", you don't think ManKok would take that, or at least ponder it? Of course they would. And they should. But being AVAILABLE, doesn't mean they WILL get traded. It's ManKok's way of sending the message "we're looking for picks, we're going to be players on draft day, come talk to us." It's just signaling that we are in all out "sell" mode so if you call be ready to give up some picks. I like it. I want another second rounder this year, one way or another. I would like to see us bring in 4 Day One talents in this talent-rich draft and let's just watch things come together on the field. I'd much rather watch a young, talented team get pounded than the old, over-the-hill teams we've been watching get pounded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEraDawg Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 The last thing anyone should do is get mad over what they "hear" at this time of the year . Most of it is misinformation , or subterfuge , designed to confuse off season moves. Year in and year out it happens but people fall for it . Fans I mean . I doubt personnel people in the NFL even pay attention to half of it . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eggo31 Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Haha, no he wouldn't. Quinn-love is a function of homosexuality, homerism, and Notre Dame's TV contract with NBC. 2 of his last 3 passes were picked off before he got benched. And Charlie Frye throws a better deep ball. No NFL exec would rate BQ anywhere near the top of this draft. And nobody will offer high picks in trade either. you really are an idiot arent you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan Of STEEL 1 Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 The Browns may want to trade Anderson, but who has been knocking on that door? There are many QBs out there and I don't see the Browns getting much for him. Quinn has more upside and potential than Anderson. Personally, I don't think the browns should worry about QB but should build on the offensive and defensive lines. That is where a team is built. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldcrow1945 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 The Browns may want to trade Anderson, but who has been knocking on that door? There are many QBs out there and I don't see the Browns getting much for him. Quinn has more upside and potential than Anderson. Personally, I don't think the browns should worry about QB but should build on the offensive and defensive lines. That is where a team is built. I agree. The thing that amazes me about the Steelers O-line is where they were drafted. None of them were high draft picks. It really emphasizes the need to be productive throughout the entire draft. We as fans like to concentrate on Rounds 1 and 2, But the key to success is getting those good players in rounds 3, 4 and 5 as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tobalaz Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 The difference between a good franchise and us, I mean a bad one, is the ability to develop later round picks. Honestly if we were winning the last few season would we be bitching about developmental guys like Hubbard because they can't contribute right now or would we be glad to have an athlete like that given the time he needs to learn the game? Remember the kid has less than 2 college seasons under his belt and was drafted raw knowing he'd need a lot of work. Really though, how many of our late rounder might have turned out as solid guys with time on the pine to get up to speed and polish tecniques if we already had more than just a handful of quality starters? Part of it is the drafting, part is the coaching, part is having time to teach these kids. That's why a franchise like the Steelers can produce those late round steals we never seem to find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AdaM Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Yes I am on the Falco bandwagon .... Edie Falco? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.