jbluhm86 Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/01/26/wounded-warrior-project-reportedly-accused-wasting-donor-money.html What an absolute disgrace, if true. But, in the end, it will be our vets who pay the price as people will be less likely to donate to WWP now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 I thought it was pretty well known that they use a ton of the donations for operating fees and upper brass pay at Wounded Warrior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicopee John Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 I thought it was pretty well known that they use a ton of the donations for operating fees and upper brass pay at Wounded Warrior. For 1, I didn't know that. If true, I will find a way to donate via local charities, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 This comes from Fox news after Trump announces he's skipping the debate to do a fundraiser for our wounded warriors. Hmm....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 This comes from Fox news after Trump announces he's skipping the debate to do a fundraiser for our wounded warriors. Hmm....... I saw this yesterday on CBS national news. it is a story that needs to be reported on if a charitable organization is wasting too much money that should be going to those in need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 all charities do this folks. Charities are just slush funds for people that couldn't figure out how to run a real business. This is why I never give shit to any of them. I know better. You're lucky if 10 cents out of every dollar goes to the intended cause. Running a charity shouldn't be done free of charge, but it wasn't meant to make the people stinking rich...which a lot of them are. I have no issue with paying people who run a competent non profit well, but they're expenses and salaries need to be transparent as fuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 all charities do this folks. Charities are just slush funds for people that couldn't figure out how to run a real business. This is why I never give shit to any of them. I know better. You're lucky if 10 cents out of every dollar goes to the intended cause. Running a charity shouldn't be done free of charge, but it wasn't meant to make the people stinking rich...which a lot of them are. I have no issue with paying people who run a competent non profit well, but they're expenses and salaries need to be transparent as fuck. Charities need to pay salaries as well. Of course not everything you donate goes on the cause. That being said, the good ones are giving around 80-90% of the money raised to the relevant research or whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 That being said, the good ones are giving around 80-90% of the money raised to the relevant research or whatever. You are pure as the driven snow if you believe any charity gets 80-90% of the money it collects to it's intended cause. I would love that to be true of course. I just don't believe it for one flaming ass hair of a second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 You are pure as the driven snow if you believe any charity gets 80-90% of the money it collects to it's intended cause. I would love that to be true of course. I just don't believe it for one flaming ass hair of a second. I've worked with charities? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 The CEO of Wounded Warriors makes $375,000 a year. Seems a bit steep to me. About 60 percent of monies collected actually go to wounded veterans with 40 percent going for operating costs. Too high for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 The CEO of Wounded Warriors makes $375,000 a year. Seems a bit steep to me. About 60 percent of monies collected actually go to wounded veterans with 40 percent going for operating costs. Too high for me. That does seem a bit steep, but you have to remember that some of these charities are as big as many national and international corporations, and running them is no easier than running a for-profit business. You still need to find people with the ability to do so, and that means you have to pay the going rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 That does seem a bit steep, but you have to remember that some of these charities are as big as many national and international corporations, and running them is no easier than running a for-profit business. You still need to find people with the ability to do so, and that means you have to pay the going rate. I don't disagree but think they can do a little better in getting more aid to the vets and less on operating costs. Charity Navigator didn't rate them all that bad but I still think they can improve IMO. http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=12842#.VqkBdE-N4SU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 I've worked with charities? well if you have different experiences than I than so be it. I'm a jaded fuck full disclosure. I assume the absolute worst of humans. I have no experience with large multi national charities but I do with local 501's, and I see no reason to believe that large charities operate vastly different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 well if you have different experiences than I than so be it. I'm a jaded fuck full disclosure. I assume the absolute worst of humans. I have no experience with large multi national charities but I do with local 501's, and I see no reason to believe that large charities operate vastly different. The one in particular that I work with is not huge, but exists in many countries around the world. Money raised goes on the general 'charity' aspect of it, but a lot also goes on admin costs (including wages). It pays shit though. Compare to things like cancer research, most of that money actually goes to funding the research, but that could also mean paying the wages of the lab techs, the researchers, the head scientists, the science 'strategists' and things like that all the way up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 Hey boys, just a little heads up. Donald Trump Support the wounded warriors initiative. Does that help you understand why the investigation and the smear campaign? Think really hard. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 Hey boys, just a little heads up. Donald Trump Support the wounded warriors initiative. Does that help you understand why the investigation and the smear campaign? Think really hard. WSS Does any politician not support the Wounded Warriors Project? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 Does any politician not support the Wounded Warriors Project? Well I did hear that his counter debate tactic would donate the proceeds to the Wounded Warrior Foundation. So I'm not surprised that someone did some digging and found some dirt. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 Well I did hear that his counter debate tactic would donate the proceeds to the Wounded Warrior Foundation. So I'm not surprised that someone did some digging and found some dirt. WSS You mean Fox News would publish a story to protect their financial interest in a political debate. Oh gosh no, Fox News does everything right the way a good god-fearing conservative christian would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted January 28, 2016 Report Share Posted January 28, 2016 whoa now, are we impugning Fox's honor? So now that the snake is eating it's own tail it's bullshit? Welcome to the early 2000's when most of us had already disseminated that FOX was a bunch of scumbags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 28, 2016 Report Share Posted January 28, 2016 Yes, Rachel Maddow Chris Matthews al Sharpton and Ed Schultz impugning and defending Fox News honor. Pretty funny boys. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.