recadna Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 to have Coleman? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 to have Coleman? Yes they only got Coleman and none of the extra picks. Just Coleman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
htownbrown Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 To have Coleman and a bunch of picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furious Styles Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 to have Coleman?Basically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcam222 Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 Kind of skipping over the cornucopia of picks we have accumulated huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opal312 Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 So much for "Money Ball Analytics" We passed on Taylor Decker, Paxton Lynch, for a shrimp like Benjamin! We could have had Michael Thomas at 32! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 Kind of skipping over the cornucopia of picks we have accumulated huh? Doesn't fit the narrative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyin J Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 and the 7 other players we'll get out of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 No matter who we drafted, there'd always be people bitching about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 So much for "Money Ball Analytics" We passed on Taylor Decker, Paxton Lynch, for a shrimp like Benjamin! We could have had Michael Thomas at 32! Benjamin was a slot at best and wanted too much money. Coleman is the same size as Antonio Brown and has blazing speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opal312 Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 They could have stayed at #2 and taken Elliot, then Thomas at 32 and I bet the results would be better than all those draft picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 They could have stayed at #2 and taken Elliot... I will let this lay right here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcam222 Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 Benjamin was a slot at best and wanted too much money. Coleman is the same size as Antonio Brown and has blazing speed. Absolutely, just told son this guy is our Antonio Brown. Beyond that they have managed pick acquisition masterfully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 I don't really like it, but it depends idk. I didn't have a strong preference at 15 but I liked Ragland or Treadwell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
recadna Posted April 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 I know we got many FUTURE picks. None of the picks would win any games for us in the near future. Sometimes you got to start to select real impact players and try to win some games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 I know we got many FUTURE picks. None of the picks would win any games for us in the near future. Sometimes you got to start to select real impact players and try to win some games. The team sucks and requires a huge infusion of talent. Not just one or two players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Bone Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 2015 Biletnikoff award winner (best WR in college football) the #1 WR on many "draft guru's" board, a nasty player, and a position of desperate need, and yet that's not good enough for some of us???????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5150k9 Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 to have Coleman? Please put down the keyboard, eat the spaghetti O's your mother heated up for you and brought down to the basement. He's not benjamin, he's more like Antonio Brown and you obviously forgot about the extra picks that we got that will help this team. But wallow in your Tidy Whiteys all alone with all that knowledge you seem to think you have as a NFL GM. This team needs draft picks to build on, not just 1 pick. Nuff Said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opal312 Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 There were other wide receivers we could get in round two who are bigger and better. I thought at least we'd get Noah Spence out of the draft. Man oh man it's going to be a long 24 hours waiting for round 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cambridgeho Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 Coleman is the 1st or 2 wrs we take. We need a Burner at Wr AND WE GOT IT AT 15! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 There were other wide receivers we could get in round two who are bigger and better. I thought at least we'd get Noah Spence out of the draft. Man oh man it's going to be a long 24 hours waiting for round 2. Do you actually know any players outside of Ohio State? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 I know we got many FUTURE picks. None of the picks would win any games for us in the near future. Sometimes you got to start to select real impact players and try to win some games. Not this year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Make-Believe Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 So the Browns traded their #2 Overall and gained: Corey Coleman #76 overall 2016 #77 overall 2016 #100 overall 2016 The Eagles' First Round Pick 2017 The Titans' Second Round Pick 2017 The Eagles' Second Round Pick 2018 Or an entire extra draft worth of picks over the next three seasons. That seems like a pretty good haul to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 Yes, don't take one GOOD player, take a bunch of shit that winds up on the cutting room floor. Fucking losers. Well if you hate it then it must be the best idea, Corky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Bone Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 2015 Biletnikoff award winner (best WR in college football) the #1 WR on many "draft guru's" board, a nasty player, and a position of desperate need, and yet that's not good enough for some of us???????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5150k9 Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 Yes, don't take one GOOD player, take a bunch of shit that winds up on the cutting room floor. Fucking losers We did take a good player, but if you didn't want to F'n Bitch ALL the time, you would pull your head out of your ass and see that. Look at Colemen's tape and read the experts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5150k9 Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 With 5 of them taken already? You don't have to know anyone else beside Ohio State Players. Ding Ding Ding There you have it. your limited answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkside5 Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 Common sense has finally arrived in the first round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbluhm86 Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 He's 5' 10". With no QB and no other players he will be double teamed and shut down easily. Too short. Waste of a pick. #2 at the start and you get THIS SHIT? It is like having a ticket for a date with Selma Hayek and having Whoopie Goldberg show up. Selma Hayek now, or Selma Hayek in "Dusk till Dawn"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 29, 2016 Report Share Posted April 29, 2016 Yes, 7 of the ugliest women at the dance. The ones nobody wanted anyway. Idiot organization. You could always go follow another team. I am sure another forum is in desperate need of a whiny troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.