bbedward Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 https://youtube.com/watch?v=nO7GAbBoIF0 This is giving me a big freedom boner Trashing the TPP, trashing NAFTA, trashing Iraq, trashing Libya - "America First" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Post Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 Yep some people standing around, really fires me up too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 Trump is perfectly pulling at Ed's heart strings. He's gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted June 8, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 Yep some people standing around, really fires me up too. I updated the video link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaporTrail Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 Man. I can't wait for these debates. They're going to be fantastic. Two of the most hated candidates ever. Slinging shit at each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted June 8, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 The Trump dynasty is about to begin. Feel fortunate to be living during this historic time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 It's almost laugh-out-loud funny that now the left-leaning media, which is just about everybody, is attacking Trump for making a pre-written speech. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 It's almost laugh-out-loud funny that now the left-leaning media, which is just about everybody, is attacking Trump for making a pre-written speech. WSS Barack Obama never uses a teleprompter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 It's almost laugh-out-loud funny that now the left-leaning media, which is just about everybody, is attacking Trump for making a pre-written speech. WSS They will be grabbing on to anything they can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted June 8, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 When Obama's teleprompter breaks he becomes a babbling mess People criticize Trump for going off the script (the only candidate who does so), and they criticize him for going on the script. He can't win. I like how CNN had it plastered everywhere yesterday about Clinton being the first woman nominee and how amazing and historic it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted June 8, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 On another note, Trump is giving a speech Monday that's focused around Clinton -- The Clinton’s have turned the politics of personal enrichment into an art form for themselves.They’ve made hundreds of millions of dollars selling access, selling favors, selling government contracts. And I mean hundreds of millions of dollars… I am going to give a major speech probably Monday of next week. And we are going to be discussing all of the things that have taken place with the Clintons. I think you’re going to find it very informative and very, very interesting. I wonder if the press will want to attend? It'll be popcorn worthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 Donald J. Trump 17 hrs · STATEMENT REGARDING TRUMP UNIVERSITY It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage. I am friends with and employ thousands of people of Mexican and Hispanic descent. The American justice system relies on fair and impartial judges. All judges should be held to that standard. I do not feel that one’s heritage makes them incapable of being impartial, but, based on the rulings that I have received in the Trump University civil case, I feel justified in questioning whether I am receiving a fair trial. Over the past few weeks, I have watched as the media has reported one inaccuracy after another concerning the ongoing litigation involving Trump University. There are several important facts the public should know and that the media has failed to report. Throughout the litigation my attorneys have continually demonstrated that students who participated in Trump University were provided a substantive, valuable education based upon a curriculum developed by professors from Northwestern University, Columbia Business School, Stanford University and other respected institutions. And, the response from students was overwhelming. Over a five year period, more than 10,000 paying students filled out surveys giving the courses high marks and expressing their overwhelming satisfaction with Trump University’s programs. For example: Former student Tarla Makaeff, the original plaintiff in the litigation, not only completed multiple surveys rating Trump University’s three-day seminar “excellent” in every category, but also praised Trump University’s mentorship program in a glowing 5 plus minute video testimonial. When asked “how could Trump University help to meet [her] goals”, she simply stated “[c]ontinue to offer great classes.” Once the plaintiffs’ lawyers realized how disastrous a witness she was, they asked to have her removed from the case. Over my lawyers’ objections, the judge granted the plaintiffs’ motion, but allowed the case to continue. Art Cohen, a lead plaintiffs in the litigation, completed a survey in which he not only rated Trump University’s three-day seminar “excellent” in virtually every category, but went so far as to indicate that he would “attend another Trump University seminar” and even “recommend Trump University seminars to a friend.” When asked how Trump University could improve the seminar, Mr. Cohen’s only suggestion was to “[h]ave lunch sandwiches brought in” and make the lunch break 45 minutes. Former student Bob Giullo, who has been critical of Trump University in numerous interviews and negative advertisements from my political opponents, also expressed his satisfaction, rating Trump University’s programs “excellent” in every category. When asked how Trump University could improve its programs, Mr. Giullo simply asked that students be provided “more comfortable chairs.” Indeed, these are just a few of literally thousands of positive surveys, all of which can be viewed online at www.98percentapproval.com. For those students who decided that Trump University’s programs were not for them, the company had a generous refund policy, offering a full refund to any student who asked for their money back within 3 days of signing up for a program or by the end of the first day of any multi-day program, whichever came later. Normally, legal issues in a civil case would be heard in a neutral environment. However, given my unique circumstances as nominee of the Republican Party and the core issues of my campaign that focus on illegal immigration, jobs and unfair trade, I have concerns as to my ability to receive a fair trial. I am fighting hard to bring jobs back to the United States. Many companies – like Ford, General Motors, Nabisco, Carrier – are moving production to Mexico. Drugs and illegal immigrants are also pouring across our border. This is bad for all Americans, regardless of their heritage. Due to what I believe are unfair and mistaken rulings in this case and the Judge’s reported associations with certain professional organizations, questions were raised regarding the Obama appointed Judge’s impartiality. It is a fair question. I hope it is not the case. While this lawsuit should have been dismissed, it is now scheduled for trial in November. I do not intend to comment on this matter any further. With all of the thousands of people who have given the courses such high marks and accolades, we will win this case! Donald J. Trump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/us/15judge.html?_r=0 A Judge’s View of Judging Is on the Record By CHARLIE SAVAGE MAY 14, 2009 WASHINGTON — In 2001, Sonia Sotomayor, an appeals court judge, gave a speech declaring that the ethnicity and sex of a judge “may and will make a difference in our judging.” In her speech, Judge Sotomayor questioned the famous notion — often invoked by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and her retired Supreme Courtcolleague, Sandra Day O’Connor — that a wise old man and a wise old woman would reach the same conclusion when deciding cases. “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life,” said Judge Sotomayor, who is now considered to be near the top of President Obama’s list of potential Supreme Court nominees. Her remarks, at the annual Judge Mario G. Olmos Law and Cultural Diversity Lecture at the University of California, Berkeley, were not the only instance in which she has publicly described her view of judging in terms that could provoke sharp questioning in a confirmation hearing. This month, for example, a video surfaced of Judge Sotomayor asserting in 2005 that a “court of appeals is where policy is made.” She then immediately adds: “And I know — I know this is on tape, and I should never say that because we don’t make law. I know. O.K. I know. I’m not promoting it. I’m not advocating it. I’m — you know.” The video was of a panel discussion for law students interested in becoming clerks, and she was explaining the different experiences gained when working at district courts and appeals courts. Her remarks caught the eye ofconservative bloggers who accused her of being a “judicial activist,” although Jonathan H. Adler, a professor at Case Western Reserve University law school, argued that critics were reading far too much into those remarks. Republicans have signaled that they intend to put the eventual nominee under a microscope, and they say they were put on guard by Mr. Obama’s statement that judges should have “empathy,” a word they suggest could be code for injecting liberal ideology into the law. Judge Sotomayor has given several speeches about the importance of diversity. But her 2001 remarks at Berkeley, which were published by the Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, went further, asserting that judges’ identities will affect legal outcomes. “Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences,” she said, for jurists who are women and nonwhite, “our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging.” Her remarks came in the context of reflecting her own life experiences as a Hispanic female judge and on how the increasing diversity on the federal bench “will have an effect on the development of the law and on judging.” In making her argument, Judge Sotomayor sounded many cautionary notes. She said there was no uniform perspective that all women or members of a minority group have, and emphasized that she was not talking about any individual case. She also noted that the Supreme Court was uniformly white and male when it delivered historic rulings against racial and sexual discrimination. And she said she tried to question her own “opinions, sympathies and prejudices,” and aspired to impartiality. Still, Judge Sotomayor questioned whether achieving impartiality “is possible in all, or even, in most, cases.” She added, “And I wonder whether by ignoring our differences as women or men of color we do a disservice both to the law and society.” She also approvingly quoted several law professors who said that “to judge is an exercise of power” and that “there is no objective stance but only a series of perspectives.” “Personal experiences affect the facts that judges choose to see,” she said. Charles J. Ogletree Jr., a Harvard law professor and an adviser to Mr. Obama, said Judge Sotomayor’s remarks were appropriate. Professor Ogletree said it was “obvious that people’s life experiences will inform their judgments in life as lawyers and judges” because law is more than “a technical exercise,” citing Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s famousaphorism: “The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience.” In a forward to a 2007 book, “The International Judge” (U.P.N.E.), Judge Sotomayor seemed to put a greater emphasis on a need for judges to seek to transcend their identities, writing that “all judges have cases that touch our passions deeply, but we all struggle constantly with remaining impartial” and letting reason rule. Courts, she added, “are in large part the product of their membership and their judges’ ability to think through and across their own intellectual and professional backgrounds” to find common ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 Per her dishonesty, of course Trump is exactly correct to question the la raza judge being the judge in his case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 He better bring it with his clinton speech. If he doesnt hsve shit and its just an hour of "hillary's got poopy pants she's got poop in her pants.....poopy psnts!!!" If its along those lines i will vote for her to spite him when i was just gonna sit this clown show out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted June 8, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 He better bring it with his clinton speech. If he doesnt hsve shit and its just an hour of "hillary's got poopy pants she's got poop in her pants.....poopy psnts!!!" If its along those lines i will vote for her to spite him when i was just gonna sit this clown show out. He's referenced her clinton foundation donations from the Saudi government and subsequent weapons deals from her state department, among many other fraudulent things. It'll be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 He's referenced her clinton foundation donations from the Saudi government and subsequent weapons deals from her state department, among many other fraudulent things. It'll be good. Well he had to show some proof of something untoward. Saudi is an ally for some reason and gets weapons deals all the time. It aint norhin new. We've always given weapons to the pieces of shit that we helped into power Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted June 10, 2016 Report Share Posted June 10, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.