calfoxwc Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 https://www.yahoo.com/news/nervous-baltics-war-footing-nato-tries-deter-russia-070308435.html?ref=gs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted June 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 I believe russia will start something -really- diabolical while this coward is in our WH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 I believe russia will start something -really- diabolical while this coward is in our WH. Well they're running out of time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted June 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 thank you for commenting on the content. Yes, they are, they have a half of a year left... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 We could also look back at all of the other terrible things that were going to happen with Obama as president... Only 6 more months to ban all guns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 Dont pick up too many challenge flags cal, we still have our bet on whether he imposes martial law and stays as president Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted June 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 we have no bet on that, the chances of that are remote, but the serious trouble is closer and closer, and you know that all of liberal land would be OUTRAGED that another terrorist act happens on our shores..... if it were a republican president. and woody, we've already posted obamao and higgardly referring to Australia as the model. Australia banned all guns, and confiscated them. just think about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 no i think we have a bet. Anyway back to these rooskies. So cal do you pay attention to the news? Cause nato is doing its largest wargames ever within spitting distance of russia http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/US-led-NATO-War-Games-Anger-Russia-20160611-0034.html Did you catch the title "U.S" led? So what exactly is the obama admin doing thats weak? Cause rigjt now, its doing something no rep president has done for decades. Possibly not even under reagan was a wargame like this. They also sailed a warship into the black sea. Thats like a russian warship entering the gulf snd putzing around, you're getting all this right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted June 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 A. Search Results Russian Navy Armada Ordered To Coast Of Texas For “Liberation ... www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1881.htm Jun 25, 2015 - Russian Navy Armada Ordered To Coast Of Texas For “Liberation Exercise ... Fleet naval forces to immediately embark to the Gulf of Mexico for ... What Are Russians Doing Off The Coast Of Florida? | GOVERNMENT ... www.govtslaves.info/russians-coast-florida/ While some mock the Russians for always deploying tugs with their Navy, I've ... why have the Russians parked their premier Northern Fleet naval tug off the coast ...Russian subs almost certainly know as much about the gulf of Mexico as our ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted June 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 B. Ben Hodges, the commander of the U.S. army in Europe, visited Vilnius last week. He echoed Baltic concerns about the strength of NATO's deterrence. "It is a transition," Hodges said. "I hope that includes serious war fighting capabilities. Just putting garrisons of troops sitting in the countries ... will not deter." Russia insists it poses no threat to the former Soviet states. Top NATO officials say talk of an impending attack is misleading, a view shared by Paris and Berlin. Russia has held unannounced exercises on the borders of the Baltics, including one in 2014 which mustered 100,000 troops, according to Danish Colonel Jakob Sogard Larsen, who heads the new NATO command outpost in Lithuania. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted June 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 so, soviet ships roam our shores.... and, Ben Hodges, commander of U.S. Army in Europe, says our NATO deterrence is not strong. weak leadership by obamao. he IS the .."so-called" American president. in 2014, russia mustered 100,000 troops in their exercise. Now, which is more............. 100,000...... or.............. 4000. Take your time. Use a calculator or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 Except its not 4000. Color me unsurprised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted June 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 straight from the article: "NATO defense ministers are set to agree this week on a new multinational force of 4,000 troops for the Baltics and Poland." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 I was talking about the wargames cal. What are you referencing? Cause the nato wargames going on now has alot more than 4000 troops involved. Obama also sent a carrier to the med. So how do these actions convey to russia that the u.s idnt serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 If anything bringing in formerly neutral buffer countries is provocative. Obama might be doing too much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted June 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 I'm referencing the 4000 troop force for the Baltics that is supposed to be a deterrent to 100,000 russian troops "exercising" on the border (Ukraine history noted here), and then all of a sudden moving in. The other Baltic folks are worried as hell that it isn't enough, not large enough. The Commander of the Army in Europe says so. that is the point. should I repeat it a dozen times before you take notice? The other Baltic folks are worried as hell that it isn't enough, not large enough. The Commander of the Army in Europe says so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 anf you think trump is gonna put more troops in europe? The guy who suggested some of these countries can and should fend for thrmselves......really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted June 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 no, he said if they won't pay their fair share of the cost, they can fend for themselves... you and obamao are allllll about "fair share", right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 He wants other nato countries to do the heavy lifting. Nothing about fair share. http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/720165 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 For the record though, everything he said in that article i agree with. I just think you have a fundsmental misunderstanding of his position. He thinks along the lines of the Pauls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 As ive said to ed, if he wasnt such a flaming dbag i would have already voted for him. Hillary pisses me off more with every passing day. And obama's slowly creeping on my nerves too with this constant fgtry regarding not being able to critisize extreme islam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted June 14, 2016 Report Share Posted June 14, 2016 He wants other nato countries to do the heavy lifting. Nothing about fair share. http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/720165Not the heavy lifting, he complains because we do the heavy lifting. Only a handful of our NATO allies pay the required 2% GDP on defense spending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.