cane666 Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 bring on CURRY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YtownBrownsBacker Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 bring on CURRY Very likely. Rumors are that KC likes Raji a whole lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YtownBrownsBacker Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 If we get Curry I will be completely happy... but we still need WR's... I like Crabtree alot. Im glad Im not the ManKok I like Crabtree too and would draft him unless Curry falls. My feeling is except for Curry there isn't that big of a difference for the money between Oakpo/Brown at #5 or English/Barwin/Sintim or others at #36. There is a real big difference between Crabtree/Maclin and who you can get at #36. I would think it might be where you feel the greatest value picks would be. I don't think I would pass on Curry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sez.EJ Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 bring on CURRY Every man needs a dream.. but don't hold on to that one too tight. It will take more than the signing of that dinasaur to allow curry to fall to us. Curry may be the best player in the draft.. Some teams will pick BPA no matter what they actually need. There isn't a team in the league that looks at their linebacking corps and says.. We don't need him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldcrow1945 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 bring on CURRY Where are you guys getting this? The chiefs are moving to the 3-4 so they have to collect as many LB's as possible. Secondly and even more importantly, Thomas plays inside and Curry is projected as an OLB. That signing has zero effect on the Chiefs draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClevelandFanForLife Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Where are you guys getting this? The chiefs are moving to the 3-4 so they have to collect as many LB's as possible. Secondly and even more importantly, Thomas plays inside and Curry is projected as an OLB. That signing has zero effect on the Chiefs draft. also they are going to want a guy like thomas to be a mentor for curry. face it guys, curry is gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riffer X Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 I don't assume anything anymore. The time Edge James went before "Sticky Bud" Ricky Williams I about shit my pants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KardiacKid26 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 KC would have a beastly linebacking core with Derrick Johnson, Zach Thomas, Mike Vrabel and Aaron Curry. There secondary is in pretty good shape with the two Brandon's at Cornerback and their D-Line has Tambi Hali and Glenn Dorsey. Not bad of a defense maybe Top 20 for '09 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YtownBrownsBacker Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 KC would have a beastly linebacking core with Derrick Johnson, Zach Thomas, Mike Vrabel and Aaron Curry. There secondary is in pretty good shape with the two Brandon's at Cornerback and their D-Line has Tambi Hali and Glenn Dorsey. Not bad of a defense maybe Top 20 for '09 Even before signing Thomas KC has been rumored to have been very very interested in Raji. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldcrow1945 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Even before signing Thomas KC has been rumored to have been very very interested in Raji. I wouldn't think they'd be interested in Raji. Tank Tyler played the Nose for N.C. State and all indications are that he'll be the nose for the Chiefs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.