next2nothing Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Just heard on NFL Network from Mike Mayock that the Jets are trying hard as hell to get up to #2 for Sanchez. Wish there was more but they just touched on it. We'll see in an hour how it plays out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OconRecon Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Clearly he's the pretty girl at the dance and many seem to have a rumor their team is gunning for him. This is going to be fun. But why does the little voice in my head say we'll have a farily straight forward draft. And maybe that's OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mz. Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Clearly he's the pretty girl at the dance and many seem to have a rumor their team is gunning for him. I don't know if he's the "pretty girl," but he's definitely the one who's rumored to put out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
next2nothing Posted April 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Clearly he's the pretty girl at the dance and many seem to have a rumor their team is gunning for him. This is going to be fun. But why does the little voice in my head say we'll have a farily straight forward draft. And maybe that's OK. I agree that there seems to be everyone and anyone trying to pick up Sanchez, but I think this latest rumor has pretty good legs seeing as how the Jets need a QB badly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl34 Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Agreed. No one can equate Josh Freeman with Mark Sanchez...and the Jets won't make that mistake. On the other hand, I find this interesting because perhaps Mangini sold everyone on the idea that he wants Sanchez badly so that the Jets would give up the farm (and take a big risk in doing so) to jump ahead. Payback's a b***h Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.