damajuki Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 So far, so good. What we're seeing so far is a strong indication we will be run first, pass second. Robiskie is a young JJ. Love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H Pac Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 What we're seeing so far is a strong indication we will be run first, pass second. And we're going to continue to not be able to stop the run, and not be able to put pressure on the passer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBrownsFan Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 So far, so good. What we're seeing so far is a strong indication we will be run first, pass second. Robiskie is a young JJ. Love it. This pick has me perplexed a little.... umm.. our defense STILL sucks?? And Robiskie? We feeling sorry for his dad's tenure here or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 So far, so good. What we're seeing so far is a strong indication we will be run first, pass second. Robiskie is a young JJ. Love it. I agree Juki....I like the pick....a reliable receiver. A solid safe pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTBH Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Robiskie is a young JJ. No he isn't, he's a speedster. All Ohio State players are speedsters and heaven forbid you ever compare any of them to a slower player like JJ. Ye must be shunned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naptimeyeller Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 We really need a lb bad, not sure wr should rank above lb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NebBrownsFan Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 We really need a lb bad, not sure wr should rank above lb. Who else is there besides BE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 I agree Juki....I like the pick....a reliable receiver. A solid safe pick Loving this draft so far. WR was our thinnest position. A+ so far... Don't forget the players we picked up from jets... Abrahams will start at safety. Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 We really need a lb bad, not sure wr should rank above lb. The coach is. We have a #2 receiver facing serious legal issues. Robiskie is a solid pick. Some of you guys need to get off what you think and think about everything......not to mention a guy like Rey wasn't taken right after we picked, so it not like someone jumped on our mistake. Lets see how it plays out in the next hour or so before we proclaim the sky is falling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solon16 Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 COULD HAVE GOT HIM AT 50....SICK SICK SICK.......horrible! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RPrepublic Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 The coach is. We have a #2 receiver facing serious legal issues. Robiskie is a solid pick. Some of you guys need to get off what you think and think about everything......not to mention a guy like Rey wasn't taken right after we picked, so it not like someone jumped on our mistake. Lets see how it plays out in the next hour or so before we proclaim the sky is falling. Agreed. There are so many needs on the team that really any good solid players in any position will help out a lot. I like what we've done so far. The trade of the number 5 was fantastic we picked up a second and 3 players and just moved down 12 spots. This is GREAT so far... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 COULD HAVE GOT HIM AT 50....SICK SICK SICK.......horrible! How do you know??? You don't is the correct answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
next2nothing Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 With the way the 1st round went I don't think any of us know who will or won't be there when we pick next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playerjdd Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 I dont think Robiskie would have fallen to 50th. ReyRey would have been nice but Robiskie is a great reciver that is solid. The more i see people moving up the more i realize we got ripped just getting 6th rounders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gips Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 Loving this draft so far. WR was our thinnest position. A+ so far... Don't forget the players we picked up from jets... Abrahams will start at safety. Zombo Im giving mankok a solid A the plus only comes if we pick up a couple potential LBs and a RB... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greythan Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 6 WR's picked in round one, right? Robiske wouldn't have slid to 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 No way Robo would have fallen to 50. If anything the bears would have taken him at 49, but I think he would have been scooped up before that. Solid pick. I am happy with the picks so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndneighbor Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 COULD HAVE GOT HIM AT 50....SICK SICK SICK.......horrible! The ESPN tracker said he would be contributing immediately. Do you at least agree with that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndneighbor Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 This is where we find out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plumcrazy73 Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 don't understand this one, if we were going offense should have been RB but hey what do i know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalBrownsFan Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 WTF, another WR. How about some defense Browns? How about a RB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndneighbor Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 Massaquoi too. It's gonna be a target rich environment for QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neomogo Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 I like the draft so far. We didn't score a TD in the last 7 games. I wonder if the D would have been a little better if the O was scoring some points. No doubt this gives us Braylon focused in a contract year, while grooming 2 potential starting wideouts. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gips Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 Once again, that's what WE"VE talked about. Mangini and company didn't. They got a guy to help at safety, and LB in free agency. and I stil mantain they believe they can utilize guys like Bell and Wimbley better than RAC. I agree..Mangini has to be thinking he can coach the defense up and many of us have thought under crennel it was the poor coaching that was mostly at fault on both sides of the ball... I think mankok has addressed what BQ/daboll needed to have success today minus a RB and will address the defense tommorow i just hope the scouts have really done their homework to uncover a jewel or two in the 4th to 6th round doo pile... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BernietheKid Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 I like the draft so far. We didn't score a TD in the last 7 games. I wonder if the D would have been a little better if the O was scoring some points. No doubt this gives us Braylon focused in a contract year, while grooming 2 potential starting wideouts. Mike Exactly people don't understand Braylon is gonna be gone next year. So you better get his replacements now and at least have a year of NFL experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldcrow1945 Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 Exactly people don't understand Braylon is gonna be gone next year. So you better get his replacements now and at least have a year of NFL experience. This is the only thing I will grant the FO. Depending on who declares next year, the pickings at WR in the 2010 class is going to be very thin. But RB is is loaded. They may be waiting until next year to grab the RB. I still don't understand drafting two WR's who are exact mirrors of each other. I think mz the pussy made a good point. Why not draft Maclin instead of dropping two more spots and picking up an extra freaking 6th rounder? Then draft Massaquoi just where they did. Now you have you slot burner that would stretch the defense and the possession type in Massaquoi. Look what Deshaun Jackson did this year? Maclin could've been that for Quinn. Why did they sign David Patten if they thought they may do this with two WR's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tobalaz Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 Why did they sign David Patten if they thought they may do this with two WR's? Mentor? He knows the offensive system and could help the young guys quite a bit. The question is, with Donte "honk honk thump thump whoops! didn't know I was at a border crossing" Stallworth pretty much gone and us taking another 2 wideouts is Steptoe or Hubbard gone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BernietheKid Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 This is the only thing I will grant the FO. Depending on who declares next year, the pickings at WR in the 2010 class is going to be very thin. But RB is is loaded. They may be waiting until next year to grab the RB. I still don't understand drafting two WR's who are exact mirrors of each other. I think mz the pussy made a good point. Why not draft Maclin instead of dropping two more spots and picking up an extra freaking 6th rounder? Then draft Massaquoi just where they did. Now you have you slot burner that would stretch the defense and the possession type in Massaquoi. Look what Deshaun Jackson did this year? Maclin could've been that for Quinn. Why did they sign David Patten if they thought they may do this with two WR's? I kinda didn't think they set it up that way I think that's how the board fell to them. You and I may like or not like the picks, but the fact of the matter is they drafted these guys because they like what they saw. Just because you have a guy rated higher than me doesn't mean it's a bad pick. It just means our board is different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YtownBrownsBacker Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 WOW another WR???? It tells me that Edwards still may not be safe. Maybe a player, a pick and a top pick next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLovin Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 Robiskie is chump change. He played at the ohio State chockhole univeristy.. Fits nicely into Brownie land.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.