calfoxwc Posted December 19, 2016 Report Share Posted December 19, 2016 unbelievable. what a farce he is. http://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/12/19/obama-warns-trump-against-using-the-executive-order-too-much-for-real/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted December 19, 2016 Report Share Posted December 19, 2016 BS Detected Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted December 19, 2016 Report Share Posted December 19, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Wow is this true? Obamas used lessexec orders than reagan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Even less than gw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted December 20, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 the problem lies with the KIND OF EXEC ORDERS. It's one thing to exec order a twist to a law for good reason, backed by bipartisan congress... and another to be an obaMao dicktater. But, do go ahead and be stupid about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 But, do go ahead and be stupid about it. Oh i get it, fine when ur side does not fine when the other side does. Totally got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2014/02/03/the-lawless-presidencies-of-barack-obama-and-ronald-reagan/#7839fd5815cd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Lawless reagan indeed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted December 20, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 you're being stupid. Obama has issued 195 executive orders as of Tuesday. Published alongside them in the Federal Register are 198 presidential memoranda — all of which carry the same legal force as executive orders. He's already signed 33% more presidentialmemoranda in less than six years than Bush did in eight.Dec 17, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted December 20, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/12/16/obama-presidential-memoranda-executive-orders/20191805/ http://www.infowars.com/study-obama-has-issued-more-restrictive-executive-orders-than-past-six-administrations/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted December 20, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2014/02/04/ruth-marcus-obama-executive-order/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/waynecrews/2016/01/10/this-inventory-of-obamas-dozens-of-executive-actions-frames-his-final-state-of-the-union-address/#7e49b01e41bc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted December 20, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 "the daily dot" must smoke pot. or just dishonest, liberal style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 the problem lies with the KIND OF EXEC ORDERS. It's one thing to exec order a twist to a law for good reason, backed by bipartisan congress... and another to be an obaMao dicktater. But, do go ahead and be stupid about it. Why would anything backed by bipartisan congress need an executive order? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Why would anything backed by bipartisan congress need an executive order? Could have been time sensitive and they were out of session? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Of course Woody's chart came from the dsilly dot, which might be too small to have made his bullshit detector list. But regardless of that in this case the story and the headline are congruous. In the Obama's statement doesn't really appear to be outrageous does it? So why question the story? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/orders.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Obama signed too many executive orders! ... It's not the total number, it's the TYPE of orders that matter! And I don't like his! ... Actually, don't even count executive orders. Look at this other thing Obama has a lot of instead! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Ahh ok so the obama admin calls it a "memo"......ic what they did there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 The point isn't Obammy issued more executive orders, the point is that the president told Trump to keep an eye on it. Regardless of how many Obama ordered he got a great deal of shit for it. I don't think the exchange is a big deal. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 My hw for tonight is to study the diff between a memo and an order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 I think an order is for things like if the president is working late and they need take out. Obama did it less than W because obviously he's a slacker. A memo is like when he needs to set up a tee time, hence why there's loads of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Ty chris, cleared that right up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted December 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2016 Why would anything backed by bipartisan congress need an executive order? because if Congress passes a law, the pres can tweak it if necessary. Tweak doesn't = make new laws by exec order, force political agenda crap down Congress's throat because you couldn't get them to do what you wanted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.